Flags, Verdicts and Texts: Dissident Narratives and Literary Mandates for Re-Writing Empire

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6565/15894

Keywords:

interdisciplinarity, intertextuality, polycrises, verdicts, representation, intersectionality, Black subjectivities

Abstract

Researchers theorising the intersection and intertextuality between literature and law have explored and analysed democracy, governance, and trust from diverse analytical approaches. Political and legal structures are undergoing polycrises and governance is assailed by wicked policy problems, while democratic norms and legitimacy are eroded. Trust—in all its elasticity—is increasingly polarised among groups and linked to ethnic, cultural, and place-based identities and resentments. Past and present experiences in the lace of memory show that racial categories have persisted into the postcolonial chronos, and we need to question what this means for the rhizome of democracy. New ideas and identities challenge how democracy can represent diverse groups and interests, emphasising the nourishing and symbiotic relationships between literature and law within the context of decolonising notions of global-glocal knowledge economies. Governance and legal architecture are held hostage by powerful interest groups, and axiomatic aspirations to kairos and trust in the fair distribution of wealth and resources for the institutionalisation of democracy have been enfeebled. New forms of democratic participation are emerging which challenge the concepts and premises of choice and plurality. Repeated pressures to understand major crises such as criminal and gendered violence where geopolitical instabilities weaken trust in the capacity of democratic processes have not provided acceptable and socially just verdicts. If external pressures on democratic institutions are growing, criticisms against forms of poor governance (e.g., corruption, presidential personalisation of the state, short-termism, polarisation) are also increasingly made against legal and political institutions. New expressions of distrust in flags and resistance against legal, cultural, and economic powers are immanent in literary texts. This article uses Native Son, Mating Birds, and The Trial of Dedan Kimathi to address the following question: What are the pre-requisites and co-requisites for democracy and socially just governance to flourish in legal and literary situations of heightened economic marginalisation, extreme cultural oppressions, and diminishing political legitimacy? The nexus and intersectionality between legal and literary textual structures allow for an analysis of the role and impact of social, cultural, political, and juridical reformulations in the three selected texts. I argue that the (counter)story, as interdisciplinary method, is thus tasked (and suffused) with immense possibilities.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Arnold, David. 2004. “The Self and the Cell: Indian Prison Narratives as Life Histories.” In Telling Lives in India: Biography, Autobiography, and Life History, edited by David Arnold and Stuart Blackburn, 29–53. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin. 1989. The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203402627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203402627

Baldwin, James. (1964) 2003. Notes of a Native Son. Boston: Beacon Press.

Blow, Charles M. 2021. The Devil You Know: A Black Power Manifesto. New York: Harper Perennial.

Braidotti, Rosi. 2019. Posthuman Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Capers, Bennett. 2006. “The Trial of Bigger Thomas: Race, Gender, and Trespass.” New York University Review of Law and Social Change 31 (1): 1–50. https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/faculty/127/.

Carmichael, Stokely. 1966. “Black Power.” Voices of Democracy. Accessed September 10, 2024. https://voicesofdemocracy.umd.edu/carmichael-black-power-speech-text/.

Cooper, Frederick. 2014. Africa in the World: Capitalism, Empire, Nation-State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369306

Derrida, Jacques. 2005. Apprendre á vivre enfin. Paris: Galilee.

Fitzpatrick, Peter. 1992. The Mythology of Modern Law. London: Routledge.

Flores, Nelson, and Jonathan Rosa. 2023. “Undoing Competence: Coloniality, Homogeneity, and the Overrepresentation of Whiteness in Applied Linguistics.” Language Learning 72 (S2): 268–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12528

Goldberg, David Theo. 2002. “Racial States.” In A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, edited by David Theo Golberg and John Solomos, 233–258. Hoboken: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631206163.2002.00023.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631206163.2002.00023.x

Henning, Melber, Uma Kothari, Laura Camfield, and Kees Biekart, eds. 2024. Challenging Global Development: Towards Decoloniality and Justice. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30308-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30308-1

Lame Deer, John Fire. n.d. “A Pueblo Indian Prayer.” Accessed September 13, 2024. https://www.xavier.edu/jesuitresource/online-resources/prayer-index/native-american.

Maeso, Silvia Rodríguez. 2018. “‘Europe’ and the Narrative of the ‘True Racist’: (Un )thinking Anti-Discrimination Law through Race.” Oñati Socio-Legal Series 8 (6): 845–873. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0974

Mignolo, Walter. 2018. “The Conceptual Triad: Modernity/Coloniality/Decoloniality.” In On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis, edited by Walter Mignolo and Catherine E. Walsh, 135–152. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371779-008

Ndhlovu, F. 2019. “South Africa’s Social Transformation Policies: Raciolinguistic Ideologies and Neoliberal Rhetoric.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses 14 (2): 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2019.1592177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2019.1592177

Ngugi wa Thiong’o. 2016. Secure the Base: Making Africa Visible in the Globe. New York: Seagull Books.

Ngũgĩ wa Thiong’o, and Micere Githae Mugo. (1976) 2006. The Trial of Dedan Kimathi. Nairobi: Heinemann.

Nkosi, Lewis. (1982) 2004. Mating Birds. Cape Town: Kwela Books.

Nussbaum, Martha C. 1997. Poetic Justice: The Literary Imagination and Public Life (Alexander Rosenthal Lectures). New York: Beacon Press.

Okunoye, Oyeniyi. 2001. “Dramatizing Postcoloniality: Nationalism and the Rewriting of History in Ngũgĩ and Mugo’s ‘The Trial of Dedan Kimathi.’” History in Africa 28: 225–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3172216

Peters, Julie Stone. 2005. “Law, Literature, and the Vanishing Real: On the Future of an Interdisciplinary Illusion.” PMLA: Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 120 (2): 442–453. https://doi.org/10.1632/003081205X52383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1632/003081205X52383

PBS. n.d. “The Scottsboro Trial: A Timeline.” Accessed September 10, 2024. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/scottsboronine-black-youth-arrested-for-assault/

Seabrook, Jeremy. 2023. “The Present Imperium.” Race and Class 65 (2): 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063968231183896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03063968231183896

Stiepanov, Justyna. 2017. “Between Lawfulness and Lawlessness: The Conceptual Boundary between the System and the Individual in Richard Wright’s Native Son.” Beyond Philology: An International Journal of Linguistics, Literary Studies and English Language Teaching 14 (2): 121–140.

Taylor, Jack. 2016. “The Political Subjection of Bigger Thomas: The Gaze, Biopolitics, and the Court of Law in Richard Wright’s Native Son.” CR: The New Centennial Review 16 (2): 183–202. https://doi.org/10.14321/crnewcentrevi.16.2.0183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14321/crnewcentrevi.16.2.0183

Tuck, W., and T. E. Yang. 2012. “Decolonisation Is Not a Metaphor.” Decolonisation: Indigeneity, Education and Society 1 (1): 1–40.

Whittle, Matthew. 2023. “Decolonization and the Aesthetics of Disorder: Naipaul, Evaristo, Boland.” The Journal of Commonwealth Literature 58 (3): 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989421996054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021989421996054

Wright, Richard. (1940) 2000. Native Son. New York: Vintage Books.

Published

2024-09-18

How to Cite

Hove, Muchativugwa Liberty. “Flags, Verdicts and Texts: Dissident Narratives and Literary Mandates for Re-Writing Empire”. Imbizo, 18 pages . https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6565/15894.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2024-01-30
Accepted 2024-07-17
Published 2024-09-18