The sensible and the reasonable : Plato and Rawls
Keywords:
Plato, Rawls, sensibleness, reasonable, rational, liberalism, liberatarianism, communitarianism, democracy, freedom, liberty, Platonic, anti-PlatonismAbstract
The problem of the relationship between the individual and the collective with respect to freedom and within the framework of democracy has been the central subject and issue of some of the liveliest theoretical debates in the last couple of decades. It mostly took the shape of the debate about and around the individualistic, liberal political theory (or theory of freedom, good and justice). However, as this text claims, this renewed interest in the relationship between the individual and the collective and the debate around it seem to remain within the boundaries set by Plato, and therefore it is one of the basic assumptions of this text that the analysis of Plato's political theory is indispensable, highly beneficial and instructive for coming to terms with this debate, as well as with those concerning democratic theory in general. To that effect, this text analyses and compares one of the central concepts of Platonic political theory - the concept of σωφροσύνη (sophrosyne), or sensibleness - with the concept of the reasonable as it has been put forward by the liberal (Rawlsian) political theory in the context of the required and desired consensus upon which a liberal political community should be established. In doing that, we try to show the striking similarities between the two and thus support the claim about the actuality and relevance of Platonic thought for democratic theory.
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Alexander Zistakis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.