Impersonal Verbal Constructions in Biblical Hebrew: Active, Stative, and Passive

SBL Annual Meeting 2020 Linguistics and Biblical Hebrew Seminar: Linguistic Variation in Biblical Hebrew

Authors

  • Tania Notarius Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel; University of the Free State, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6573/9379

Keywords:

Biblical Hebrew, syntax, subject, impersonal clause, passive, stative

Abstract

In this paper I focus on the syntactic properties of subjects in impersonal verbal constructions in Biblical Hebrew. It is claimed that four types of subjectless verbal clauses—active finite and participial plural, active finite singular, passive, and stative—feature three types of impersonal subject: covert indefinite pronoun, inflectional morpheme, and zero-subject. It will be demonstrated that these subjects have different, only partly overlapping syntactic properties:

  • The covert indefinite pronoun implies an animate subject that does not necessitate “collective interpretation” and can have generic scope; the subject can be topicalised, negated, and relativised, the verbal predicate is temporally vague.
  • The 3rd masculine plural inflectional morpheme implies an animate collective subject; it can be controlled from the matrix clause and be used for participant tracking and anaphora; the verbal predicate is quite precisely anchored in time.
  • The dummy zero-subject has no explicit subject properties; it can be theorised that the syntactic slot of a subject is taken by an overt cognate argument (Cause or Theme) of stative or passive verbs, but practically such a subject leaves no syntactic traces.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abraham, Werner. 2006. “Passivization and Typology: Form vs. Function, a Confined Survey into the Research Status Quo.” In Passivization and Typology. Form and Function, edited by Werner Abraham and L. Leisiö, 1–29. Typological Studies in Language 68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.68.03abr DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.68.03abr

Abraham, Werner. 2011. “Verbs of Motion: Impersonal Passivization between Unaccusativity and Unergativity.” In Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, edited by Andrej Malchukov and Anna Siewierska, 91–126. Studies in Language Companion Series 124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.04abr DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.04abr

Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2014. “The Semantics of the Impersonal Construction in Icelandic, German and Faroese: Beyond Thematic Roles.” In Focus on Germanic Typology, edited by Werner Abraham, 105–37. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

Bergsträsser, Gotthelf. 1962. Hebräische Grammatik. 2 vols. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.

Berman, Ruth. 1980. “The Case of an (S)VO Language: Subjectless Constructions in Modern Hebrew.” Language 56: 759–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/413487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/413487

Berman, Ruth. 2011. “Revisiting Impersonal Constructions in Modern Hebrew.” In Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, edited by Andrej Malchukov and Anna Siewierska, 323–56. Studies in Language Companion Series 124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.12ber DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.12ber

Bhatt, Rajesh, and Roumyana Pancheva. 2017. “Implicit Arguments.” In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, edited by Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 1–35. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom118

Blau, Joshua. 1955. “The Accusative ’Alif as an Indication of Subject and Predicate in Judeo-Arabic Texts.” Tarbiz 25: 27–35.

Blau, Joshua. 1966. A Grammar of Christian Arabic, Based Mainly on South-Palestinian Texts from the First Millennium. Louvain: Secrétariat du Corpus SCO.

Blau, Joshua. 1981. The Emergence and Linguistic Background of Judaeo-Arabic: A Study of the Origins of Middle Arabic. Leiden: Brill.

Bresnan, Joan. 1994. “Locative Inversion and the Architecture of Universal Grammar.” Language 70 (1): 72–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/416741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/416741

Brockelmann, Carl. 1956. Hebräische Syntax. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag.

Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia. 2003. “Arbitrary Readings of 3 Pl Pronominals.” In Proceedings of the Conference Sinn und Bedeutung 7, edited by Matthias Weisgerber, 81–94. Arbeitspapiere des Fachbereichs Sprachwissenschaften 114. Universität Konstanz: FB Linguistik.

Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia. 2006. ‘“Arbitrary’ Pro and the Theory of Pro Drop.” In Arguments and Agreement, edited by Peter Acherma, Patrick Brandt, Maaike Schoorlemmer, and Fred Weermann, 230–58. Oxford University Press.

Doron, Edit. 2020. “The Biblical Hebrew Infinitive.” Brill’s Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 12 (1): 119–50. https://doi.org/10.1163/18776930-01201007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18776930-01201007

Eidevall, Göran. 2017. Amos: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. Anchor Bible. New Haven: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1vgwbb6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1vgwbb6

Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2014. “Information Structure and (In)Definiteness.” In Crosslinguistic Studies on Noun Phrase Structure and Reference, edited by Patricia Cabredo Hofherr and Anne Zribi-Hertz, 23–51. Syntax and Semantics 39. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004261440_003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004261440_003

Fernández-Soriano, Olga. 1999. “Two Types of Impersonal Sentences in Spanish: Locative and Dative Subjects.” Syntax 2 (2): 101–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00017

Fleisch, Henri. 1957. “Études sur le verbe arabe.” In Mélanges Louis Massignon, 153–81. Damas: Institut français de Damas.

Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1982. “Indefinite Agent, Impersonal, and Passive: A Functional Approach.” Lingua 58: 267–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(82)90036-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(82)90036-5

Frascarelli, Mara, and Roland Hinterhölzl. 2007. “Types of Topics in German and Italian.” In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form: Generalizations across Languages, edited by Kerstin Schwabe and Susanne Winkler, 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.100.07fra DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/la.100.07fra

Gast, Volker, and Johan van der Auwera. 2013. “Towards a Distributional Typology of Human Impersonal Pronouns, Based on Data from European Languages.” In Languages Across Boundaries, edited by D. Bakker and Martin Haspelmath, 119–58. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110331127.119

Gesenius, Wilhelm, E. Kautzsch, and Arthur Ernest Cowley. 1910. Gesenius’ Hebrew Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Goldenberg, Gidon. 2013. Semitic Languages: Features, Structures, Relations, Processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Halevy, Rivka. 2020. “Chapter 15. Impersonal and Pseudo-Impersonal Constructions.” In Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew: Background, Morpho-Lexicon, and Syntax, edited by Ruth Berman, 539–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.210.16hal DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.210.16hal

Haspelmath, Martin. 1990. “The Grammaticalization of Passive Morphology.” Studies in Language 14: 25–72. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14.1.03has DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14.1.03has

Haspelmath, Martin. 2001. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hasselbach, Rebecca. 2013. Case in Semitic: Roles, Relations, and Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671809.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671809.001.0001

Hewitt, Steve. 2002. “The Impersonal in Breton.” Journal of Celtic Linguistics 7:1–39.

Joüon, Paul, and Takamitsu Muraoka. 2006. A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew. Rome: Gregorian Biblical Book.

Keenan, Edward L. 1976. “Towards a Universal Definition of Subject.” In Subject and Topic, edited by Charles Li, 303–34. New York: Academic Press.

Keenan, Edward L., and Matthew S. Dryer. 2007. “Passive in the World’s Languages.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1: Clause Structure, edited by Timothy Shopen, 325–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619427.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619427.006

Khan, Geoffrey. 1984. “Object Markers and Agreement Pronouns in Semitic Languages.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 47 (3): 468–500. https://doi:.org/10.1017/S0041977X00113709 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00113709

Lavidas, Nikolaos. 2015. “Cognate Arguments and the Transitivity Requirement in the History of English.” Lingua Posnaniensis 56 (2): 41–59. https://doi.org/10.2478/linpo-2014-0013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/linpo-2014-0013

Levin, Beth, and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Loretz, Oswald. 1989. “Amos VI 12.” Vetus Testamentum 39 (2): 240–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519582 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853389X00129

Malchukov, Andrej, and Akio Ogawa. 2011. “Towards a Typology of Impersonal Constructions: A Semantic Map Approach.” In Impersonals Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, edited by Andrej Malchukov and Anna Siewierska, 19–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.02mal

Melnik, Nurit. 2013. “Impersonal Constructions.” In Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, edited by Geoffrey Khan. Leiden: Brill.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/2212-4241_ehll_EHLL_COM_00000486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/2212-4241_ehll_EHLL_COM_00000486

Mor, Uri, and Na’ama Pat-El. 2016. “The Development of Predicates with Prepositional Subjects in Hebrew.” Journal of Semitic Studies 61: 327–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgw016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgw016

Notarius, Tania. 2013. The Verb in Archaic Biblical Poetry: A Discursive, Typological, and Historical Investigation of the Tense System. Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253353

Palmer, Frank Robert. 1994. Grammatical Roles and Relations. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pat-El, Na’ama. 2018. “The Diachrony on Non-Canonical Subjects in Northwest Semitic.” In Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects, edited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Na’ama Pat-El, and Stephen M. Carey, 155–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.200.07pat DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.200.07pat

Paul, Shalom M. 1991. Amos: A Commentary of the Book of Amos. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

Peled, Yishai. 2004. “Accusatival Subjects in Arabic Nontransitive Constructions and the Unaccusative Hypothesis.” Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 29: 111–35.

Rabin, Chaim. 1962. “The Ancient Versions and the Indefinite Subject.” Textus 2 (1): 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1163/2589255X-00201006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/2589255X-00201006

Rainey, Anson F. 1996. Canaanite in the Amarna Tablets: A Linguistic Analysis of the Mixed Dialect Used by the Scribes from Canaan. Vol. II: Morphosyntactic Analysis of the Verbal System. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004293991 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004293991

Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. “Pragmatics and Linguistics: An Analysis of Sentence Topics.” Philosophica 27: 53–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82606

Retsö, Jan. 1982. “Subjectless Sentences in Arabic Dialects.” Orientalia Suecana 31–32: 71–91.

Retsö, Jan. 1989. Diathesis in the Semitic Languages: A Comparative Morphological Study. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004348264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004348264

Rosén, Haiim B. 1977. Contemporary Hebrew. The Hague: Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804836

Samet, Nili. 2020. “Non-Accusative 't and the Syntactic Profile of Late Biblical Hebrew.” Vetus Testamentum 71 (2): 233–50. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685330-12341446 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685330-12341446

Sansò, A. 2006. “Agent Defocusing Revisited. Passive and Impersonal Constructions in Some European Languages.” In Passivization and Typology: Form and Function, edited by Werner Abraham and L. Leisiö, 232–73. Typological Studies in Language 68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.68.15san DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.68.15san

Segal, Moses H. 1927. A Grammar of Mishnaic Hebrew. Oxford: Clarendon.

Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. “Passives and Related Constructions: A Prototype Analysis.” Language 61 (4): 821–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/414491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/414491

Siewierska, Anna. 2008. “Impersonalization from a Subject-Centered vs. Agent-Centered Perspective.” Transactions of the Philological Society 106: 115–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2008.00211.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2008.00211.x

Siewierska, Anna. 2010. “From Third Plural to Passive: Incipient, Emergent and Stablished Passives.” Diachronica 27: 73–109. https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.27.1.03sie DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.27.1.03sie

Siewierska, Anna. 2011. “Overlap and Complementarity in Reference Impersonals: Man-Constructions vs. Third Person Plural-Impersonals in the Languages of Europe.” In Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, edited by Andrej Malchukov and Anna Siewierska, 57–90. Studies in Language Companion Series 124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.03sie DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.03sie

Siewierska, Anna, and Maria Papastathi. 2011. “Towards a Typology of Third Person Plural Impersonals.” Linguistics 49: 575–610. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.018

Stein, David. 2008. “The Noun 'îš in Biblical Hebrew: A Term of Affiliation.” Journal of Hebrew Scriptures 8. https://doi.org/10.5508/jhs.2008.v8.a1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5508/jhs.2008.v8.a1

Waltke, Bruce K., and Michael Patrick O’Connor. 1990. An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.

Zewi, Tamar. 1997. “Subjects Preceded by the Preposition ’et in Biblical Hebrew.” In Studien zur hebräischen Grammatik, edited by Andreas Wagner, 171–83. Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis 156. Goettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Zúniga, Fernando, and Seppo Kittilä. 2019. Grammatical Voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316671399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316671399

Ben-David, Aba. Lashon Mikra ve-lashon hakhamim. 2 vols. Tel-Aviv: Dvir.

Fasberg, Shmuel. 2019. Mavo le-tahbir lashon ha-Mikra. Sifriyat ha-Entsiklopedyah ha-Mikra’it 36. Yerushalayim: Mosad Bialik.

Rabin, Chaim. 1999. Gi’un signoni be-guf ha-stami ba-Mikra. In ‘Hikre lashon’, 53-244. Yerushalayim: Mosad Bialik.

Shemesh-Raskin, Rivka. 2009. “Ha-Mishpat ba’al ha-nose ha-stami be-lashon ha-Mishnah.” Helkat Lashon 41: 9-35.

Published

2022-01-31

How to Cite

Notarius, Tania. 2021. “Impersonal Verbal Constructions in Biblical Hebrew: Active, Stative, and Passive: SBL Annual Meeting 2020 Linguistics and Biblical Hebrew Seminar: Linguistic Variation in Biblical Hebrew”. Journal for Semitics 30 (2):33 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6573/9379.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2021-04-20
Accepted 2021-10-03
Published 2022-01-31