Are Reusable Menstrual Pads a Sustainable and Safe Alternative to Disposable Pads? A Qualitative Study

Amina Suleiman Rajah; Umar Lawal Bello; Umar Yunusa; Ahmed Suberu; Abdullahi Haruna; Faiza Tijjani Tashi; Abdulaziz Sulaiman Tukuntawa; Sidetu O. Abdullahi

doi:10.25159/2520-5293/21237

Authors

Amina Suleiman Rajah Bayero University Kano https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3506-2098
Umar Lawal Bello Bayero University Kano https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6545-1222
Umar Yunusa Bayero University Kano
Ahmed Suberu Bayero University Kano
Abdullahi Haruna Bayero University Kano
Faiza Tijjani Tashi Bayero University Kano
Abdulaziz Sulaiman Tukuntawa National Orthopaedic Hospital, Nigeria
Sidetu O. Abdullahi College of Nursing Studies, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-5293/21237

Keywords:

experiences, menstrual hygiene, perception, qualitative, reusable menstrual pads, thematic analysis

Abstract

Reusable menstrual pads (RMPs) offer an eco-friendly, cost-effective alternative to disposable products, with potential health, environmental and financial benefits. This study aims to explore the nuanced experiences, perceptions and attitudes of female students regarding RMPs, and also the emotional and psychological impact of RMPs on these students in Kano, Nigeria. A narrative inquiry approach was used, following COREQ guidelines for rigorous qualitative reporting. The study was conducted among 21 female students in public secondary schools in Kano State, Nigeria. In-depth interviews, guided by a semi-structured protocol adapted from prior studies explored the participants’ experiences with RMPs. Purposive sampling ensured diverse perspectives, and data saturation was achieved after 21 interviews. The data were analysed through Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis, allowing for a detailed exploration of the participants’ experiences. Four main themes emerged: (1) perceived nuisance of usage – initial discomfort and challenges with washing and drying; (2) the positive journey with RMPs; the participants reported improved comfort, economic benefits and environmental consciousness over the course of time; (3) challenges in transition – barriers such as hygiene in public settings and cultural taboos; and (4) environmental and spiritual implications – a sense of responsibility to reduce waste, aligning with the participants’ values of sustainable health practices. The findings from this study highlight the nuanced journey of adopting RMPs, revealing a trajectory that blends initial hesitations with positive long-term experiences. The participants cited improved comfort, economic savings and environmental benefits, which align well with broader studies on sustainable menstrual products.

Author Biographies

References

Alam, M. U., F. Sultana, E. C. Hunter, P. J. Winch, L. Unicomb, S. Sarker, M. T. Mahfuz, A. Al-Masud, M. Rahman, and S. P. Luby. 2022. “Evaluation of a Menstrual Hygiene Intervention in Urban and Rural Schools in Bangladesh: A Pilot Study.” BMC Public Health 22 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13478-1.

Anaba, E. A., E. A. Udofia, A. Manu, A. A. Daniels, and R. Aryeetey. 2022. “Use of Reusable Menstrual Management Materials and Associated Factors Among Women of Reproductive Age in Ghana: Analysis of the 2017/18 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey.” BMC Women’s Health 22 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01670-9.

Benshaul-Tolonen, A., G. Zulaika, E. Nyothach, C. Odour, L. Mason, D. Obor, K. T. Alexander, K. F. Laserson, and P. A. Phillips-Howard. 2021. Sanitary Products, Absenteeism and Psychosocial Well-Being: Evidence from a Three-Arm Cluster Randomized Controlled Feasibility Study in Western Kenya. Columbia SIPA Working Paper 93. https://anjatolonen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/wp93tolonen.pdf.

Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Foster, J., and P. Montgomery. 2021. “A Study of Environmentally Friendly Menstrual Absorbents in the Context of Social Change for Adolescent Girls in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18 (18): 9766. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189766.

Hennegan, J., C. Dolan, L. Steinfield, and P. Montgomery. 2017. “A Qualitative Understanding of the Effects of Reusable Sanitary Pads and Puberty Education: Implications for Future Research.” Reproductive Health 14 (1): 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0339-9.

Hennegan, J., C. Dolan, M. Wu, L. Scott, and P. Montgomery. 2016a. “Measuring the Prevalence and Impact of Poor Menstrual Hygiene Management.” BMJ Open 6: e012596. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012596.

Hennegan, J., C. Dolan, M. Wu, L. Scott, and P. Montgomery. 2016b. “Schoolgirls’ Experience and Appraisal of Menstrual Absorbents in Rural Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Reusable Sanitary Pads.” Reproductive Health 13 (1): 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0260-7.

Hennegan, J., A. Nansubuga, A. Akullo, C. Smith, and K. J. Schwab. 2020. “The Menstrual Practices Questionnaire (MPQ): Development, Elaboration, and Implications for Future Research.” Global Health Action 13 (1): 1829402. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2020.1829402.

Kubovski, A., and S. C. Shabot. 2024. “Experience of Menstruation with the Use of Reusable Menstrual Products: A Qualitative Study Among Menstruators in Israel.” Culture, Health & Sexuality 26 (7): 904–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2023.2260465.

Mason, L., M. Sahin, K. Laserson, K. Oruko, E. Nyothach, K. Alexander, F. Odhiambo, A. Eleveld, E. Isiye, I. Ngere, J. Omoto, A. Mohammed, J. Vulule, and P. Phillips-Howard. 2015. “Adolescent Schoolgirls’ Experiences of Menstrual Cups and Pads in Rural Western Kenya: A Qualitative Study.” Waterlines 34 (1): 15–30. https://doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.2015.003.

Patel, K., S. Dwivedyb, N. Pandac, S. Swaina, S. Patia, and S. K. Palo. 2023. “Is Menstrual Cup a Sustainable and Safe Alternative in Menstrual Hygiene Management? A Qualitative Exploratory Study Based on User’s Experience in India.” Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health 20: 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2022.101212.

Pednekar, S., S. Some, K. Rivankar, and R. Thakore. 2022. “Enabling Factors for Sustainable Menstrual Hygiene Management Practices: A Rapid Review.” Discover Sustainability 3 (1): 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-022-00097-4.

Shannon, A. K., G. J. Melendez-Torres, and J. Hennegan. 2021. “How Do Women and Girls Experience Menstrual Health Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? Insights from a Systematic Review and Qualitative Metasynthesis.” Culture, Health & Sexuality 23 (5): 624–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2020.1718758.

UNESCO. 2021, 1 November. Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Education. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/reimagining-our-futures-together-new-social-contract-education.

UNICEF. 2019. Guide to Menstrual Hygiene Materials. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/media/91346/file/unicef-guide-menstrual-hygiene-materials-2019.pdf.

World Bank Group. 2022. Menstrual Health and Hygiene. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/water/brief/menstrual-health-and-hygiene.