Unipolar Conceptual Metaphors in Biblical Hebrew

At Lamprecht

doi:10.25159/2663-6573/9563

Authors

At Lamprecht North-West University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6573/9563

Keywords:

Unipolar Conceptual Metaphor, Biblical Hebrew, ascend, descend, Cognitive Semantics

Abstract

The cognitive approach to metaphor has faced many challenges: one of these challenges is a lack of more cross-linguistic and cross-cultural research that needs to be done to better understand the claim of the cognitive approach that abstract concepts and abstract reasoning are partly metaphorical. This paper provides evidence that a universal spatial metaphorical system exists (the claim of Cognitive Linguistics) and shows that the theory of conceptual metaphor accommodates the findings to a certain extent. However, this theory of conceptual metaphor does not account for the entire Biblical Hebrew conceptual system and needs to be rethought. This study extends the existing knowledge of conceptual metaphor. Specifically, it expands the knowledge concerning verbs conflating a bipolar conceptual component, that is, MOTION and PATH. This study discusses evidence from the Hebrew Bible, and argues that the Biblical Hebrew verbs (yrd) (descend) and ('lh)(ascend)’s bipolar lexical concepts MOTION DOWN and MOTION UP, respectively, may split into two unipolar lexical concepts MOTION and DOWN and MOTION and UP, respectively, and in which only one unipolar lexical concept, that is DOWN or UP, respectively, is used for metaphorical conceptual mapping.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bergen, B., C. Polley, and K. Wheeler. 2010. “Language and Inner Space.” In Language, Cognition and Space. The State of Art and New Directions, edited by V. Evans and P. Chilton, 79–92. London: Equinox.

Chau, K. 2014. “Metaphor’s Forgotten Brother: A Survey of Metonymy in Biblical Hebrew Poetry.” Journal for Semitics 32 (2): 663–52.

Chau, K. 2015. “Interpreting Biblical Metaphors: Introducing the Invariance Principle.” Vetus Testamentum 65: 377–89. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685330-12301205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685330-12301205

Chun, L. 2002. “A Cognitive Approach to Up/Down Metaphors in English and Shang/Xia Metaphors in Chinese.” In Lexis in Contrast: Corpus-Based Approaches, edited by B. Altenberg and S. Granger, 151–74. Studies in Corpus Linguistics. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.7.11chu DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.7.11chu

Croft, W., and D. A. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864

Cruse, D. A. 2004. Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

De Blois, R. 2000. Toward a New Dictionary of Biblical Hebrew Based on Semantic Domains. New York: United Bible Societies. https://doi.org/10.28977/jbtr.2001.2.8.264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28977/jbtr.2001.2.8.264

Deist, F. E. 2000. The Material Culture of the Bible: An Introduction. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.

Devitt, M., and K. Sterelny. 1987. Language and Reality. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

De Vaux, R. 1961. Ancient Israel: Its Life and Institutions. London: Darton, Longman and Todd.

Dyk, J. W., O. Glanz, and R. Oosting. 2014. “Analysing Valence Patterns in Biblical Hebrew: Theoretical Questions and Analytical Frameworks.” Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 40 (1): 43–62.

Evans, V. 2004. The Structure of Time. Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.12

Evans, V. 2009. How Words Mean. Lexical Concepts, Cognitive Models, and Meaning Construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234660.003.0007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234660.001.0001

Evans, V., B. Bergen, and J. Zinken. 2007. The Cognitive Linguistics Reader. London: Equinox.

Evans, V., and M. Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Fellbaum, C. 2002. “On the Semantics of Troponymy.” In The Semantics of Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, edited by R. Green, C. Bean, and S. Myaeng, 23–34. Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0073-3_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0073-3_2

Fillmore, C. J. 1975. “An Alternative to Checklist Theories of Meaning.” In Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, edited by C Cogen, 123–31. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

Fillmore, C. J. 1977. “Scenes-and-frames Semantics.” In Linguistics Structures Processing edited by A. Zampolli, 55–81. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing.

Fillmore, C. J. 1982. “Frame Semantics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, edited by Linguistic Society of Korea, 111–37. Seoul: Hanshin publishing Company.

Fillmore, C. J. 1985. “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding.” Quaderni di Semantica 6: 222–54.

Glanz, O., R. Oosting, and J. W. Dyk. 2015. “Valence Patterns in Biblical Hebrew: Classical Philology and Linguistic Patterns.” Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 41 (2): 31–55.

Haser, V. 2005. Metaphor, Metonymy, and Experientialist Philosophy: Challenging Cognitive Semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110918243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110918243

Horn, F., and C. Breytenbach, (eds). 2016. Spatial Metaphors: Ancient Texts and Transformations. Berlin Studies of the Ancient World, 39. Berlin: Edition Topoi.

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2002. “Linguistic Typology in Motion Events: Path and Manner.” Anuario del Seminario de Filologia Vasca ‘Julio de Urquijo’. International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology, 1–39.

Jackendoff, R. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jackendoff, R. 1992. Languages of the Mind. Essays on Mental Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4129.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4129.001.0001

Jenni, E., and C. Westermann, (eds). 1997. Theological Lexicon of the Old Testament. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.

Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001

Kamp, A. 2004. Inner Worlds: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach to the Book of Jonah. Biblical Interpretation Series 68. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004494534 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004494534

King, P. 2012. Surrounded by Bitterness. Image Schemas and Metaphors for Conceptualizing Distress in Classical Hebrew. Oregon: Pickwick Publications.

Klingbeil, M. 2010. “Metaphors that Travel and (Almost) Vanish: Mapping Diachronic Changes in the Intertextual Usage of the Heavenly Warrior Metaphor in Psalms 19 and 144.” In Metaphors in the Psalms, edited by P. Van Hecke and A. Labahn, 115–34. Leuwen: Peeters.

Kövecses, Z. 2002. Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kövecses, Z. 2006. Language, Mind and Culture. A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kruger, P. A. 2000. “A Cognitive Interpretation of the Emotion of Anger in the Hebrew Bible.” Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 26: 181–93.

Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001

Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.

Lakoff, G., and Z. Kövecses. 1987. “The Cognitive Model of Anger Inherent in American English.” In Cultural Models in Language and Thought, edited by D. Holland and N. Quinn, 195–221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607660.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607660.009

Lamprecht, A. 2015. “Spatial Cognition and the Death Metaphor in the Hebrew Bible.” PhD diss.,. University of the Free State.

Lamprecht, A. 2021. “The Journey of Jephthah’s Daughter: On Spatial Cognition, Body and Language in Judges 11:37.” HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 77 (1): a6888. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i1.6888 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i1.6888

Lancaster, M. D. 2021. “Metaphor Research and the Hebrew Bible.” Currents in Biblical Research 19 (3): 235–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476993X20987952 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476993X20987952

Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. W. 1990. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Langacker, R. W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 2. Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. W. 1999. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800524 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800524

Leezenberg, M. 2001. Contexts of Metaphor. Oxford: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585473932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585473932

Mithen, S. 1996. The Prehistory of the Mind. London: Thames and Hudson.

Murphy, G. 1996. “On Metaphoric Representation.” Cognition 60: 173–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(96)00711-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(96)00711-1

Oosting, R., and J. Dyk. 2017. “Valence Patterns of Motion Verbs: Syntax, Semantics, and Linguistic Variation.” Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 43 (1): 63–85.

Peleg, Y. 2013. Go You Forth: The Journeys of the Patriarchs in the Biblical Narrative. Tel Aviv: Resling.

Pohlig, J. N. 2003. “Cognition and Biblical Documents: Toward Overcoming Theoretical and Methodological Obstacles to Recovering Cultural Worldviews.” Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 29: 21–35.

Polak, F. 2009. “Verbs in Motion in Biblical Hebrew: Lexical Shifts and Syntactic Structure.” In A Palimpsest: Rhetoric, Ideology, Stylistics, and Language Relating to Persian Israel, edited by E. Ben Zvi, 173–210. Perspectives on Hebrew Scriptures and Contexts 5. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press. https://doi.org/10.31826/9781463216740-010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31826/9781463216740-010

Pourcel, S. 2010. “Motion: a Conceptual Typology.” In Language, Cognition and Space. The State of Art and New Directions, edited by V. Evans and P. Chilton, 419–49. London: Equinox.

Rechenmacher, H. 2004. “Kognitive Linguistik und althebraïsche Lexikographie.” Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 30 (2): 43–59.

Ryken, L., J. C. Wilhoit, and T. and Longman (eds). 1998. Dictionary of Biblical Imagery: An Encyclopedic Exploration of the Images, Symbols, Motifs, Metaphors, Figures of Speech and Literary Patterns of the Bible. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

Sampaio, W., C. Sinha, and V. Sinha. 2006. “Mixing and Mapping: Motion, Path and Manner in Amondawa.” In Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Study of Language. Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, edited by E. Lieven, J. Guo, and S. Özçaliskan, 1–26. Mahwath, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.

Shead, S. L. 2011. Radical Frame Semantics and Biblical Hebrew: Exploring Lexical Semantics. Biblical Interpretation Series 108. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004222182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004222182

Sutskover, T. 2014. “Down, Up, Right, and Left: Directionality and Space in Jonah.” In Discourse, Dialogue, and Debate in the Bible. Essays in Honour of Frank H. Polak, edited by A. Brenner-Idan, 203–17. Hebrew Bible Monographs, 63. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.

Talmy, L. 1985. “Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms.” In Language and Typology and Syntactic Description, edited by T. Shopen, 57–149. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001

Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001

Taylor, J. R. 2002. Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Van der Merwe, C. H. J. 2006. “Lexical Meaning in Biblical Hebrew and Cognitive Semantics: A Case Study.” Biblica 87: 85–95.

Van Hecke, P. 1999. “Are People Walking After or Before God?” Orientalia Lovaniensia Periodica 30: 37–71. https://doi.org/10.2143/OLP.30.0.583575 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2143/OLP.30.0.583575

Van Hecke, P. 2001. “Polysemy or Homonymy in the Root(s) r’h in Biblical Hebrew: A Cognitive-Linguistic Approach.” Zeitschrift für Althebraistik 14: 50–67.

Van Steenbergen, G. J. 2005. Semantics, World View and Bible Translation: An Integrated Analysis of a Selection of Hebrew Lexical Items Referring to Negative Moral Behaviour in the Book of Isaiah. Stellenbosch: SUN. https://doi.org/10.18820/9781920109028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18820/9781920109028

Van Wolde, E. J. 2003. “Wisdom, Who Can Find It? A Non-Cognitive and Cognitive Study of Job 28:1–11.” In Job 28: Cognition in Context, edited by E. J. van Wolde, 1–36. Biblical Interpretation Series 64. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004496781_003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004496781_003

Van Wolde, E. J. 2005. “Cognitive Linguistics and Its Implications to Genesis 28:10-22.” In One Text, a Thousand Methods: Studies in Memory of Sjef Van Tilborg, edited by P. J. E. Chatelion Counet, and U. F. Berges, 125–48. Biblical Interpretation Series 71. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047415428_011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047415428_011

Van Wolde, E. J. 2008. “Sentiments as Culturally Constructed Emotions: Anger and Love in the Hebrew Bible.” Biblical Interpretation 16: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1163/156851508X247602 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156851508X247602

Widder, W. L. 2011. “A Cognitive Linguistic Study of a Biblical Hebrew Lexical Set for ‘To Teach’.” PhD diss., University of the Free State.

Wyatt, N. 2005. The Mythic Mind. Essays on Cosmology and Religion in Ugaritic and Old Testament Literature. London: Equinox.