Child Labour Laws in South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe: A Comparative Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/1727-7140/3317Keywords:
South Africa, Zimbabwe, Zambia, child labour, child work, International Labour Organization, child sex workers, child farm workers, child trafficking, independent supranational organisation, progressive lawsAbstract
This article reports on a study that investigated the effectiveness of child labour laws intended to promote child rights and the protection of children from unfair and forced labour. Legal scholars distinguish between child work and child labour: forced child labour manifests itself in abusing children sexually, forcing children to work on farms, and compromising children’s rights to education. Although South Africa, Zimbabwe and Zambia have laws in place to protect children from child labour, the abuse of children continues in these countries. Furthermore, although these three countries are signatories to conventions of the International Labour Organisation that seek to eliminate child labour, they have been unable to stem the tide of child labour. This article argues that there is a need for the three countries to work closely together to implement policies that reverse or fight against child labour. The researchers used a qualitative methodology to interpret the variations in the application of child labour laws. They found there are no harmonised laws to deal with child labour in South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Hence, this article recommends that an independent supranational organisation be established in Southern Africa to monitor, evaluate, and implement progressive laws to eradicate child labour in line with internationally recognised best practices as set out in child labour laws.Downloads
Published
2019-01-02
How to Cite
Vambe, Beauty, and Amos Saurombe. 2018. “Child Labour Laws in South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe: A Comparative Analysis”. Commonwealth Youth and Development 16 (1):16 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/1727-7140/3317.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright will be vested in Unisa Press. However, as long as you do not use the article in ways which would directly conflict with the publisher’s business interests, you retain the right to use your own article (provided you acknowledge the published version of the article) as follows:
- to make further copies of all or part of the published article for your use in classroom teaching;
- to make copies of the final accepted version of the article for internal distribution within your institution, or to place it on your own or your institution’s website or repository, or on a site that does not charge for access to the article, but you must arrange not to make the final accepted version of the article available to the public until 18 months after the date of acceptance;
- to re-use all or part of this material in a compilation of your own works or in a textbook of which you are the author, or as the basis for a conference presentation.
Received 2017-10-18
Accepted 2017-10-19
Published 2019-01-02
Accepted 2017-10-19
Published 2019-01-02