THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROJECTED IQ FROM QEEG AND NEUROCOGNITIVE ABILITY

Authors

  • Davidzo Mashiri Biofeedback Laboratories

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/1812-6371/1864

Keywords:

Electroencephalogram (EEG), Intelligence Quotient (IQ), neurocognitive performance, projected IQ, global intelligence, nonverbal intelligence

Abstract

Intelligence Quotient (IQ) scores are used as a measure to predict intelligence through a series of tests. Studies show that various methods can be applied in order to acquire ones IQ score. Of key interest, new technology such as the use of an electroencephalograph (EEG) can be used. An EEG is a computerized recording of the electrical activities of the brain, and with one reading it is able to give an assessment of the brain as well as the IQ scores. This is important because it could mean that instead of having people undergo a battery of tests in order to acquire an IQ score, one intervention can be utilized – the EEG. Currently, there is minimal discourse regarding the relationship between an EEG’s projected IQ scores and neurocognitive functionality. Potential for neurocognitive ability can be measured through scores of tests, which are used to determine IQ and these are usually administered by a registered professional. The aim of this paper is to bring to light the ability of the EEG to measure IQ as well as to highlight the benefits of using EEG measurements for IQ rather than the conventional ways of testing. This can be done by collecting QEEG measurements of projected IQ which has three categories namely, global, verbal and nonverbal intelligence and then correlate these scores with scores attained from conventional tests with similar categories. Research that has been previously done confirms this paper’s preliminary hypothesis in finding significant correlations between EEG and intelligence, thus demonstrating predictive ability of EEG to measure neurocognitive performance.

References

Anokhin, A., & Vogel, F. (1996). EEG Alpha Rhythm Frequency and Intelligence in Normal Adults. Intelligence, 23 (1), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(96)80002-X

Demitri, M. (2007). Types of Brain Imaging Techniques. Retrieved April 23, 2013, from PsychCentral: http://psychcentral.com/lib/2007/types-of-brain-imaging-techniques/.

Doppelmayr, M., Klimesch, W., Stadler, W., Pöllhuber, D., & Heine, C. (2002). EEG alpha power and intelligence. Intelligence, 30 (3), 289–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00101-5

Groth-Marnat, G. (1990). Handbook of Psychological Assessment: Second Edition. Canada:

John Wiley & Sons.

Ireland, K. (2010, May 19). The Disadvantages of IQ Test. Retrieved June 14, 2013, from

LiveStrong.com: http://www.livestrong.com/article/127284-disadvantages-iq-tests/.

Klimesch, W. (1999). EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Research Reviews, 29 (2–3), 169 –195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00056-3

Mureriwa, J. F. (2011). Psychology is entirely physical. Pretoria: The South African Biofeedback and Applied Psychophysiology Laboratory.

Polunina, A.G., & Davydov, D.M. (2006). EEG correlates of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. International Journal of Neuroscience, 116 (10), 1231–1248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450600550287

Posthuma, D., Neale, M., Boomsma, D., & de Geus, E. (2001). Are smarter brains running faster? Heritability of alpha peak frequency, IQ, and their interrelation. Behaviour and Genetics, 31 (6), 567–579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013345411774

Taljaard, J. J., & Owen, K. (1996). Handbook of the use of Psychological and Scholastic tests of HSRC. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.

Thatcher, R.W. (2012). Handbook of Quantitative Electroencephalography and EEG Biofeedback. St. Petersburg: Anipublishing Co.

Thatcher, R.W., North, D., & Biver, C. (2005). EEG and Intelligence: Relations between EEG coherence, EEG phase delay and power. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116 (9), 2129–2141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.04.026

van Eeden, R. (1992). Appendix Two to the Manual for the Senior South African Individual Scale - Revised. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.

Wechsler, D. (1990). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence - Revised. London: The Psychological Corporation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t48859-000

White, S.H. (2000). Conceptual foundations of IQ testing. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6 (1), 33–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.6.1.33

Downloads

Published

2016-11-03

How to Cite

Mashiri, Davidzo. 2014. “THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROJECTED IQ FROM QEEG AND NEUROCOGNITIVE ABILITY”. New Voices in Psychology 10 (2):91-100. https://doi.org/10.25159/1812-6371/1864.

Issue

Section

Articles