Innovative Morphological Distinctions in  Verbal Forms in the Samaritan and Tiberian  Reading Traditions of Biblical Hebrew: SBL Annual Meeting 2020 Linguistics and Biblical Hebrew Seminar: Samaritan Hebrew and Dialectal Diversity in Second Temple Hebrew

Geoffrey Khan

doi:10.25159/2663-6573/9494

Authors

Geoffrey Khan University of Cambridge

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6573/9494

Keywords:

Samaritan, Tiberian, participle, reading tradition, linguistic innovation

Abstract

The Samaritan oral tradition of the Pentateuch reflects a wider range of morphological forms of the qal active participle than the Tiberian tradition. Several of these are innovations borrowed from Aramaic. In some cases the Samaritan tradition exploits its larger pool of morphological patterns of the participle to express semantic distinctions that are not expressed in the morphology of the Tiberian tradition. The central semantic distinction that is expressed is between participles of a nominal character that express time-stable properties and those of a verbal character that express contingent properties. This same process can be identified in several places in the Tiberian tradition. This casts light on the interpretation tradition of the forms in question in the Tiberian tradition.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ben-Hayyim, Zeev. 2000. A Grammar of Samaritan Hebrew: Based on the Recitation of the Law in Comparison with the Tiberian and Other Jewish Traditions. Jerusalem: Hebrew University Magnes Press.

Ben-Hayyim, Zeev. 1957–77. The Literary and Oral Tradition of Hebrew and Aramaic amongst the Samaritans. Jerusalem: Bialik Institute, Academy of the Hebrew Language. 5 vols.

Bowman, John. 1975. The Samaritan Problem. Studies in the Relationships of Samaritanism, Judaism, and Early Christianity. Pittsburgh Theological Monograph Series 4. Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick Publications.

Boyarin, Daniel. 1988. “Towards the Talmudic Lexicon IV.” In Studies in Hebrew and Arabic in Memory of Dov Eron, edited by Aron Dotan, 63–75. Te'uda 6. Tel-Aviv: Tel-Aviv University.

Cohen, David. 1984. La phrase nominale et l’évolution du système verbal en Sémitique: Études de syntaxe historique. Collection Linguistique (Société de Linguistique de Paris). Leuven: Peeters.

Driver, Godfrey R. 1955. “Hebrew Mothers (Exodus i 19).” Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 67: 246–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/zatw.1955.67.1.246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zatw.1955.67.1.246

Florentin, Moshe. 1996. “Studies in the Morphology of Samaritan Hebrew.” Lesonenu 59: 217–41.

Gesenius, Wilhelm. 1910. Gesenius’ Hebrew Grammar. 2nd English ed. rev. Oxford: University Press.

Jastrow, Marcus. 1903. Dictionary of the Targumim, the Talmud Babli and Yerushalmi, and the Midrashic Literature. London: Luzac.

Joüon, Paul, and Takamitsu Muraoka. 2011. A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew. Third Reprint of the Second Edition, with Corrections. Rome: Gregorian and Biblical Press.

Khan, Geoffrey. 2007. “Indicative Markers in North Eastern Neo-Aramaic.” In XII Incontro Italiano Di Linguistica Camito-semitica (Afroasiatica). Atti, edited by Marco Moriggi, 85–97. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.

Khan, Geoffrey. 2020. The Tiberian Pronunciation Tradition of Biblical Hebrew: Including a Critical Edition and English Translation of the Sections on Consonants and Vowels in the Masoretic Treatise Hidayat al-Qari.“Guide for the Reader.” 2 vols. Cambridge Semitic Languages and Cultures 1. Cambridge: University of Cambridge & Open Book Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0163.01

Morag, Shelomo. 1974. “On the Historical Validity of the Vocalization of the Hebrew Bible.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 94: 307–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/600065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/600065

Van der Merwe, Christo H. J., Jacobus A. Naudé, and Jan H. Kroeze. 2017. A Biblical Hebrew Reference Grammar. 2nd ed. London-New York: Bloomsbury.

Yalon, Hanoch. 1964. Introduction to the Vocalization of the Mishna. Jerusalem: Bialik Institute (in Hebrew).

Yeivin, Israel. 1985. The Hebrew Language Tradition as Reflected in the Babylonian Vocalization. Jerusalem: The Academy of the Hebrew Language (in Hebrew).