Nursing Educators’ Experiences and Expectations of Research Production at a Faculty of Health Sciences: A Qualitative Study

Gelasius Panduleni  Shatimwene; Daniel Opotamutale Ashipala

doi:10.25159/2520-5293/14153

Authors

Gelasius Panduleni Shatimwene University of Namibia
Daniel Opotamutale Ashipala University of Namibia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8913-056X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-5293/14153

Keywords:

expectations, experiences, research production, nursing educators, qualitative research

Abstract

Research production remains one of the most important tools to predict the likely number of future outputs for a set of researchers. Nursing educators have expectations when they enter an academic institution; however, if these expectations are not matched with their experiences, then their research production will be hampered. The purpose of this study was to explore nursing educators’ expectations and experiences regarding research production at the Faculty of Health Sciences at a national university in Namibia. The study used the qualitative approach with an explorative, descriptive and contextual design. Eighteen nursing educators from the School of Nursing and Public Health participated in the study. Participants were chosen by using a convenience sampling method. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews between June and September 2022 and were analysed using thematic analysis for recurring themes. The following themes emerged from the data analysis: individual research output and role expectations; institutional factors affecting research production; and corrective measures to improve research production. These findings demonstrate that there is a significant need to support the production of quality research of nursing educators by addressing the requirements of the academic and research staff so as to maximise the impact of their research and establish the University of Namibia as a renowned international research institution. This can be achieved through creating an opportunity for hosting research seminars, and by providing adequate financial support to academics and research staff to maximise the impact of their research. The findings of this study can be used to develop baseline data, which can enable a “point-in-time” snapshot of individual activity. This will enable consolidation of metrics on research activity up to faculty, school and institutional performance that is geared towards improving research production among academics, as well as the development of policies that support such production.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Daniel Opotamutale Ashipala, University of Namibia

Department of General Nursing Science, School of Nursing and Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Namibia (UNAM), Rundu, Namibia

References

Albers, S. 2015. “What Drives Publication Productivity in German Business Faculties?” Publication Productivity 67 (1): 6–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396921. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396921. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396921

Ashipala, D. O., and R. M. Livingi. 2021. “Undergraduate Nursing Students’ Challenges when Writing Research Proposals at the University of Namibia.” Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery 23 (1): 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-5293/8731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-5293/8731

Azzopardi, D., Z. Prytherch, and J. Hall. 2018. “UNAM Research Process Review: Initial Consultation Document.” Cardiff University, 1–14.

Braun, V., V. Clarke, N. Hayfield, and G. Terry. 2019. “Thematic Analysis.” In Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Science, edited by P. Liamputtong. Springer, Singapore. Accessed May 20, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103

Brink, H., C. van der Walt, and G. van Rensburg. 2018. Fundamentals of Research Methodology for Healthcare Professionals, 3rd edition. Cape Town: Juta.

Burns, N., and S. K. Grove. 2016. Understanding Nursing Research: Building an Evidence-based Practice. South Africa: Elsevier Health Science.

De Vos, A. S., H. Strydom, C. B. Fouche, and C. S. L. Delport. 2011. Research at Grass Roots. Pretoria: Van Schaik.

Gray, J. R., S. K. Grove, and S. Sutherland. 2017. The Practice of Nursing Research. Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence, 8th edition. Elsevier.

Hart, G, and L. Kleinveldt. 2011. “The Role of Academic Libraries in Research: Researchers’ Perspectives at South African University of Technology.” South Africa Journal of Library and Information Science 77 (1). https://doi.org/10.7553/77-1-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7553/77-1-65

Heng, K., M. O. Hamid, and A. Khan. 2020. “Factors Influencing Academics’ Research Engagement and Productivity: A Developing Countries Perspective.” Australia: Issues in Educational Research 30 (3): 965–987.

Iqbal, M. Z. 2011. “Factors Related to Low Research Productivity at Higher Education Level.” Asian Social Science 7 (2): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n2p188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n2p188

Iqbal, M. Z., S. Jalal, and M. K. Mahmood. 2018. “Factors Influencing Research Culture in Public Universities of Punjab: Faculty Members’ Perspective.” Bulletin of Education and Research 40 (3): 187–200.

Jaffe, K., E. Horst, L. H. Gunn, J. D. Zambrano, and G. Molina. 2020. “A Network Analysis of Research Productivity by Country, Discipline, and Wealth.” PLoS One 15 (5): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232458

Johan, F., M. A. Siddiqui, Z. A. I. Khabouri, R. F. M. I. Riyami, and A. Ahuja. 2021. “Factors Affecting Quality of Academic Research: Perception of Researchers at Oman Medical College.” Oman: Open Access Text. https://doi.org/10.15761/MCA.1000127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15761/MCA.1000127

Kazoka, J. E., and E. Wema. 2020. “An Analysis of the Factors Influencing Research Capacity Developments in Higher Education Institutions in Tanzania.” University of Dar es Salaam Library Journal 15 (1).

Kwiek, M. 2016. “The European Research Elite: A Cross-national Study of Highly Productive Academics in 11 Countries.” Higher Education 71 (3): 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9910-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9910-x

Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar. Crossref. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

LoBiondo-Wood, G., and J. Haber. 2017. Nursing Research: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-based Practice, 9th edition. United States: Elsevier.

Mapuare, I., H. M. Kapenda, and P. Claasen. 2016. Research Report, 1–98.

Maree, K. 2016. First Steps in Research. Pretoria: Van Schaik.

Moser, A., and I. Korstjens. 2018. “Series: Practical Guidance to Qualitative Research, Part 3: Sampling, Data Collection and Analysis.” European Journal of General Practice https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091

Nasser-Abu Alhija, F. M., and A. Majdob. 2017. “Predictors of Teacher Educators’ Research Productivity.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 42 (11): 34–51. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n11.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n11.3

Negash, M., T. T. Lemma, and G. Samkin. 2019. “Factors Impacting Accounting Research Output in Developing Countries: An Exploratory Study.” The British Accounting Review 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2018.09.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2018.09.003

Nguyen, Q. H. 2015. “Factors Influencing the Research Productivity of Academics at the Research-oriented University in Vietnam.” Unpublished PhD thesis. Brisbane: Griffith University.

Phuong, Y. H. L. 2017. “Factors Inhibiting English Lecturers from Doing Research: The Case of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam.” Phranakhon Rajabhat Research Journal (Humanities and Social Sciences) 12 (2): 60–72. https://so05.tcithaijo.org/index.php/PNRU_JHSS/article/view/84073/82656.

Polit, D. F., and C. T. Beck. 2017. Nursing Research. Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice, 9th edition. W & W. Lippincott.

Tuan, N. A., T. T. Hue, L. T. Lien, L. Huu Van, H. T. T. Nhung, and L. Q. Dat. 2022. “Management Factors Influencing Lecturers’ Research Productivity in Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam: A Structural Equation Modelling Analysis.” Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10510

Uwizeye, D., F. Karimi, C. Thiong’o, J. Syonguvi, V. Ochieng, F. Kiroro, and G. Alex. 2022. “Factors Associated with Research Productivity in Higher Education Institutions in Africa: A Systematic Review.” AAS Open Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/aasopenres.13211.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/aasopenres.13211.2

Valdivieso, P. A., B. A. Alecchi, and D. Arévalo-Avecillas. 2021. “Factors that Influence the Individual Research Output of University Professors: The Case of Ecuador, Peru, and Colombia.” Journal of Hispanic Higher Education 21 (4) 450–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/15381927211008684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15381927211008684

Vuong, T. T., T. H. K. Nguyen, T. M. Ho, and Q. H. Vuong. 2018. “The (In) significance of Socio-demographic Factors as Possible Determinants of Vietnamese social Scientists’ Contribution-adjusted Productivity: Preliminary Results from 2008–2017.” Scopus Data Societies: MDPI 8 (3). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8010003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8010003

Yang, J. C. 2017. “A Study of Factors Affecting University Professors Research Output: Perspectives of Taiwanese Professors.” Journal of College Teaching and Learning 14 (1): 10–20. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v14i1.9968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v14i1.9968