Research Data Repositories from Latin America: Analysis and Proposal of Library Functions to Implement Open Science

Authors

  • Juan Miguel Palma National Autonomous University of Mexico https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6292-4511
  • Georgina Araceli Torres Vargas National Autonomous University of Mexico

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-659X/15112

Keywords:

Open science, infrastructure, repositories, research data, scholarly libraries, Latin America

Abstract

Globally, the open science movement has as its main principle the openness of publicly funded data and research outputs. It is essential that actors in this movement include the development and implementation of legal, technical and technological infrastructure. The premise of this research was that if the purpose of open science is free access to research products, then technological infrastructure is fundamental to crystallise availability, visibility, reproducibility and unrestricted access. The research aimed to identify actions of the open science movement in Latin America and study technological infrastructure for data repositories developed and implemented there. The methodology comprised a bibliographic review and quantitative methods. For the exploratory analysis, the sources for retrieval of information were official Web portals of library entities, the Registry of Research Data Repositories, and the Dataverse Project. The search was based on defined variables, namely actions, data repository, infrastructure, library collaboration, and repositories in the Registry of Research Data Repositories and Dataverse. Findings were studied through a descriptive content analysis based on defined variables. We found that nine Latin American countries carry out open science actions; eight develop research data repositories; eight implement technological infrastructure to develop repositories; seven collaborate with libraries in open science actions; and seven have their repositories recorded in the Registry of Research Data Repositories and Dataverse, resulting in 62 research data repositories in Latin America. We concluded that these libraries are actors and laboratories with methodological and pragmatic elements that contribute to the organisation, reproducibility, transparency, management and open access that support the paradigm shift which the scholarly communication system requires.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Juan Miguel Palma, National Autonomous University of Mexico

Professor Palma has a PhD in Library and Information Science from the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). He is an Academic Librarian at Humanindex: Academic Information System and a professor in Library and Information Studies (UNAM). His research interests are: scholarly communication; open science; and open access. He has been a national and international speaker at more than 80 academic events, is a member of the Commission of Metadata of Institutional Repository UNAM and has been an evaluator of the Repositories for the National Council of Science and Technology (CONACyT). He is a member of the National System of Researchers of CONACyT in Mexico, serves on the Standing Committee of Serials and Other Continuous Resources Section (SOCRS),  and is a member of the Open Access Working Group (OAGW) to IFLA. He has been involved with WLIC Coaching since 2020, coaching Continuing Professional Development and Workplace Learning to IFLA. He was a Standing Committee Member of the Latin America and Caribbean Section of IFLA, and is a member of the Mexican Librarians Association (AMBAC).

Georgina Araceli Torres Vargas, National Autonomous University of Mexico

Georgina Torres Vargas holds a doctorate in Information Sciences from the Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Spain, where she obtained outstanding cum laude, as well as a bachelor's and master's degree in Librarianship from the Faculty of Philosophy and Letters (UNAM). Her research interests are Resources and digital spaces and information and knowledge technologies. She is a full-time head researcher at the Institute of Research on Library Science and Information (IIBI), National Autonomous University of Mexico, and a Director of IIBI. She belongs to the National System of Researchers of Science and Technology (CONACyT) and is a tutor of postgraduates in Library and Information Studies at UNAM. She has taught courses in Spain, Portugal, and Peru and conducted two research stays: one at the Lusitanian Polytechnic Institute of Porto and another at the UCM

References

Aebischer, Patrick. 2015. “Universities: Increasingly Global Players.” In UNESCO Science Report Towards 2030, 3. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000235440; https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210059053c002

Argentina. 2022. “Diagnóstico y lineamientos para una política de ciencia abierta en Argentina.” https://back.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/2023/01/documento_final_comite_cayc_-_dic_22.pdf

ANID. 2020 “Propuesta de Política de acceso abierto a la información científica y a datos de investigación financiados con fondos públicos de la ANID.” https://s3.amazonaws.com/documentos.anid.cl/estudios/Politica_acceso_a_informacion_cientifica_version_final_26-05-2020.pdf

Ayris, Paul, and Tiberius Ignat. 2018. “Defining the Role of Libraries in the Open Science Landscape: A Reflection on Current European Practice.” Open Information Science 2 (1): 1–22. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opis-2018-0001/html; https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2018-0001

Bartling, Sönke, and Sascha Friesike. 2014. “Towards Another Scientific Revolution.” In Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing, 3–15. Springer Open. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-00026-8

BOAI. 2022 “The Budapest Open Access Initiative: 20th Anniversary Recommendations.” https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai20/

Bowley, C. 2022. “New International Recommendations for Open Access Publishing #BOAI20.” Scielo in Perspective. January 10, 2023, https://blog.scielo.org/en/2022/04/08/new-international-recommendations-for-open-access-publishing-boai20/#.YsOyiXbMK00

Biblioteca Arturo Agüero Chaves. 2021. “Kimuk Repositorio Nacional de Costa Rica.” YouTube. Accessed June 8, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nysQCy9AGsI

Campbell, C. 2021. “Breaking down Barriers and Building an Open Future.” Paper presented at IFLA World Library and Information Congress. Session Power of Transformation: Open Access and Library Collections. Online, 17–19 August.

CNPQ. 2022. “USP e CNPq assinam acordo para continuidade do compartilhamento de dados científicos.” https://www.gov.br/cnpq/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/cnpq-em-acao/usp-e-cnpq-assinam-acordo-para-continuidade-do-compartilhamento-de-dados-cientificos

Colombia. 2022a. “Lineamientos para una política de ciencia abierta en Colombia.” https://minciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/ckeditor_files/Lineamientos%20ciencia%20abierta%2017-dic-2018-doc.pdf

Colombia. 2022b. “Política Nacional de Ciencia Abierta 2022-2031.” https://minciencias.gov.co/pdf/pdfreader?url=https://minciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/politica_nacional_de_ciencia_abierta_-2022_- _version_aprobada.pdf

CONACyT. 2017. “Lineamientos específicos para repositorios.” México: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología. https://www.siicyt.gob.mx/index.php/normatividad/2-conacyt/1-programas-vigentes-normatividad/lineamientos/lineamientos-especificos-para-repositorios/4704-lineamientos-especificos-para-repositorios/file

CONICyT. 2014a. “Propuesta de Política de Datos Abiertos.” Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica. https://datoscientificos.cl/politica

CONICyT. 2014b. “Datos Científicos Abiertos: la Ciencia la hacemos entre todos.” Chile: Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica.

Creative Commons. 2017. “About the Licenses.” https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en

Cross, W. 2016. “Libraries Support Data-sharing Across the Research Lifecycle.” Library Journal, February 1, 2016. https://www.libraryjournal.com/?detailStory=libraries-support-data-sharing-across-the-research-lifecycle

Dataverse Project. 1997. https://dataverse.org/

De Gennaro, R. 1977. “Escalating Journal Prices: Time to Fight Back.” American Libraries 8 (2): 69–74. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25620959

Dempsey, L. 2021. “Library Collection in an Open Access World.” Paper presented at IFLA World Library and Information Congress. Session Power of Transformation: Open Access and Library Collections. Online, 17–19 August.

European Commission. 2017. “H2020 Programme. Guidelines to the Rules on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Open Access to Research Data in Horizon 2020, Version 3.2.” 21 March. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilot-guide_en.pdf

FOSTER taxonomy of Open Science. 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-FOSTER-taxonomy-of-Open-Science-FOSTER-2019_fig1_356955552

Fressoli, M. 2018. “Los desafíos que enfrentan las prácticas de ciencia abierta.” Teknokultura 15 (2): 429–448. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/60616; https://doi.org/10.5209/TEKN.60616

GoFAIR. 2016. “FAIR Principles.” https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/

Gómez, N. D., E. Méndez, and P. T. Hernández. 2016. “Social Sciences and Humanities Research Data and Metadata: A Perspective from Thematic Data Repositories.” El Profesional de la Información 25 (4): 545–555. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.jul.04

Guajardo, M. 2020 “Factores determinantes para la implementación del esquema de metadatos para repositorios de datos de investigación de la Política de Ciencia Abierta en México.” In La revolución de los datos Bibliográficos, Científicos y Culturales, 143–160, Rodríguez, A. (Coord.). UNAM, Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliotecológicas y de la Información.

Howard Hughes Medical Institute. 2003. “Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing.” http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm

IFLA. 2009. “Statement of International Cataloguing Principles.” https://www.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/assets/cataloguing/icp/icp_2009-en.pdf

IFLA. 2022. “10 Years of the IFLA Open Access Statement: A Call to Action.” https://repository.ifla.org/handle/123456789/2029

Karisma Foundation. 2018. “Declaración de Panamá sobre Ciencia Abierta.” https://web.karisma.org.co/DeclaracionDePanama/

Lipscomb, C. E. 2011. “The Library as Laboratory.” Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 89 (1): 79–80. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC31709/

Max Planck Society. 2003. “Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities.” http://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration

McNeill, K. 2016. “Repository Options for Research Data.” In Making Institutional Repositories Work, 15–30. Purdue University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1wf4drg.7

Melero, R., and J. Hernández. 2014. “Acceso abierto a los datos de investigación, una vía hacia la colaboración científica.” Revista Española De Documentación Científica 37 (4): e066. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.4.1154

México. 2022. “Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos.” México: Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión. https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/CPEUM.pdf

Mora, A. 2023. “Estrategia de Ciencia abierta Universidad Nacional.” Andrea Mora Campos, Fabiola Campos Jara, Jorge Herrera Murillo, Viviana Salgado Silva, Gabriela Pino Chacón [y otros 12]. Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica. https://repositorio.una.ac.cr/bitstream/handle/11056/25932/DIAGRAMACIÓN-ESTRATEGIA-CA.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y

Mullen, L. B. 2011. Open Access and Collection Development in Academic Libraries: Digitization to Discovery. Rutgers University. https://scholarship.libraries.rutgers.edu/discovery/fulldisplay/alma991031549855504646/01RUT_INST:ResearchRepository

OMPI. 2016. Principios básicos del derecho de autor y los derechos conexos. Suiza: Organización Mundial de Propiedad Intelectual. http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/es/wipo_pub_909_2016.pdf

Open Society Foundations. 2002. Budapest Open Initiative. https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read/

Pontika, N., P. Knoth, M. Cancellieri, and S. Pearce. 2015. “Fostering Open Science to Research using a Taxonomy and an eLearning Portal,” iKnow: 15th International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data-Driven Business, 21–22 Oct. Austria: Graz. https://doi.org/10.1145/2809563.2809571

PUCP. 2019. “Portal de Datos Abiertos.” https://datos.pucp.edu.pe/

Registry of Research Data Repositories. 2012. “re3data.org.” https://www.re3data.org/

Revez, Jorge. 2018. “Opening the Heart of Science: A Review of the Changing Roles of Research Libraries.” Publications 6 (1): 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications6010009

Science Digital. 2022. Goodey, Gregory, Mark Hahnel, Yuanchun Zhou, Lulu Jiang, Ishwar Chandramouliswaran … et al. “The State of Open Data 2022: Digital Science Report.” https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21276984.v5

SciELO. 2022. “SciELO Data.” https://scielo.org/es/sobre-el-scielo/scielo-data-es/

Smith, K. 2020 Transitioning to the Next Generation of Metadata. OCLC. https://doi.org/10.25333/rqgd-b343

Solano, V. 2021. “Costa Rica fortalece la gestión de datos de investigación, las visiones de acceso abierto y ciencia abierta.” https://www.conare.ac.cr/noticias/282-costa-rica-fortalece-la-gestion-de-datos-de-investigacion-las-visiones-de-acceso-abierto-y-ciencia-abierta

UN. 2015. “Goals 16 Promote Peaceful and Inclusive Societies for Sustainable Development, Provide Access to Justice for all and Build Effective, Accountable and Inclusive Institutions at all Levels ODS 16.10.” https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal16

UN. 2019. “Article 27. Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” https://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/eng.pdf

UNAM. 2015. “Lineamientos para la Integración y Publicación de las Colecciones Universitarias Digitales en el Portal de Datos Abiertos UNAM Colecciones Universitarias.” Gaceta UNAM 4727: 24–28.

UNESCO. 1999. “Declaration on Science and the Use of Scientific Knowledge. Science for the Twenty-First Century: A New Commitment.” http://www.unesco.org/science/wcs/eng/declaration_e.htm

UNESCO. 2021. Recommendation on Open Science. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949?4=null&queryId=5ea03b1a-8267-4a66-a381-53142c2e4737

University of Leicester. 2020. “Research Data Definitions.” https://www2.le.ac.uk/services/research-data/old-2019-12-11/documents/UoL_ReserchDataDefinitions_20120904.pdf

University of Minnesota. 2020. “What is data?” https://www.lib.umn.edu/datamanagement/whatdata#rep

Universidad del Rosario. 2016. “Portal Institucional de Ciencia Abierta.” https://cienciaabierta.urosario.edu.co/?_ga=2.6183541.73949541.1625717635-999329532.1625717635

UNT. 2020. “Collection Development Policy for Open Access and Born-Digital Resources.” https://library.unt.edu/policies/oa-collection-development/

Published

2024-08-21

How to Cite

Palma, Juan Miguel, and Georgina Araceli Torres Vargas. “Research Data Repositories from Latin America: Analysis and Proposal of Library Functions to Implement Open Science”. Mousaion: South African Journal of Information Studies, 24 pages . https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-659X/15112.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2023-10-25
Accepted 2024-06-26
Published 2024-08-21