Impersonal Constructions in the Qur’an Indicating General Reference and Referential Flexibility

Yehudit Dror

doi:10.25159/2663-6573/22237

Authors

Yehudit Dror Department of Arabic Language and Literature https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5459-077X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6573/22237

Keywords:

impersonal constructions, Qurʾān, reference, referential flexibility

Abstract

This study examines the use of impersonal constructions in the Qur’an. Although these constructions are conventionally associated with identifiable participants, in certain qur’anic cases they can take on interpretations in which the reference extends beyond a specific individual or group to an unspecified individual or people in general. To date, no systematic linguistic analysis has investigated how these constructions function in the Qur’an as a whole. This study addressed this gap by identifying the linguistic and discursive conditions in which these pronouns act as generalised references. Three pronominal categories are dealt with: first-person forms, second-person masculine forms, and third-person masculine singular/plural forms. The analysis is based on a corpus of 100 constructions selected from approximately 200 potential constructions. Cases whose referents were recoverable from syntactic, discourse cues or the historical context were excluded. The interpretation of the impersonal constructions is based on qur’anic exegesis, primarily al-Ṭabarī’s exegesis. The findings show that qur’anic impersonal constructions do not arise from morphology alone or from the absence of a referent; rather, their interpretation derives from the interaction between grammatical form and discourse context. Impersonal constructions tend to be general when plural forms are used to refer to non-specific human participants or groups. By contrast, singular pronouns are often referentially flexible, and can simultaneously accommodate a specific contextual referent, such as the Prophet Muḥammad, and a more generic or non-specific referent. The choice of the impersonal form is closely associated with contexts related to instruction, dialogue, proclamation, and reflection, where the communicative situation encourages the hearer/reader to extend the referent beyond the immediately identifiable participant to a wider class of potential individuals.

References

Abdel Haleem, Muhammad. 1992. “Grammatical Shift for Rhetorical Purposes: Iltifāt and Related Features in the Qur'ān.” Bulletin of SOAS 55 (3): 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00003621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00003621

Abdel Haleem, Muhammad A. S. 2005. The Qur’an: A New Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Alhailawani, Mohammad, Waleed Othman, and Osama Abdel-Ghafer. 2022. “On the Feature (In)Deficiency of Dedicated Impersonal Pronouns: The View from Jordanian Arabic.” Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 7 (1): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.9367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.9367

Alhasan, Muhammed Muvaffak. 2024. “Features of Pragmatics Approaches of Interpreters in Orienting the Significance of Human to Human Address Forms in Holy Quran.” Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences 51 (1): 515–526. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v51i1.1637 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v51i1.1637

Azaiez, Mehdi. 2015. Le contre-discours coranique. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110419108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110419108

Badarneh, Muhammad A. 2003. “The Rhetorical Question as a Discursive and Stylistic Device in the Quran.” PhD diss., Arizona State University.

al-Bākistānī, Zakariyyā Ibn Ghulām Qādir. 2002. Min ʾuṣūl al-fiqh ʿalā manhaj ʾahl al-Ḥadīth. Jeddah: Dār al-Kharāz.

Dror, Yehudit. 2018. “The Structure of Legal Passages in the Qurʾān.” International Journal for the Rule of Law, Courtroom Procedures, Judicial Linguistics & Legal English 2: 73–107.

Gwynne, Rosalind Ward. 2017. “Patterns of Address.” In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to the Qurʾān, edited by A. Rippin and J. Mojaddedi, 82–96. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118964873.ch5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118964873.ch5

Halevy, Rivka. 2020. “Impersonal and Pseudo-Impersonal Constructions in Modern Hebrew.” In Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew. Background, Morpho-lexicon, and Syntax, edited by R. A. Berman, 539–582. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.210.16hal DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.210.16hal

Horovitz, Josef. 1926. Koranische Untersuchungen. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111557366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111557366

Jaelani, M. Irham, Pathur Rahman, and Sutrisno Hadi. 2025. “Al-‘Ibrah bi-ʿUmum al-Lafz lā bi- Khuṣūṣ al-Sabab: A Contextual and Realistic Analysis of Surah Al-Baqarah 178 from the Perspective of Wahbah Al-Zuhaili.” Jurnal Kajian Islam 2 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.56566/jki.v2i1.285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56566/jki.v2i1.285

Ibn Hishām, Jamāl al-Dīn al-ʾAnṣārī. 2000. ʾAwḍaḥ al-masālik ʾilā ʾalfiyyat Ibn Mālik. Beirut: Dār al-nashr wa-l-tawzīʿ.

Ibn Yaʿīsh, Muwaffaq al-Dīn ʾAbu al-Baqāʾ Ibn ʿAlī. 2001. Sharḥ al-mufaṣṣal. Beirut: Dār al-kutub al-ʿilmiyya.

Kitagawa, Chisato, and Adrienne Lehrer. 1990. “Impersonal Uses of Personal Pronouns.” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 739–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90004-W DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90004-W

Klar, Marianna. 2017. “Text-Critical Approaches to Sura Structure: Combining Synchronicity with Diachronicity in Sūrat al-Baqara. Part One.” Journal of Qurʾanic Studies 19 (1): 1–38. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2017.0267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2017.0267

Laberge, Suzanne, and Gillian Sankoff. 1979. “Anything You Can Do.” In Discourse and Syntax, edited by Talmy T. Givon, 419–440. New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368897_018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368897_018

Malchukov, Andrej, and Anna Siewierska. 2011. “Introduction.” In Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, edited by Andrej Malchukov and Anna Siewierska, 1–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.01mal

Melnik, Nurit. 2013. “Impersonal Constructions.” In Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, edited by G. Khan. Leiden: Brill Academic. https://doi.org/10.1163/2212-4241_ehll_EHLL_COM_00000486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/2212-4241_ehll_EHLL_COM_00000486

al-Mubarrad, ʾAbū ʿAbbās Muḥammad Ibn Yazīd. n.d. al-Muqtaḍab. Beirut: ʿĀlām al-kutub.

Myers, Greg, and Sofia Lampropoulou. 2012. “Impersonal You and Stance-Taking in Social Research Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (10): 1206–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.005

Naya, Belén Méndez, and Couso María José López. 1997. “What is Really Meant by ‘Impersonal?’ On ‘Impersonal’ and Related Terms.” Atlantis 19 (2): 185–192.

Neuwirth, Angelika. 2002. “Form and Structure of the Qurʾān.” In Encyclopedia of the Qurʾān, edited by J. D. McAuliffe, 245–266. Leiden: Brill.

Notarius, Tania. 2021. “Impersonal Verbal Constructions in Biblical Hebrew: Active, Stative, and Passive.” Journal for Semitics 30 (2). https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6573/9379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6573/9379

Rabin, Chaim. 1978. “Stylistic Variation in the Impersonal Construction in the Bible.” In Khikrey Lashon, edited by M. Bar Asher and B. Dan, 244–253. Jerusalem: The Israel Academy of the Hebrew Language.

Radscheit, Matthias. 1997. “Word of God of Prophetic Speech? Reflections on the Quranic qul-Statements.” In Encounters of Words and Texts: Intercultural Studies in Honor of Stefan Wild, edited by L. Edzard and Ch. Szyska, 33–43. New York: Georg Olms Verlag.

al-Rāzī, Muḥammad Fakhr al-Dīn. 2000. Mafātīḥ al-ghayb. Beirut: Dār al-kutub al-ʿilmiyya.

Retsö, Jan. 1982. “Subjectless Sentences in Arabic Dialects.” Orientalia Suecana 31–32: 71–91.

Robinson, Neal. 1996. Discovering the Qur’ān: A Contemporary Approach to a Veiled Text. London: SCM-Canterbury Press.

Samji, Karim. 2018. The Qurʾān: A Form-Critical History. Vol. 32. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110580884 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110580884

Shemesh, Rivka. 2009–2010. “A Sentence with an Indefinite (or Impersonal) Subject in Biblical Hebrew.” Khelkat Lashon 41: 9–35.

Siewierska, Anna. 2008. “Introduction: Impersonalization from a Subject‐Centred vs. Agent‐Centred Perspective.” Transactions of the Philological Society 106 (2): 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2008.00211.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2008.00211.x

Sinai, Nicolai. 2022. “Towards a Compositional Grammar of the Medinan Suras.” In Unlocking the Medinan Qur’an, edited by N. Sinai, 15–56. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004509702_003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004509702_003

Stewart, Devin J. 2022. “Vocatives in the Qurʾan and the Framing of Prophetic Proclamations.” In Unlocking the Medinan Qur’an, edited by N. Sinai, 199–248. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004509702_007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004509702_007

al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn. 2005. al-ʾItqān fī ʿulūm al-Qurʾān. Medina: Majmaʿ al-malik fahd.

al-Ṭabarī, ʾAbū Jaʿfar Muḥammad Ibn Jarīr. 1995. Jāmiʿ al-bayān ʿan taʾwīl ʾāy al-Qurʾān, Beirut: Dār al-fikr li-l-ṭibāʿa wa-l-nashr wa-l-tawzīʿ.

Ullah, Saeed, and Khurram Shehzad Zafar. 2025. “Linguistics Accommodation in the Holy Quran: An Analysis of Pragmatic Strategies Used for a Diverse Audience in the Quranic Language.” Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL 8 (3): 590–601. https://doi.org/10.63878/jalt1012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63878/jalt1012

Wansbrough, John E. 2004. Qurʾānic Studies: Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

al-Zamakhsharī, ʾAbū al-Qāsim Muḥammad Ibn ʿUmar. 1987. al-Kashshāf ʿan ḥaqāʾiq ghawāmiḍ al- tanzīl. Beirut: Dār al-kutub al-ʿarabī.

al-Zarkashī, Badr al-Dīn. 1957. al-Burhān fī ʿulūm al-Qurʾān. Cairo: Dār ʾiḥyāʾ al-kutub al-ʿarabiyya.

Zobel, Sarah. 2016. “A Pragmatic Analysis of German Impersonally Used First Person Singular ‘ICH’.” Pragmatics 26 (3): 379–416. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.26.3.03zob DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.26.3.03zob