Annual Financial Reporting: A Quantitative Analysis of the Temporal Going Concern Status during Business Rescue Proceedings

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/1998-8125/6714

Keywords:

Business rescue, Chapter 6, Financial distress, financial reporting, going concern, liquidation, solvency

Abstract

Purpose: Financial reporting guidance such as the Conceptual Framework for the Presentation of Financial statements (CF), together with specific International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) such as International Accounting Standards no. 1 (IAS 1), require an assessment of whether a company can be considered a going concern at the time of preparing its annual financial statements. According to the Companies Act, no. 71 of 2008 (Companies Act), a company in financial distress may file for temporary business rescue protection in order to reorganise its affairs to continue to exist on a solvent basis (return to solvency [RTS]) or, if that is not possible, to offer a better settlement to creditors or shareholders, than under immediate liquidation (better settlement than under immediate liquidation [BSIL]). Building on prior qualitative research in this area, this paper quantitatively investigates the temporal going concern status in the context of a South African company listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) while under business rescue.

Design: The paper follows a quantitative cross-sectional design using a purposive nonprobability sampling method. Empirical data were collected from accounting and business rescue experts using a structured self-administered questionnaire. The data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics to detect patterns of association between variables of interest.

Findings: The paper presents quantitative empirical evidence supporting prior qualitative research on business rescue context-specific indicators of going concern. In particular, if a South African listed company files for business rescue protection, the company may not be regarded as a going concern, for annual financial reporting purposes, up to the adoption or rejection of a business rescue plan. Furthermore, the evidence shows that when a business rescue plan is adopted that aims to offer a BSIL, the company cannot be considered to be a going concern during the business rescue proceedings. Moreover, should a business rescue practitioner aim for an RTS, the evidence shows that the company can only be likely regarded as a going concern when the business rescue plan is substantially implemented.

Value: Management and auditors should note that in the case of a BSIL, the evidence presented implies an underlying assumption other than the going concern assumption. This is also implied in the case of an RTS aim prior to the substantial implementation of the business rescue plan. In the absence of any other defined underlying assumption, the liquidation basis is the de facto alternative. Moreover, the underlying assumption in an RTS will also likewise be the liquidation basis in the absence of another defined underlying assumption. Standard-setters should take note of the need to provide more guidance on the matter.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Christiaan Lamprecht, Stellenbosch University

Senior Lecturer

School of Accountancy

Hendrik Andreas van Wyk, University of the Free State

Professor

School of Accountancy

References

ASL. 2018. Directors Trading in Insolvent Circumstances. https://www.asl.co.za/directors-trading-in-insolvent-circumstances/.

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2015. “AU-C section 570: The Auditor’s Consideration of an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.” http://www.aicpa.org/Research/Standards/AuditAttest/DownloadableDocuments/AU-C-00570.pdf.

Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD) and Australian Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB). 2009. “Going Concern Issues in Financial Reporting: A Guide for Companies and Directors.” http://www.auasb.gov.au/admin/file/content102/c3/Going_Concern_Issues_in_Financial_Reporting.pdf.

Braatvedt, K. 2018. “The Solvency and Liquidity Test in Business Rescue.” TMA-SA Business Rescue Articles. 2018. https://www.tma-sa.com/info-centre/item/225-the-solvency-and-liquidity-test-in-business-rescue.html.

Bradstreet, R. S. 2011. “The New Business Rescue: Will Creditors Sink or Swim?” South African Law Journal 128 (2): 352–380.

Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC). 2015. “Guidance Note: Application of Section 22 Companies Act 71 of 2008 on Close Corporations.” http://www.cipc.co.za/files/7914/3703/3881/Guidance_note_Application_of_Section_22_Companies_Act_71_of_2008_on_Close_Corporations_June_2015.pdf.

Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC). 2022. “Solvency and Reckless Trading.” http://www.cipc.co.za/index.php/manage-your-business/manage-your-company/private-company/compliance-obligations/solvency-and-reckless-trading/.

Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Design, 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Deegan, C. M. 2014. Financial Accounting Theory, 4th edition. New South Wales: Mc Graw Hill.

Deutskens, E., K. de Ruyter, M. Wetzels, and P. Oosterveld. 2004. “Response Rate and Response Quality of Internet-Based Surveys: An Experimental Study.” Marketing Letters 15 (2): 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MARK.0000021968.86465.00. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MARK.0000021968.86465.00

Erasmus, J. 2014. “Analysis: When Is a Company Financially Distressed?” Accountancy SA. September. https://www.accountancysa.org.za/analysis-when-is-a-company-financially-distressed/.

Financial Reporting Council (FRC). 2012. “The Sharman Inquiry: Going Concern and Liquidity Risks: Lessons for Companies and Auditors. Final Report and Recommendations of the Panel of Inquiry.” https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/4a7f9880-0158-4cf0-b41e-b9e1bf006bd7/Sharman-Inquiry-final-report-FINAL.pdf.

Fremgen, J. T. 1968. “The Going Concern Assumption: A Critical Appraisal.” The Accounting Review 43 (4): 649–656. http://www.jstor.org/stable/243624.

Hahn, W. 2011. “The Going-Concern Assumption: Its Journey into GAAP.” CPA Journal 81 (2): 26–31. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=59756814&site=ehost-live.

Harvey, N. 2011. Turnaround Management and Corporate Renewal: A South African Perspective. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.

Hendriksen, E. S., and M. F. van Breda. 1992. Accounting Theory, 5th edition. Illinois: Irwin.

Hofstee, E. 2006. Constructing a Good Dissertation: A Practical Guide to Finishing a Master’s, MBA or PhD on Schedule. Johannesburg: EPE.

Hoque, Z. 2006. Methodological Issues in Accounting Research: Theories, Methods and Issues. London, UK: Spiramus Press.

Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors (IRBA). 2010. “SAAPS 3 (Revised 2010) Illustrative Reports.” 2010. http://irba.co.za/index.php/auditing-standards-functions-55/181?task=view.

International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). 2021a. “Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting.” In The Annotated IFRS® Standards Part A1. London, UK: IFRS Foundation.

International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). 2021b. “IAS 1: Presentation of Financial Statements.” In The Annotated IFRS® Standards Part A2. London, UK: IFRS Foundation.

International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). 2021c. “Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting: Basis for Conclusions.” In The Annotated IFRS® Standards Part C1. London, UK: IFRS Foundation.

International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC). 1990. “Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements.” In International Accounting Standards, 1990 ed. London: International Accounting Standards Committee.

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2018. “ISA 570: Going Concern.” In Handbook of International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements. Vol. 1. New York: International Federation of Accountants.

Klokow, C. 2019. “Business Rescue Proceedings Status Report, December 2018.” Pretoria: Companies and Intellectual Property Commission.

Kwak, S. G., and J. H. Kim. 2017. “Central Limit Theorem: The Cornerstone of Modern Statistics.” Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 70: 144–156. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.2.144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.2.144

Lamprecht, C., and H. A. van Wyk. 2020. “Context-specific Indicators to Guide the Judgement of a Going Concern for a Company in Business Rescue.” Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences 13 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/jef.v13i1.483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jef.v13i1.483

Loubser, A. 2015. “Verbal Communication with ‘Blinded for Review’ 5 March.” Johannesburg.

Republic of South Africa (RSA). 2008. Companies Act, No 71 of 2008. Pretoria: Government Printer.

Riahi-Belkaoui, A. 2004. Accounting Theory, 5th edition. Singapore: Cengage Learning EMEA.

Ryan, B., R. W. Scapens, and M. Theobald. 2002. Research Method and Methodology in Finance and Accounting, 2nd edition. London, UK: Thomson.

Salmonson, R. F. 1969. Basic Financial Accounting Theory. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Sax, L. J., S. K. Gilmartin, and A. N. Bryant. 2003. “Assessing Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys.” Research in Higher Education 44 (4): 409–432. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024232915870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024232915870

Smits, A. J. 1999. “‘Corporate Administration’: A Proposed Model.” De Jure 32 (1): 80–107.

South African Institute of Chartered Accountants (SAICA). 1999. “Trading whilst Factually Insolvent.” https://saicawebprstorage.blob.core.windows.net/uploads/resources/Guide_on_Trading_Whilst_Factually_Insolvent.pdf.

Sue, V. M., and L. A. Ritter. 2012. Conducting Online Surveys. California: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335186

Sterling, R. R. 1968. “The Going Concern: An Examination.” The Accounting Review 43 (3): 481–502.

Venuti, E. 2004. “The Going-Concern Assumption Revisited: Assessing a Company’s Future Viability.” CPA Journal 74 (5): 40–43.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-01

How to Cite

Lamprecht, Christiaan, and Hendrik Andreas van Wyk. 2022. “Annual Financial Reporting: A Quantitative Analysis of the Temporal Going Concern Status During Business Rescue Proceedings”. Southern African Business Review 26:31 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/1998-8125/6714.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2019-08-19
Accepted 2022-06-09
Published 2022-08-01