The Varieties of DSS Hebrew as Reflected in Two Syntactic Traits, and the Sociolinguistic Situation Underlying the Qumran Hebrew Variety

SBL Annual Meeting 2020 Linguistics and Biblical Hebrew Seminar: Samaritan Hebrew and Dialectal Diversity in Second Temple Hebrew

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6573/9325

Keywords:

syntax, object marker, word order, end-focus, genres, Dead Sea Scrolls

Abstract

This paper offers a provisional evaluation of both the use of the particle ’et preceding a nominal functioning as a direct object and of the reversed word order, as these two groups of syntactic hallmarks are often regarded to be emphatic. The first part of this paper describes a selection of cases from Manuscript a of the Isaiah Scroll (1QIsaa) in which ’et is used differently compared with the Masoretic book of Isaiah (MT). Next, it provides selected examples within non-biblical Dead Sea Scrolls, in order to investigate the double direct object and the shift in verb complementation. The second part of this paper deals with four categories affected by the phenomenon of reversed word order in both the biblical and non-biblical DSS, i.e., subject preceding the verb, direct object preceding the infinitive, apposition, and binary expressions. The conclusion suggests two alternatives to emphasis as the main cause of the alleged idiosyncrasies in the use of ’et and in reversed word order, respectively. The results reveal some insights into the increased frequency of the particle ’et both in the biblical and non-biblical DSS, under certain syntactic circumstances, and into the shift from initial-focus to end-focus in a number of categories—albeit in a transitional stage—prevalent in non-biblical DSS.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ben-Hayyim, Z. 1954. Studies in the Traditions of the Hebrew Language. Madrid: Arias Montano.

Blau, J. 2000. “A Conservative View of the Language of the Dead Sea Scrolls.” In Diggers at the Well: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Ben Sira, edited by T. Muraoka and J. F. Elwolde, 20–25. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004350373_006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004350373_006

Brockelmann, C. 1956. Hebräische Syntax. Neukirchhen Kreis Moers: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Erziehungsvereins.

Brown, F., Driver, S. R. and Briggs, C. A. 2010. The Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon: With an Appendix Containing the Biblical Aramaic; Coded with the Numbering System from Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, [Nachdr.] Reprinted from the 1906 ed. Peabody. Mass: Hendrickson Publishers.

Clines, D. J. A., ed. 1993. The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.

Fassberg, S. 2000. “The Syntax of the Biblical Documents from the Judean Desert as Reflected in a Comparison of Multiple Copies of Biblical Texts.” In Diggers at the Well: Proceedings of a Third International Symposium on the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Ben Sira, edited by T. Muraoka and J. F. Elwolde, 94–109. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004350373_012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004350373_012

Fassberg, S. 2013. “Shifts in Word Order in the Hebrew of the Second Temple Period.” In Hebrew in the Second Temple Period, edited by S. E. Fassberg, M. Bar-Asher and R. A. Clements, 57–71. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004254794_006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004254794_006

García Martínez, F., and Tigchelaar, E. J. C. (eds.). 1999. The Dead Sea Scrolls: Study Edition. Leiden: Brill.

Hornkohl, A. D. 2013. Ancient Hebrew Periodization and the Language of the Book of Jeremiah. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004269651 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004269651

Joüon, P., and Muraoka, T. 2009. A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew: Second Reprint of the Second Edition, with Corrections. Roma: Gregorian & Biblical Press.

Kautzsch, W. (ed.). 1910. Gesenius’ Hebrew Grammar. Translated by A. E. Cowley. Oxford: Clarendon. (GKC)

Khan, G. 1984. “Object Markers and Agreement Pronouns in Semitic Languages.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 47 (3): 468–500. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00113709 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00113709

Kutscher, E. Y. 1974. The Language and Linguistic Background of the Isaiah Scroll: (I Q Isaa). Leiden: Brill (originally published in Hebrew, Jerusalem: Magnes, 1959). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004350052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004350052

Kutscher, E. Y. 1982. A History of the Hebrew Language, edited by R. Kutscher. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

Kutscher, E. Y. 2007. “The Dead Sea Scrolls.” In Encyclopaedia Judaica 2nd Edition, edited by von F. Skolnik, vol. 8, 634–39. Detroit: Thomson Gale.

Leahy, T. S. J. 1960. “Studies in the Syntax of 1QS.” Biblica 41: 135–57.

MacDonald, J. 1964. “The Particle 't in Classical Hebrew.” Vetus Testamentum 14 (3): 263–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/1516424 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1516424

Morag, S. 1988. “Qumran Hebrew: Some Typological Observations.” Vetus Testamentum 38 (2): 148–64. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853388X00355 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853388X00355

Moshavi, A. 2013. “Word Order: Biblical Hebrew.” In Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, edited by G. Khan, vol. 3, 991–98. Leiden: Brill.

Muraoka, T. 1985. Emphatic Words and Structures in Biblical Hebrew. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004433496 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004433496

Park, M. 2003. “Repetition and Non-Repetition of Particles in Biblical Hebrew and the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls.” PhD diss., The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Qimron, E. 1992. “Observations on the History of Early Hebrew (1000 B.C.E.-200 C.E.) in the Light of the Dead Sea Documents.” In The Dead Sea Scrolls: Forty Years of Research, edited by D. Dimant and U. Rappaport, 349–61. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004350113_033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004350113_033

Qimron, E. 2000. “The Nature of DSS Hebrew and Its Relation to BH and MH.” In Diggers at the Well: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Ben Sira, edited by T. Muraoka and J. F. Elwolde, 232–44. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004350373_021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004350373_021

Qimron, E. 2018. A Grammar of the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Jerusalem: Yad Yizhak Ben-Zvi.

Samet, N. 2020. “Non-Accusative 't and the Syntactic Profile of Late Biblical Hebrew.” Vetus Testamentum 70: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685330-12341446 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685330-12341446

Saydon, P. P. 1964. “Meanings and Uses of the Particle 't.” Vetus Testamentum 14 (2): 192–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/1516381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1516381

Schniedewind, W. M. 1999. “Qumran Hebrew as an Antilanguage.” Journal of Biblical Literature 118: 235–252. https://doi.org/10.2307/3268005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3268005

Screnock, J. 2011. “Word Order in the War Scroll (1QM) and its Implications for Interpretation.” Dead Sea Discoveries 18: 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851711X551563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156851711X551563

Siegismund, K. 2018. “Once Again on Word Order in the War Scroll (1QM).” Dead Sea Discoveries 25: 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685179-12341452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685179-12341452

Talshir, D. 2013. “Syndetic Binominals in Second Temple Period Hebrew.” In Hebrew in the Second Temple Period: The Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls and of Other Contemporary Sources, edited by S. E. Fassberg, M. Bar-Asher and R. A. Clements, 225–38. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004254794_017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004254794_017

Tov, E. 1986. “The Orthography and Language of the Hebrew Scrolls Found at Qumran and the Origin of These Scrolls.” In Textus: Studies of the Hebrew University Bible Project, edited by E. Tov, 31–57. Jerusalem: Magnes Press.

https://doi.org/10.1163/2589255X-01301003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/2589255X-01301003

Walker, N. 1955. “Concerning the Function of 'et.” Vetus Testamentum 5: 314–15. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853355X00342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853355X00342

Published

2022-01-27

How to Cite

Colasuonno, Maria Maddalena. 2021. “The Varieties of DSS Hebrew As Reflected in Two Syntactic Traits, and the Sociolinguistic Situation Underlying the Qumran Hebrew Variety: SBL Annual Meeting 2020 Linguistics and Biblical Hebrew Seminar: Samaritan Hebrew and Dialectal Diversity in Second Temple Hebrew”. Journal for Semitics 30 (2):20 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6573/9325.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2021-04-01
Accepted 2021-08-04
Published 2022-01-27