Institutional Isomorphism and Adoption of Activity-Based Costing in Tanzanian Manufacturing Sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/1998-8125/14132Keywords:
Institutional Isomorphism, Innovation Adoption, Activity-based Costing (ABC), Implementation Levels, Manufacturing SectorAbstract
This study aimed to ascertain the correlation between the three forces of institutional isomorphism and the adoption of different levels of activity-based costing (ABC) by manufacturing companies in Tanzania. A cross-sectional survey design was executed to collect the primary data from the three research areas: Dar es Salaam, Arusha, and Dodoma regions. The study employed the multinomial logistic regression model (MLRM) to analyse the quantitative data from a sample of 188 manufacturing companies. The analytical results show that only normative pressures positively correlated with level 2 of ABC adoption, while mimetic and coercive pressures positively correlated with level 3. Level 4 of ABC adoption positively correlated with mimetic pressures, while level 5 was found to correlate with coercive pressures only positively.
Metrics
References
Acquah, I., D. Essel, C. Baah, Y. Agyabeng-Mensah, and E. Afum. 2021. “Investigating the Efficacy of Isomorphic Pressures on the Adoption of Green Manufacturing Practices and Its Influence on Organizational Legitimacy and Financial Performance.” Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 32 (7): 1399–1420. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-10-2020-0404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-10-2020-0404
Aillon, H., W. Rocha, and K. Marques. 2018. “Deinstitutionalization of Activity Based Costing: Analysis from the New Institutional Sociology Perspective.” Belo Horizonte 29 (1): 101–129. https://doi.org/10.22561/cvr.v29i1.3934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22561/cvr.v29i1.3934
Alcouffe, S., J. Maurice, N. Galy, and L. Gate. 2019. “Is the Limited Diffusion of Management Accounting Innovations Really a Paradox? A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Product Diversity and the Adoption of Activity-Based Costing.” Compatibilite-Controlle-Audit 25 (1). https://doi.org/10.3917/cca.251.0133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/cca.251.0133
Amoako, G., A. Adam, G. Tackie, and C. Arthur. 2021. “Environmental Accountability Practices of Environmentally Sensitive Firms in Ghana: Does Institutional Isomorphism Matter?” Sustainability 13 (17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179489
Anafinova, S. 2020. “The Role of Rankings in Higher Education Policy: Coercive and Normative Isomorphism in Kazakhstani Higher Education.” International Journal of Educational Development 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102246
Askarany, D., J. Brierley, and H. Yazdifar. 2012. “The Effect of Innovation Characteristics on Activity-Based Costing Adoption.” Int. J. Managerial and Financial Accounting 4 (3): 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMFA.2012.047854 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMFA.2012.047854
D’Andreamatteo, A., L. Ianni, A. Rangone, F. Paolone, and M. Sargiacomo. 2019. “Institutional Pressures, Isomorphic Changes and Key Agents in the Transfer of Knowledge of Lean in Healthcare.” Business Process Management Journal 25 (1): 164–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2017-0174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2017-0174
DiMaggio, P., and W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48: 147–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1962.tb01288.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Fagerland, M., and D. Hosmer. 2017. “How to Test for Goodness of Fit in Ordinal Logistic Regression Models.” The Stata Journal 17 (3): 668–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1701700308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1701700308
Fito, M., J. Llobet, and N. Guguero. 2018. “The Activity-Based Costing Model Trajectory: A Path of Lights and Shadows.” Intangible Capital 14 (1): 146–161. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.1107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.1107
Gisario, A., M. Kazarian, F. Martina, and M. Mahrpouya. 2019. “Metal Additive Manufacturing in the Commercial Aviation Industry: A Review.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 53: 124–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.08.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.08.005
Hansen, D., M. Mowen, and D. Heitger. 2022. “Cost Management (5th Ed)”. Cengage, USA.
Hutaibat, K., and Z. Alhatabat. 2020. “Management Accounting Practices’ Adoption in UK Universities.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 44 (8). https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1643457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1643457
Kezar, A., and S. Bernstein-Sierra. 2019. “Examining Processes of Normative Isomorphism and Influence in Scaled Change Among Higher Education Intermediary Organizations.” AERA Open 5 (4): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419884905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419884905
Maier, C., J. Thatcher, V. Grover, and Y. Dwivedi. 2023. “Cross-sectional Research: A Critical Perspective, Use Cases, and Recommendations for IS Research.” International Journal of Information Management 70: 102625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102625 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102625
Martínez-Ferrero, J., and I. García-Sánchez. 2016. “Coercive, Normative and Mimetic Isomorphism as Determinants of the Voluntary Assurance of Sustainability Reports.” International Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.05.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.05.009
Molela, G., P. Kasoga, and I. Ismail. 2023. “Activity-Based Costing Adoption Rates in Manufacturing and Service Sectors in Tanzania: A Comparative Study Using Chi-Square Test Model”. Int. J. of Managerial and Financial Accounting (Under Review)
Mustapha, M., F. Hasan, and M. Muda. 2017. “Isomorphic Factors for the Adoption of Lean Six Sigma in Malaysia.” Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 12 (24): 7633–7639.
Nattino, G., M. Pennell, and S. Lemeshow. 2020. “Assessing the Goodness of Fit of Logistic Regression Models in Large Samples: A Modification of the Hosmer-Lemeshow Test.” Biometrics 76 (2): 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13249
Nurdin, N., R. Stockdale, and H. Scheepers. 2012. “The Influence of External Institutional Pressures on Local E-Government Adoption and Implementation: A Coercive Perspective within an Indonesian Local E-Government Context.” International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP): 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33489-4_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33489-4_2
Poll, H. 2022. “The Barriers and Drivers of Environmental Management Accounting Practices’ Adoption in Developed and Developing Countries for Sustainable Development.” Sustainable Development 30 (5): 1222–1234. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2312
Sharma, S., and E. Daniel. 2016. “Antecedent Factors of Isomorphism: ERP Adoption by Indian Medium-sized Firms.” Journal of Enterprise Information Management 29 (6): 798–821. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-07-2014-0076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-07-2014-0076
Taherdoost, H., and A. Brard. 2019. “Analyzing the Process of Supplier Selection Criteria and Methods.” Procedia Manufacturing 32: 1024–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.317
Tam, N., and L. Tuan. 2020. “Factors Influencing Adoption of Activity-Based Costing in Developing Countries.” Management Science Letters 10 (14): 3331–3338. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.6.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.6.004
Tukamuhabwa, B., H. Mutebi, and B. Ojok. 2023. “Supply Chain Performance in the Wooden Furniture Industry: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and Supply Chain Intergration in a Developing Country Context.” Journal of African Business. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2023.2215572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2023.2215572
Xu, N., X. Fan, and R. Hu. 2022. “Adoption of Green Industrial Internet of Things to Improve Organizational Performance. The Role of Institutional Isomorphism and Green Innovation Practices.” Frontiers in Psychology 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.917533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.917533
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Godfrey Molela, Pendo Kasoga, Ismail Ismail
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2023-11-27
Published 2023-11-30