Epistemic Contextualism as Semantic Thesis  and Knowledge-Attribution Standards in Qoheleth: Festschrift for Gert Prinsloo

Jaco Gericke

doi:10.25159/2663-6573/12374

Authors

Jaco Gericke North-West University (Vaal Campus)Faculty of Humanities

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6573/12374

Keywords:

Qohelet, Knowledge, Epistemic contextualism, philosophy, semantics

Abstract

The concept of knowledge plays an important role in Qoheleth. Both linguistic and philosophical perspectives remain popular trends in current related research. Developments in the two auxiliary disciplines that remain largely ignored include those associated with “Epistemic Contextualism.” The theory has been used as both a substantive-epistemological and a descriptive-semantic thesis, both of which concern the way variable epistemic standards are seen to supervene in different contexts of knowledge attributions. Initially offered as a solution to the challenges of radical scepticism, it has recently sought to show how an utterance affirming and denying a subject “knows” that something is the case could both be meaningful in virtue of changing propositional contents expressed in response to variable contextual stakes, interests, and needs. The original contribution of this study lies in constructing the relevant data set in Qoheleth and illustrating the possibilities and problems of applying the semantic format of the theory to discrepant propositional attitude reports in the world of the text.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bartholomew, C. 2009. Ecclesiastes. Baker Bible Commentary Series. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Berlejung, A., P. van Hecke. Eds. 2007. The Language of Qoheleth in its Context: Essays in Honour of Prof. A. Schoors on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday. BETL 164. Louvain: Peeters.

Bianchi, F. 1993. “The Language of Qoheleth: A Bibliographical Survey.” Zeitschrift für die Alttestmentliche Wissenschaf 105 (1): 210–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/zatw.1993.105.2.210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zatw.1993.105.2.210

Crenshaw, J. L. 1998. “Qoheleth’s Understanding of Intellectual Inquiry.” In Qoheleth in the Context of Wisdom, edited by Antoon Schoors, 204–24. Leuven: Peeters.

DeRose, K. 1992. “Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 15 (1): 213–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2107917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2107917

DeRose, K. 1999. “Contextualism: An Explanation and Defense.” In The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, edited by John Greco and Ernest Sosa, 187–205. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631202912.1998.00011.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631202912.1998.00011.x

DeRose, K. 2009. The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199564460.003.0007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199564460.001.0001

Enns, P. 2011. Ecclesiastes. Two Horizons Old Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Ezcurdia, M. 2017. “The Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction and Context-Sensitivity.” In The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Contextualism, edited by Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa, 441–54. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315745275-35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315745275-35

Fox, M. V. 1987. “Qoheleth’s Epistemology.” Hebrew Union College Annual 58 (2), 137–56.

Fox, M. V. 1989. Qoheleth and his Contradictions. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.

Fox, M. V. 1998. “The Inner Structure of Qoheleth’s Thought.” In Qoheleth in the Context of Wisdom, edited by Antoon Schoors, 225–38. Leuven: Peeters.

Fox, M. V. 1999. A Time to Tear Down and A Time to Build Up: A Rereading of Ecclesiastes. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Frydrych, T. 2002. Living under the Sun: An Examination of Proverbs and Qoheleth. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004276161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004276161

Gericke, J. 2015. “A Comprehensive Philosophical Approach to Qoheleth’s Epistemology.” HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 71 (1): 1–9, Art # 2868. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v71i1.2868 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v71i1.2868

Greco, J., and E. Sosa. 1999. The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631202912.1998.00001.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631202912.1998.x

Ichikawa, J. J. 2017. “Introduction: What is Epistemic Contextualism?” In The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Contextualism, edited by J. J. Ichikawa, 1–10. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315745275-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315745275-1

Ichikawa, J. J., and M. Steup. 2018. “The Analysis of Knowledge.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition). Edited by Edward N. Zalta. Accessed July 21, 2022. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/knowledge-analysis/.

Isaksson, B. 1987. Studies in the Language of Qoheleth: With Special Emphasis on the Verbal System. Studia Semitica Upsaliensia 10. Uppsala: Uppsala University Press.

O’Dowd, R. 2009. The Wisdom of Torah: Epistemology in Deuteronomy and the Wisdom Literature. Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments 225. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.

Pinker, A. 2013. “Ecclesiastes, Part II: Themes.” Jewish Bible Quarterly 41 (3): 163–70.

Rysiew, P. 2021. "Epistemic Contextualism." The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. Accessed July 17, 2022. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/contextualism-epistemology/.

Schellenberg, A. 2002. Erkenntnis als Problem: Qoheleth und die alttestamentliche Diskussion um das menschliche Erkennen. Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 188. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.

Schellenberg, A. 2021. “Epistemology: Wisdom, Knowledge, and Revelation.” In Oxford Handbook of Wisdom and the Bible, edited by Will Kynes, 29–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190661267.013.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190661267.013.3

Schoors, A. 1992. The Preacher Sought to Find Pleasing Words. A Study of the Language of Qoheleth. Part 1, Grammar. OLA 41. Leuven: Peeters.

Schoors, A. 2004. The Preacher Sought to Find Pleasing Words. A Study of the Language of Qoheleth. Part 2, Vocabulary. OLA 143. Leuven: Peeters.

Sciumbata, M. P. 1996. “Peculiarita e Motivazioni della Struttura Lessicale dei Verbi della “Conoscenza” in Qoheleth: Abbozzo di una storia dell'epistemologia ebraico-biblica.” Henoch 18 (1): 235–49.

Sneed, M. 2012. Ecclesiastes and The Politics of Pessimism. Atlanta: SBL Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt32bzwz DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt32bzwz

Stine, G. 1976. “Skepticism, Relevant Alternatives, and Deductive Closure.” Philosophical Studies 29 (1): 249–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411885 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411885

Weeks, S. 2012. Ecclesiastes and Scepticism. Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies 541. New York: T&T Clark.

Weeks, S. 2020. Ecclesiastes 1-5. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary. Vol. 1. International Critical Commentary. London: T & T Clark. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780567693532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780567693532

Wilson N. S. 2017. “The Interpretation of Ecclesiastes with Specific Reference to Qoheleth's Claims to Knowledge.” PhD diss., Durham University.