Valency Types in South Ethiosemitic Languages
General Articles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6573/10465Keywords:
alignment, external argument, internal argument, valency, valency type, verbAbstract
This article analyses the main characteristics of verb valency types and the behaviour of verbs in morphosyntactic structures in South Ethiosemitic languages. To achieve the objective, native speaker informants, written texts, and introspection (for Amharic) were used as sources of data. The findings reveal that six valency types of verbs are in use in the languages: avalent, monovalent, bivalent, trivalent, and a valency of ambivalent verbs with one or two arguments, as well as intransitive verbs with a cognate object. Except for the type that concerns avalent verbs, the rest are highly productive. The valency types were differentiated by the required clause elements that precede the verb (e.g., direct object, indirect object, or locative adverbial). Except for the avalent type, all the rest may include obligatory subject(s) and, in some cases, optional adjunct(s).
Metrics
References
Allerton, D. J.1 982. Valency and the English Verb. London: Academic Press.
Allerton, D. J. 2006. “Valency Grammar. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, edited by K. Brown, 301–14. 2nd Edition. Vol. 13. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/02056-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/02056-3
Bedilu, Wakjira. 2010. “Morphology and Verb Construction Types of Kәstanәnna.” PhD diss., Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).
Behrens, Leila. 2007. “Back Grounding and Suppression of Reciprocal Participants: A Cross-linguistic Study.” Studies in Language 31 (2): 327–408. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.2.04beh DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.2.04beh
Benaim, Mitku. 2013. “Harari: A Descriptive Grammar.” PhD diss., Addis Ababa University.
Bickel, B., and J. Nichols. 2009. “Case Marking and Alignment.” In The Oxford Handbook of Case, edited by A. Malchukov and A. Spencer, 304–21. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199206476.013.0021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199206476.013.0021
Comrie, B.1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology (2nd Edition). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Dixon, R. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dixon, R. M. W., and A. Y. Aikhenvald. 2000. Changing Valency. Case Studies in Transitivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750
Dowty, D. 1991. “Thematic Proto-roles and Argument Selection.” Language 67: 547–619. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0021
Gideon, G. 1977. “The Semitic Language of Ethiopia and Their Classification.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 40 (3): 461–507. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00045882 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00045882
Haspelmath, M. 1993. “More on the Typology of Inchoative/Causative Verb Alternations.” In Causatives and Transitivity, edited by B. Comrie and M. Polinsky, 87–121. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.23.05has DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.23.05has
Hetzron, R. 1972. Ethiopian Semitic Studies in Classification. Cambridge: Manchester University Press.
Horrocks, G., and S. Melita. 2010. “Morphological Aspect and the Distribution of Cognate Objects across Language.” In Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure, edited by M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron, and I. Sichel, 284–308. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0014
Huddleston, R., and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2005. A Student’s Introduction to English Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815515
Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001
Jensen, A. 2013. Principper for grammatiskanalyse. Lecture Note. København: Arnold Busck.
Jones, M. 1988. “Cognate Objects and the Case Filter.” Journal of Linguistics 24: 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011579 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011579
Kearns, K. 2011. Semantics. London: MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-35609-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-35609-2
Leslau, W. 1995. Reference Grammar of Amharic. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Mengistu, Amberber. 2002. Verb Classes and Transitivity in Amharic. Munich: Lincom.
Mittwoch, A. 1998. “Cognate Objects as Reflections of Davidsonian Event Arguments.” In Events and Grammar, edited by S. Rothstein, 309–32. Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_13
Ousman, Shafi. 2015. “Descriptive Grammar of Məsqan.” PhD diss., Addis Ababa University.
Radford, A. 2004. English Syntax: An Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841675
Spencer, A. 1991.Morphological Theory: An Introduction to Word Structure in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tesniere, L. 1959. Elements of Structural Syntax. Paris: C. Klinksieck.
Velupilla, Viveka. 2012. An Introduction to Linguistic Typology. London: John Benjamin’s Publishing Company.
Williams, E. 1989. “Predication.” Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203–38.
Yohannes, Adigeh. 2015. “Descriptive Grammar of Endəgaɲ.” PhD diss., Addis Ababa University.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Unisa PressAccepted 2022-12-07
Published 2023-02-17
