You Are (Not) Your Brain: Incompatible Images of Human Beings in The Neurosciences

Pieter Craffert

doi:10.25159/2413-3086/14813

Authors

Pieter Craffert University of South Africa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5673-4770

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2413-3086/14813

Keywords:

neuroscience of consciousness, you are your brain, brain, human being, hylomorphism, Cartesian legacy

Abstract

On an unprecedented scale, contemporary neuroscience confronts us with claims about our essential nature as human beings. These vary from you are your brain to you have no free will. Despite the prevalence of these claims in the neurosciences on the big questions about ourselves, contemporary neuroscience of consciousness does not speak with a unified voice. Although mainstream neuroscience of consciousness claims that you are your brain, a minority tradition argues you are not your brain but that you have a brain. The substance of these two traditions is presented in this article. An evaluation of the impact of the neurosciences on the big questions of being humans should as a first step appreciate the significance that the neurosciences do not automatically provide a solution to these age-old questions about human beings but display a spectrum of views.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Beauregard, James. 2015. “Neuroscientific Free Will: Insights from the Thought of Juan Manuel Burgos and John Macmurray.” Journal of Cognition and Neuroethics 3(1): 13–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.07.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.07.011

Bennett, M. R., and P. M. S. Hacker. 2022. Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Blackmore, S. J. 2005. Consciousness: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192805850.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192805850.001.0001

Choudhury, S., and J. Slaby. 2012. Critical Neuroscience: A Handbook of the Social and Cultural Contexts of Neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell (Kindle edition). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343359

Choudhury, S., I. Gold, and L. J. Kirmayer. 2010. “From Brain Imaging to the Bush Doctrine: Critical Neuroscience and the Politial Uses of Neurotechnology.” American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience 1(2): 17–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507741003699280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21507741003699280

Craffert, P. F. 2014. “Critical Neuroscience as an Interdisciplinary Tool for the Investigation of Neuromatters.” Acta Academica 46(2): 107–125.

Craffert, P. F. 2023. “Your Brain Makes You Do It: A Critical Reflection on the Libetian Denial of Free Will.” Religion and Theology 30(1–2): 124–153. https://doi.org/10.1163/15743012-bja10053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15743012-bja10053

Crick, F. 1994. The Astonishing Hypothesis: The Scientific Search for the Soul. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Dietrich, A. 2007. Introduction to Consciousness: Neuroscientific, Cognitive Science, and Philosophy. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Doyle, S. T. 2021. “Sizing up Free Will: The Scale of Compatibilism.” The Journal of Mind and Behavior 42(3–4): 271–90. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4vxqg DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4vxqg

Eagleman, D. 2015. The Brain: The Story of You. Edinburgh London: Canongate.

Feldman, J. A. 2022. “Computation, Perception, and Mind.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45(e41): 27–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X21000881 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X21001886

Feser, E. 2019. Aristotle’s Revenge: The Metaphysical Foundations of Physical and Biological Science. Neunkirchen-Seelcheid: Editiones Scholasticae.

Feser, E. 2020. “Scientism: America’s State Religion.” The American Mind, 25 August, 1–12. https://americanmind.org/salvo/scientism-americas-state-religion/

Feser, E. 2023. “What is Matter (and Why Does It Matter)?” https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2023/01/86512/.

Frith, C. D., and G. Rees. 2017. “A Brief History of the Scientific Approach to the Study of Consciousness.” In The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness, edited by Susan Schneider and Max Velmans, 3–16. Chichester: John Wiley Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119132363.ch1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119132363.ch1

Fuchs, T. 2018. Ecology of the Brain: The Phenomenology and Biology of the Embodied Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199646883.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199646883.001.0001

Fuchs, T. 2021. In Defense of the Human Being: Foundational Questions of an Embodied Anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192898197.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192898197.001.0001

Fuchs, T. 2022. “The Not-Yet-Conscious: Protentional Consciousness and the Emergence of the New.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. doi.org/10.1007/s11097–022–09869–9 Accessed January 25, 2024. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11097-022-09869-9.

Gabriel, R. 2012. “Modularity in Cognitive Psychology and Affective Neuroscience.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 19(3–4): 19–25.

Gallagher, S. 2017. Enactivist Interventions: Rethinking the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198794325.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198794325.001.0001

Ganeri, J. 2011. “Emergentisms, Ancient and Modern.” Mind 120(479): 671–703. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzr038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzr038

Glannon, W. 2011. Brain, Body, and Mind: Neuroethics with a Human Face. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199734092.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199734092.001.0001

Hobson, J A. 2001. The Dream Drugstore: Chemically Altered States of Consciousness. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2493.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2493.001.0001

Holmes, H. R. 1993. “Thinking About Religion and Experiencing the Brain: Eugene d’Aquili’s Biogenetic Structural Theory of Absolute Unitary Being.” Zygon 28(2): 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1993.tb01027.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1993.tb01027.x

Holvenstot, C. 2010. “A Conceptual Reorientation of Consciousness.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 17(7–8): 191–212.

Jasanoff, A. 2018. The Biological Mind: How Brain, Body, and Environment Collaborate to Make Us Who We Are. New York: Basic Books.

Jeeves, M., and W. S. Brown. 2009. Neuroscience, Psychology, And Religion: Illusions, Delusions, and Realities About Human Nature. West Conshohocken (PA): Templeton Foundation Press.

Kitchener, P. D., and C. G. Hales. 2022. “What Neuroscientists Think, and Don’t Think, About Consciousness.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 16: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.767612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.767612

Metzinger, T. 2000. “Introduction: Consciousness Research at the End of the Twentieth Century.” In Neural Correlates of Consciousness: Empirical and Conceptual Questions, edited by Thomas Metzinger, 1–12. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4928.003.0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4928.001.0001

Murphy, N., and W. S. Brown. 2007. Did My Neurons Make Me Do It? Philosophical and Neurobiological Perspectives on Moral Responsibility and Free Will. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199215393.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199215393.001.0001

Noë, A. 2009. Out of Our Heads: Why You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons from the Biology of Consciousness. New York: Hill and Wang.

Olivier, B. 2017. “Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Being Human: What is the Difference?” Acta Academica 49(1): 2–21. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-a2ade9047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18820/24150479/aa49i1.1

Owen, M., and M. P Guta. 2019. “Physically Sufficient Neural Mechanisms of Consciousness.” Front. Syst. Neurosci. 13(24): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00024

Pyysiäinen, I. 2009. Supernatural Agents: Why We Believe in Souls, Gods, and Buddhas. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380026.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380026.001.0001

Rose, N., and J. M. Abi-Rached. 2013. Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind. Princeton Oxford: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691149608.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691149608.001.0001

Saniotis, A., and M. Henneberg. 2011. “An Evolutionary Approach Toward Exploring Altered States of Consciousness, Mind–Body Techniques, and Non-Local Mind.” World Futures: The Journal of New Paradigm Research 67: 182–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2011.555250 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2011.555250

Schmitz, S., and G. Höppner. 2014. “Neurofeminism and Feminist Neurosciences: A Critical Review of Contemporary Brain Research.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00546

Searle, J. R. 2000. “Consciousness.” Annual Review of Neuroscience 23: 557–78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.557

Slaby, J., and S. Gallagher. 2015. “Critical Neuroscience and Socially Extended Minds.” Theory, Culture and Society 32(1): 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414551996 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414551996

Slaby, J., and J-C. Heilinger. 2013. “Lost in Phenospace: Questioning the Claims of Popular Neurophilosophy. Metodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy 1(2): 83–100. https://doi.org/10.19079/metodo.1.2.83 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19079/metodo.1.2.83

Swaab, D. F. 2014. We Are Our Brains: From the Womb to Alzheimer’s. London: Penguin.

Trujillo, A. K., E. N. Kesse, O. Rollins, S. DellaSala, and R. Cubelli. 2022. “A Discussion on the Notion of Race in Cognitive Neuroscience Research.” Cortex 150: 153–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.11.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.11.007

Varela, F. J., E. Thompson, and E. Rosch. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Massachusetts: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001

Vidal, F. 2009. “Brainhood, Anthropological Figure of Modernity.” History of Human Sciences 22(1): 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695108099133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695108099133

Vidal, F., and F. Ortega. 2012. “Are There Neural Correlates of Depression?” In Critical Neuroscience: A Handbook of the Social and Cultural Contexts of Neuroscience, edited by S. Choudhury and J. Slaby, 345–366. Oxford: Blackwell (Kindle edition). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343359.ch17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343359.ch17

Vidal, F., and F. Ortega. 2017. Being Brains: Making the Cerebral Subject. New York: Fordham University Press (Kindle edition). https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823276073.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823276073.001.0001