Covid-19 and Post-burial Rituals of the Sotho People in Gwanda South Province in Zimbabwe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6549/11823Keywords:
COVID-19, post-burial rituals, sotho, Indigenous knowledge, human dignity, collectivismAbstract
The Sotho cultural group of the Gwanda South area in Zimbabwe is a traditional, close-knitted speech community that significantly relies on Indigenous knowledge systems to sustain communal alliances that aid their day-to-day lifestyles. The advent of the coronavirus disease (Covid-19) in 2019 ushered in a significant re-shuffle on how pre-burial, during burial and post-burial rituals—necessary for social cohesion and harmony—are conducted among this ethnic group. The pandemic was a threat to the socio-cultural norms and values that are at the centre of African societies. Both the preventive and reactive measures, whether self or government imposed, had an impact on most of the Sotho burial practices or rituals that were mainly defined by collectivism. Stringent requirements on social distancing, avoidance of social gatherings, a ban on intra and inter-city travel, burying within the province where one would have died, and a ban on body viewing (among other laws) saw the hindrance of most burial rituals. This Afrocentric investigation of the post-burial practices of the Basotho people in Zimbabwe does not only strive to generate knowledge that adds to the existing scholarship, but also documents information about the significance of the burial philosophies of this previously marginalised Sotho community in Zimbabwe. The study establishes how this sudden shift, necessitated by the pandemic, negatively impacted the human dignity of the Sotho community and their mandate to protect the most vulnerable groups, including orphans, widows and the elderly. Phone call interviews were used to interview purposively sampled elderly members of the Basotho group and cultural activists in the Gwanda South region.
References
Asuquo, O. 2011. “A Rationalization of an African Concept of Life, Death and the Hereafter.” American Journal of Social Management Sciences 2: 171–175. https://doi.org/10.5251/ajsms.2011.2.1.171.175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5251/ajsms.2011.2.1.171.175
Cabral, A. 1980. Unity and Struggle: Speeches and Writings. London: Heinemann.
Denzin, N. K., and Y. S. Lincoln. 2011. “Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 1–20. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Given, L. 2008. The Sage Encyclopaedia of Qualitative Methods. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909
Lee, A. M. 2007. “Developing Effective Supervisors: Concepts of Research Supervision.” South African Journal of Higher Education 21 (4): 680–693. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v21i4.25690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v21i4.25690
Mankga, R. W. 2013. “Language Usage in some Traditional Rituals in Northern Sotho.” Accessed May 1, 2021. http://ulspace.ul.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10386/1147/Mankga_rw_2013.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y.
Metcalf, P., and R. Huntington. 1991. Celebrations of Death: Anthropology of Mortuary Ritual. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803178
Ngara. E. 1990. Ideology and Form in African Poetry. Harare: Baobab Books.
Smith, T. F. 1987. “Death, Ritual and Art in Africa.” Africa Arts Journal 21 (1): 28–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/3336496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3336496
Reliefweb. 2021. “The Impact of Covid-19 on Socio-Economic Rights in Zimbabwe.” Accessed June 15, 2021. https://reliefweb.int/report/zimbabwe/impact-covid-19-socio-economic-rights-zimbabwe.
Walsh, D., and S. Downe. 2005. “Meta-synthesis Method for Qualitative Research: A Literature Review.” Methodological Issues in Nursing Research 50 (2): 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x
Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright will be vested in Unisa Press. However, as long as you do not use the article in ways which would directly conflict with the publisher’s business interests, you retain the right to use your own article (provided you acknowledge the published version of the article) as follows:
- to make further copies of all or part of the published article for your use in classroom teaching;
- to make copies of the final accepted version of the article for internal distribution within your institution, or to place it on your own or your institution’s website or repository, or on a site that does not charge for access to the article, but you must arrange not to make the final accepted version of the article available to the public until 18 months after the date of acceptance;
- to re-use all or part of this material in a compilation of your own works or in a textbook of which you are the author, or as the basis for a conference presentation.
Accepted 2023-02-21
Published 2023-04-03