DANIEL 3, CONTESTING SPACE FOR CLASHING IMAGES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/1013-8471/2771Abstract
It becomes clear that the narrative of Daniel 3 is part of a larger narrative that already starts in Daniel 1 when one applies a spatial-body-frameset to the story. Utilising spatial markers, the author of Daniel 3 demonstrates to his readers that the God of Israel indeed has the ability to operate inside the spatial authority (domain) of foreign gods. The narrative is not so much a question of Elohim’s ability to protect his people from death; it rather asks which deity has authority over the plain of Dura. Due to Elohim’s rescue of the three men, the fiery furnace cognitively becomes an image of Elohim’s god-space and power. In this way the author indicates that the plain of Dura does not belong to the authority domain of Marduk, but to the god-space of the God of Israel. Daniel 3 is not a story about three faithful men, but rather a story about the God of Israel. In his own manner the author attempts to persuade his readers that Elohim’s authority is universal, and not restricted to a particular spatial context.Metrics
References
Aalders, G C 1962. Daniël. Kampen: N.V. Uitgeversmaatschappij JH Kok.
Abusch, T 1995. Marduk, in van der Toorn, Becking & van der Horst 1995:1014-1025.
Albertz, R 2003. Israel in exile. The history and literature of the sixth century B.C.E. Translated by David Green. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.
Barton, J 1984. Reading the Old Testament. Method in biblical study. London:Darton Longman and Todd.
Becker, U 2005. Exegese des Alten Testaments. Stuttgart: Mohr Siebeck.
Becking, B & Peels, E (eds.) 2007. Oudtestamentische Studiën, Vol. 55. Leiden: Brill.
Bickerman, E 1979. The God of the Maccabees. Translated by H.R. Moehring. Leiden: EJ Brill.
Calvin, J 1852. Commentaries on the book of the prophet Daniel. Translated by Thomas Myers. Edinburgh: Calvin Translation Society.
Clendenen, E R (ed.) 1994. The New American Commentary. Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers.
Collins, J J 1993. Daniel. Hermeneia (Ed. FM Cross), Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Croft, W & Cruse, D 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864
Curtis, A H W 2007. “Our Father...â€: An inherited title and its presence (or absence) in the Psalms?, in Becking & Peels 2007:45-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004160323.i-306.16
De Bruyn, J J 2012.Creating God’s own right-hand man – A cognitive linguistic approach to Psalm 110, Ekklesiastikos Pharos 94/23:456-470.
_______ 2014. A clash of gods – conceptualising space in Daniel 1, HTS Teologiese Studies/Thelogical Studies 70/1:publication in print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v70i3.1956
Fee, G D & Stuart, D 2002. How to read the Bible book by book. A guided tour.Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan.
Evans, V, Bergen, B & Zinken, J 2007. The cognitive linguistics reader. London: Equinox.
Evans, V C & Green, M 2006. Cognitive linguistics. An introductuction. London: LEA.
Farrar, F W 1979. The expositor’s Bible. Vol. 4. W Robertson Nicoll (ed.). New York: George H Doran Company.
Fee, G D & Stuart, D 2002. How to read the Bible book by book. A guided tour.Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan.
Geeraets, D & Cuyckens, H 2007. The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gertz, J C, Berlejung, A, Schmid, K and Witte, M (Eds.) 2012. T&T Clark Handbook of the Old Testament. New York: T&T Clark.
Hayes, J H & Holladay, C R [1982] 2007. Biblical exegesis. A beginner’s handbook. Third Edition. Louisville, London: Westminster John Knox Press.
Hartman, L F & Di Lella, A A 1978. The Book of Daniel. New York, NY: Doubleday & Company.
Haspelmath, M 1997. From space to time. Temporal adverbials in the world’s languages. München, Newcastle: Lincom Europa
Hossfeld, FL & Zenger, E 2005.Psalms 3: A commentary on Psalms 101-150. Hermeneia: a Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible, Klaus Baltzer (ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
Human, D J (ed.) 2007. Psalms and mythology. London: T & T Clark.
Humphreys, W L 1990. Crisis and story. Introduction to the Old Testament. Illustrated Edition. New York City: McGraw-Hill.
Jeffery, A & Kennedy, G 1956.The Book of Daniel, in Keck 1956:341-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1956.tb01595.x
Jordaan PJ & Nolte SP 2010. Susanna: A story of dangerous spaces. Journal for Semitics, 19/2:527-547.
Keck, L E (ed.) 1956. The Interpreter’s Bible. Volume VI. Nashville: Abingdon Press.
_______ 1996. The New Interpreter’s Bible. Volume VII. Nashville: Abingdon Press.
Low, S M & Lawrence-Zúñiga, D 2003 The anthropology of space and place. Locating culture. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Merleau-Ponty, M 2005. Phenomenology of perception. Translated by Colin Smith. New York, NY: Routledge.
Miller, S R 1994. The new American commentary: Daniel. Nashville: B&H Publishing.
Murphy, F J 2002. Early Judaism: The exile to the time of Jesus. Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers, Inc.
Preuss, H D 1984. Das Alte Testament in christlicher Predigt. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
Smith-Christopher, D L 1996. The Book of Daniel, in Keck 1996:17-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1996.tb02310.x
Steinmann, A E 2008.Daniel. Saint Louis: Concordia Publishing House.
Tcherikover, V [1959] 1982. Hellenistic civilization and the Jews. 6th edition. New York: A Temple Book.
Towner, W S 1984. Interpretation. A Bible commentary for teaching and preaching. Daniel. Atlanta, Georgia: John Knox Press.
Usue, E O 2007. Theological-mythological viewpoints on divine sonship in Genesis 6 and Psalm 2, in Human 2007:77-90.
Van der Toorn, K, Becking, B & van der Horst, P W (eds.)1995. Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible. Leiden: EJ Brill.
Van Groningen, G 1990. Messianic revelation in the Old Testament. Michigan: Baker Book House.
Walton, J H 2006. Ancient Near Eastern thought and the Old Testament. Introducing the conceptual world of the Hebrew Bible. Ada, MI: Baker Academic.
Witte, M 2012. The Book of Daniel, in Gertz et al. 2012:643-668.
Zlatev, J 2007. Spatial semantics, in Geeraets & Cuyckens2007:318-350. WYU’