Pre-Digital Inertial Forces in a Digital HRM Transformation: A Case Study of a South African Government Organisation

Rennie Naidoo; Sifiso Wiseman Ndlovu

doi:10.25159/1998-8125/18742

Authors

Rennie Naidoo University of the Witwatersrand https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8392-1136
Sifiso Wiseman Ndlovu University of the Witwatersrand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/1998-8125/18742

Keywords:

digital HRM, digital transformation, organisational inertia, public sector, interpretive case study, technology adoption

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines how pre-digital inertial forces constrain the transformation of digital human resource management (HRM) in a South African government organisation. It explores the persistence of legacy paper-based routines and their interaction with digital systems, highlighting why digitalisation often fails to achieve its full potential in the public sector.
Design/methodology/approach: An interpretive case study was conducted, utilising 30 semi-structured interviews with senior, middle, and operational staff. Thematic analysis, guided by Besson and Rowe’s (2012) multidimensional framework, identified eight categories of inertia.
Findings: Despite the widespread acceptance of digital HRM technologies and recognition of their benefits, entrenched pre-digital practices continue to coexist with the system. Eight inertial forces (cognitive, behavioural, psychological, affective, socio-cognitive, socio-technical, economic, and political) limited integration and sustained reliance on paper-based processes.
Research limitations/implications: The findings are specific to one public sector organisation. Future studies could investigate inertial forces in other sectors or track how they evolve with advances in automation and AI-enabled HRM.
Practical implications: Reducing inertia requires reconfiguring the relationship between legacy and digital practices, strengthening system integration, clarifying human resources policies, and building trust through training and change management.
Originality/value: This study applies a multidimensional inertia framework to digital HRM for the first time. It extends information systems and HRM scholarship by demonstrating how entrenched pre-digital practices and bureaucratic routines constrain digital transformation and by offering new insights into the specific challenges of digital reform in the public sector.

References

Adner, R., P. Puranam, and F. Zhu. 2019. “What Is Different about Digital Strategy? From Quantitative to Qualitative Change.” Strategy Science 4 (4): 253–61. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2019.0099.

Alshibly, H. H. 2014. “Evaluating E-HRM Success: A Validation of the Information Systems Success Model.” International Journal of Human Resource Studies 4 (3): 107–18. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v4i3.5929.

Ashford, S. J., B. B. Caza, and E. M. Reid. 2018. “From Surviving to Thriving in the Gig Economy: A Research Agenda for Individuals in the New World of Work.” Research in Organizational Behavior 38: 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.001.

Berente, N., K. Lyytinen, Y. Yoo, and C. Maurer. 2019. “Institutional Logics and Pluralistic Responses to Enterprise System Implementation: A Qualitative Meta-Analysis.” MIS Quarterly 43 (3): 873–902. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/14214.

Besson, P., and F. Rowe. 2012. “Strategizing Information Systems-Enabled Organizational Transformation: A Transdisciplinary Review and New Directions.” Journal of Strategic Information Systems 21 (2): 103–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2012.05.001.

Bhattacherjee, A. 2001. “Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model.” MIS Quarterly 25 (3): 351–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921.

Bhattacherjee, A., and C.-P. Lin. 2015. “A Unified Model of IT Continuance: Three Complementary Perspectives and Crossover Effects.” European Journal of Information Systems 24 (4): 364–73. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.36.

Bohn, S., A. A. Gümüsay, G. Von Richthofen, and G. Reischauer. 2023. “Digital Organising.” Internet Policy Review 12 (4): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.4.1726.

Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Crabtree, B. F., and W. L. Miller, eds. 1992. “A Template Approach to Text Analysis: Developing and Using Codebooks.” In Doing Qualitative Research. SAGE.

De Vries, H., L. Tummers, and V. Bekkers. 2018. “The Diffusion and Adoption of Public Sector Innovations: A Meta-Synthesis of the Literature.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 1 (3): 159–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvy001.

Deloitte. 2020. 2020 Deloitte Global Human Capital Trends. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/human-capital-trends.html.

Deloitte. 2023. Human Capital and Productivity: How Organisations Can Move Beyond Efficiency to Create Real Value. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/talent/human-capital-trends/2023/human-capital-and-productivity.html.

DeLone, W. H., and E. R. McLean. 1992. “Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable.” Information Systems Research 3 (1): 60–95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60.

Enaifoghe, A., N. C. Ndebele, A. Durokifa, and X. Thusi. 2024. “Drivers of Digital Transformation and Their Efficacy in Public Sector Human Resource Management.” In Digital Transformation in Public Sector Human Resource Management, edited by E. Shava and N. Ndebele. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2889-7.ch003.

Erdoğmuş, N., and M. Esen. 2011. “An Investigation of the Effects of Technology Readiness on Technology Acceptance in E-HRM.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 24: 487–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.131.

Gartner. 2025. Gartner Digital Execution Scorecard™ – Achieve Your Digital Priorities. https://www.gartner.com/en/chief-information-officer/research/digital-execution-scorecard.

Gegenhuber, T., D. Logue, C. R. Hinings, and M. Barrett, eds. 2022. “Institutional Perspectives on Digital Transformation.” In Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 83. Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000083001.

Haag, S., F. Born, S. Kreuzer, and S. Bernius. 2013. “Organizational Resistance to E-Invoicing: Results from an Empirical Investigation among SMEs.” In Electronic Government, edited by M. A. Wimmer, M. Janssen, and H. J. Scholl. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40358-3_24.

Hanelt, A., R. Bohnsack, D. Marz, and C. Antunes Marante. 2021. “A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digital Transformation: Insights and Implications for Strategy and Organizational Change.” Journal of Management Studies 58 (5): 1159–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639.

Hinings, B., T. Gegenhuber, and R. Greenwood. 2018. “Digital Innovation and Transformation: An Institutional Perspective.” Information and Organization 28 (1): 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004.

Hong, S., S. H. Kim, and M. Kwon. 2022. “Determinants of Digital Innovation in the Public Sector.” Government Information Quarterly 39 (4): 101723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101723.

Kempeneer, S., and F. Heylen. 2023. “Virtual State, Where Are You? A Literature Review, Framework and Agenda for Failed Digital Transformation.” Big Data & Society 10 (1): 20539517231160528. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231160528.

Klein, H. K., and M. D. Myers. 1999. “A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems.” MIS Quarterly 23 (1): 67–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/249410.

McKinsey & Company. 2023. Generative AI and the Future of HR. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/generative-ai-and-the-future-of-hr.

Mikalef, P., R. van de Wetering, and J. Krogstie. 2021. “Building Dynamic Capabilities by Leveraging Big Data Analytics: The Role of Organizational Inertia.” Information & Management 58 (6): 103412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103412.

Neumann, O., K. Guirguis, and R. Steiner. 2024. “Exploring Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Public Organizations: A Comparative Case Study.” Public Management Review 26 (1): 114–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2048685.

Orlikowski, W. J., and S. V. Scott. 2023. “The Digital Undertow and Institutional Displacement: A Sociomaterial Approach.” Organization Theory 4 (2): 26317877231180898. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877231180898.

Polites, G. L., and E. Karahanna. 2012. “Shackled to the Status Quo: The Inhibiting Effects of Incumbent System Habit, Switching Costs, and Inertia on New System Acceptance.” MIS Quarterly 36 (1): 21–42. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2012/36.1.02.

Ruël, H., and H. van der Kaap. 2012. “E-HRM Usage and Value Creation: Does a Facilitating Context Matter?” German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung 26 (3): 260–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/239700221202600304.

Rumelt, R. 1995. “Inertia and Transformation.” In Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Enterprise, edited by C. A. Montgomery. Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2201-0_5.

Kaganer, E., R. W. Gregory, and S. Sarker. 2023. “A Process for Managing Digital Transformation: An Organizational Inertia Perspective.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 24 (4): 1005–30. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00819.

Seyitoğlu, F., and S. Ivanov. 2024. “Robots and Emotional Intelligence: A Thematic Analysis.” Technology in Society 77: 102512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102512.

Strohmeier, S. 2020. “Digital Human Resource Management: A Conceptual Clarification.” German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung 34 (3): 345–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002220921131.

Sull, D. N. 1999. “Why Good Companies Go Bad.” Harvard Business Review 77 (4): 42–52.

Turner, M., B. Kitchenham, P. Brereton, S. Charters, and D. Budgen. 2010. “Does the Technology Acceptance Model Predict Actual Use? A Systematic Literature Review.” Information and Software Technology 52 (5): 463–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.005.

Van Zyl, W. R., S. Henning, and J. A. van der Poll. 2022. “A Framework for Knowledge Management System Adoption in Small and Medium Enterprises.” Computers 11 (9): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers11090128.

Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2003. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly 27 (3): 425–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.

Wirtky, T., S. Laumer, A. Eckhardt, and T. Weitzel. 2016. “On the Untapped Value of E-HRM: A Literature Review.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems 38: 20–83. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03802.

Yusliza, M., and T. Ramayah. 2012. “Determinants of Attitude towards E-HRM: An Empirical Study among HR Professionals.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 57: 312–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1191.

Zhang, J., and Z. Chen. 2024. “Exploring Human Resource Management Digital Transformation in the Digital Age.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 15 (1): 1482–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01214-y.