THE INTERRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORAL LITERATURE AND MUSEUM STUDIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/2078-9785/1850Keywords:
Folklore, interrelationship, museum studies, oral literatureAbstract
Oral literature and museums are intimately related to each other. While the former is an academic discipline, the latter is an institution. This article examines the historical background of the study of oral literature and the historical development of the museum so that the relationship between the two can be easily appreciated. The article argues that oral literature, as a form of folklore, can help to create good museums and that the museum, on the other hand, can contribute to the study of oral literature. This interrelationship, once appreciated by both oral literature scholars (folklorists) and museologists (museum scholars), will be of tremendous benefit to the study of oral literature as an academic discipline and to the development of more thematic museums, especially in Africa where oral literature is a dynamic aspect of societal life.
Metrics
References
Alembong, N. 1996. Folklore and identity: Lessons for Cameroon. Epasa moto: Bilingual Journal of Language, Letters and Culture 1(3): 119-124.
Asmeng-Boahene, L., and M. Baffoe, ed. 2014. African traditional and oral literature as pedagogical tools in content area classrooms K-12. Charlotte, NC: Information age Publishing.
Ben-Amos, D. 1982. Toward a definition of folklore in context. In Folklore in context: essay, ed.
Ben-Amos, Dan, 2-19. New Delhi: South Asian Publishers.
Boggs, R.S. 2005. Folklore. In Folklore: Critical concepts in literary and cultural studies, vol. 1, ed. A. Dundes, 2–10 . New York: Routledge.
Doyle, W. 2003. The Oxford history of the French Revolution. London: OUP.
Enongene, M.S. 2011. Swazi oral literature studies yesterday and today: The way forward. Southern African Journal of Folklore Studies 21(1): 39–53.
Geertz, C. 1973. The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. New York: Basic Books.
Glassie, H. 1989. The spirit of folk art: the Girard Collection at the Museum of International Folk Art. New York: Harry N. Abrams.
Imeyen. N. 2007. New insights into oral literature: the days of the week in a folktale: crisis in the calendar of the Ibiobio of Nigeria. Lwati: Journal of Contemporary Research 4:184–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/lwati.v4i1.36831
Kenoyer, J.M. 2003. Material culture. In South Asian folklore: an encyclopaedia, ed. A.M.
Margaret, J.C. Peter and D. Sarah, 388–393. New York: Routledge.
Mahmud, F., and H. Rahman. 1987. The museums in Bangladesh. Dhaka: Bangla Academy. Mahmud, F. 1978. Methodologies for the study of folk art of Bangladesh. In Folklore of Bangladesh, Vol. 1, ed. K. Shamsuzzaman, 44–457. Dhaka: Bangla Academy.
Mahmud, F. 1993. Prospects of material folk culture studies and folklife museums in Bangladesh. Dhaka: Bangla Academy.
Sims, M., and S. Martine. 2005. Living folklore. Utah: Utah University Press.
Tala. K.I. 2013. Power and marginality in contemporary Cameroonian orature. Kansas City: Miraclaire Publishers.
Willey, G.R., and P. Phillips. 1958. Method and theory in American archaeology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Accepted 2016-11-18
Published 2017-02-24
