LONGING FOR BELONGING BEYOND BELONGINGS: THE ECONOMICS OF SONG OF SONGS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/1013-8471/2544Abstract
The intimate and “monogamous†eroticism in the Song of Songs can be considered as a critique of economic materialism where multiple women may be “bought†in some sense or another. It is the female lover, however, who regards the lovers as belonging to each other and visualises her beloved’s body as made up of precious metals and gemstones which she then owns. It therefore appears that this protest is partially self-subversive in that it equates the celebrated body with the very currency it sets out to denounce. Added to that is the body with its boundaries imaged as a building blocking out unwanted intrusions and so as expression of private property. This conflict of class psychologies might therefore contain an element of envy and the question can be asked which party is actually compensating by overinvestment for unmet needs.Metrics
References
Barbiero, G 2011. Song of Songs: a close reading. Translated by Michael Tait. Leiden: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004203259.i-542
Barzoki, M, Tavakol, M & Vahidnia, A 2014. Effects of sexual objctification on conspicuous
consumption and materialism, Sexuality Research and Social Policy 11:153–162.
Belk, R W 1985. Trait aspects of living in the material world, Journal of Consumer Research 12:265–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/208515
Berquist, J L 1998. Controlling daughters’ bodies in Sirach, in Wyke 1998:95–120.
Binet, A 1887. Du fétichisme dans l'amour, Revue Philosophique 24:143–167.
Csikszentmihalyi, M 2004. Materialism and the evolution of consciousness, in Kasser and Kanner 2004:91–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10658-006
De Villiers, D W 1998. Die funksie van die ‘besweringsrefrein’ in Hooglied. Unpublished DTh thesis. Pretoria: University of South Africa.
Dittmar, H 1992. The social psychology of material possessions: to have is to be. New York: St. Martin’s.
Donne, V D 2012. Die Schönheit der Lyrik Psychologisch Erklärt: Unbestimmtheit, Assoziationen und die Ästhetik der Sprache. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Ferenczi, S 1974. The ontogenesis of the interest in money, in Halloway and Fuller 1974:264–272.
Fox, M V 1985. The Song of Songs and the ancient Egyptian love songs. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
Freud, S 1974. Drei Abhandlungen zur Sexualtheorie und verwandte Schriften. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer.
_______ 1977. Character and anal eroticism, in Richards 1977:205–215.
Fromm, E 1976. To have or to be? New York: Harper & Row.
Furnham, A 1984. Many sides of the coin: the psychology of money usage, Personality and Individual Difference, 5/5:501–509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(84)90025-4
Gordis, R 1974. The Song of Songs and Lamentations: a study, modern translation and commentary. New York: Ktav.
Halloway, J & Fuller, P 1974. The psychology of gambling. London: Lane.
Kasser, T and Kanner, A D (eds) 2004. Psychology and consumer culture: the struggle for a good life in a materialistic world. Washington: American Psychological Association. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10658-000
Keel, O 1986. Das Hohelied. Zürich: Theologische Verlag.
Kilbourne, G & Foley, J 2005. A cross-cultural examination of the relationship between materialism and individual values, Journal of Economic Psychology, 26:624–641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2004.12.009
Kingsmill, E 2009. The Song of Songs and the eros of God: a study in biblical intertextuality. Oxford: OUP.
Lacocque, A 1998. Romance she wrote: a hermeneutical essay on Song of Songs. Harrisburg: Trinity.
Marx, K 1930. Capital: a critique of political economy. Volume 1. London: Dent.
Maslow, A H 1943. A theory of human motivation, Psychological review 50/4:370–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
Pope, M H 1977. Song of Songs: a new translation with introduction and commentary. New York: Doubleday. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780300261189
Richards, A (ed.) 1977. On sexuality: Volume 7. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Richins, M L 1994. Valuing things: the public and the private meanings of possessions, Journal of Consumer Research 21:504–521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209414
Ringgren, H 1981. Das Hohe Lied, Klagelieder, das Buch Esther. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Smith, W R 1879. Animal worship and animal tribes among the Arabs and in the Hebrew Bible, Journal of Philology 9:75–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139523622.009
Tromp, N 1985. De twee sleutels van het Hooglied: het wek- en sjaloom-motief, Nederlands DOI: https://doi.org/10.5117/NTT1985.39.006.TROM
Theologisch Tijdschrift 39:89–101.
Van der Zwan, P 2014. Song of Songs: from transcending to transcendental sex (1), Journal for Semitics 23/2ii:841–860.
Viviers, H 1989. Die besweringsrefrein in Hooglied 2: 7, 3: 5 en 8: 4 – ‘moenie die liefde rypdruk nie’ of ‘steur ons nie in ons liefde nie’, Skrif en kerk 10/1:80–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v10i1.999
Wallendorf, M & Arnould, E J 1988. ‘My favorite things’: a cross-cultural inquiry into object attachment, possessiveness, and social linkage, Journal of Consumer Research 14/4:531–547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209134
Wyke, M (ed.) 1998. Parchments of gender: deciphering the bodies of antiquity. Oxford: Clarendon.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
