Modernity, Money, and Power: Chieftaincy Succession Contestations in Vhavenḓa Culture as Portrayed in Selected Tshivenḓa Texts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6697/21111Keywords:
Vhavenḓa, chieftaincy, successor, contestations, culture, throneAbstract
This article critically examines how modern socio-economic ambitions and lifestyle expectations intensify succession battles in Vhavenḓa chieftaincy, as portrayed in selected Tshivenḓa literary texts. Drawing on postcolonial theory and cultural studies, the study explores how colonial legacies, democratic legal frameworks, and shifting cultural values reshape the normative criteria for identifying successors in contemporary Vhavenḓa society. A qualitative research approach, employing a case study design, is adopted. Textual analysis of Maumela’s novel Vhuhosi vhu tou bebelwa and Mathivha’s drama Mabalanganye constitutes the primary method of data generation and interpretation. The findings reveal that chieftaincy is increasingly constructed as a pathway to wealth, salaried status, social prestige, and control over communal resources, which in turn fuels manipulation, corruption, intra-family conflict, and even lethal violence. The texts further dramatise the tension between customary succession laws and modern constitutional and religious norms, exposing how different actors strategically mobilise these competing frameworks to legitimise their claims to the throne. The article argues that modernity does not simply erode Vhavenḓa chieftaincy but transforms it into a contested site where cultural authority, economic power, and legal recognition intersect. It concludes by recommending clearer documentation and consistent enforcement of customary succession procedures, strengthened oversight by traditional and statutory bodies, and ongoing educational initiatives within royal families to reduce succession-related disputes.
References
Agyeman, L. O., J. K. Owusu Ansah, and M. Ayeltige. 2022. “Development Implications of Chieftaincy Conflicts in Bawku Traditional Area, Ghana.” International Journal of Sustainable Development Research 8 (2): 92–98. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsdr.20220802.18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsdr.20220802.18
Bhabha, H. K. 1994. The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge.
Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
De Beer, F. C. 2004. “Succession to Traditional Venda Leadership in a Changing Constitutional Environment in South Africa.” Anthropology Southern Africa 27 (3–4): 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/23323256.2004.11499905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23323256.2004.11499905
Eagleton, T. 2011. How to Read Literature. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Gabora, L. 2008. “The Cultural Evolution of Socially Situated Cognition.” Cognitive Systems Research 9 (1–2): 104–113. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0803.2568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.05.004
Hall, M. 1987. The Changing Past: Farmers, Kings and Traders in Southern Africa, 200–1860. Cape Town: D. Philip.
Hall, S., ed. 1997. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Hamilton, C., B. K. Mbenga, and R. Ross, eds. 2020. The Cambridge History of South Africa. Volume 1: From Early Times to 1885. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Igboin, B. O. 2016. “Traditional Leadership and Corruption in Pre Colonial Africa: How the Past Affects the Present.” Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae 42 (3): 142–160. https://doi.org/10.25159/2412-4265/228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25159/2412-4265/228
Lechler, M., and L. McNamee. 2020. “Indirect Colonial Rule Undermines Support for Democracy: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Namibia.” Munich Reprints in Economics 62825, University of Munich, Department of Economics. https://ideas.repec.org/p/lmu/muenar/62825.html.
Ḽigege-Tshivhase, V. P. N., interviewed by Phalaphala FM. 2021. “Vhavenda Heritage Documentary.” YouTube video, 2:01:21, November 1, uploaded by Phalaphala FM. Accessed November 18, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEFzzqQgS5s.
Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Mathivha, M. E. R. 2010. Mabalanganye. Johannesburg: Educum.
Matsiliza, N. S. 2024. “The Strategic Role of Traditional Leadership in Promoting Good Governance.” Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review 12 (1): a825. https://doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v12i1.825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v12i1.825
Maumela, T. N. 2004. Vhuhosi vhu tou bebelwa. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
Maunatlala, K. 2023. “Effects of the Eradication of the Rule of Male Primogeniture on the Customary Law of Succession.” De Jure Law Journal 56: 386–404. https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2023/v56a24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2023/v56a24
Mphaphuli, G. M., interviewed on Flava Avenue Podcast. 2024. “FLAVA Avenue Podcast Meets His Majesty Thovhele Gole Mphaphuli.” YouTube video, 1:16:02, uploaded by Flava Avenue Podcast. February 23. Accessed November 18, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tO-vsqy0Rk&t=1191s.
Mphephu, D. J., interviewed by Phalaphala FM. 2021. “Vhavenda Heritage Documentary.” YouTube video, 2:01:21, November 1, uploaded by Phalaphala FM. Accessed May 18, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEFzzqQgS5s&t=6875s.
Mulaudzi, L., and L. Kriel. 2021. “Gendered Ruptures and Continuities in the Venda Traditional Leadership from c. 1990 to 2020.” Southern Journal for Contemporary History 46 (2): 89–112. https://doi.org/10.38140/sjch.v46i2.4844. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38140/sjch.v46i2.4844
Mvenene, J. 2023. “The Waning Fortunes of Traditional Leadership in South Africa: From Pre-Colonial to Apartheid Periods.” New Contree 90: a248. https://doi.org/10.4102/nc.v90.248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/nc.v90i0.248
Ṋetshisaulu, N. C., interviewed by Phalaphala FM. 2021. “Vhavenda Heritage Documentary.” YouTube video, 2:01:21, November 1, uploaded by Phalaphala FM. Accessed November 18, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEFzzqQgS5s&t=6875s.
Nkeneh, Y. C. 2023. “Problematizing Chieftaincy Succession Squabbles in the Cameroon Grassfields Studies.” International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS) 7 (6): 1127–1139. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.7696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.7696
Nsotaka, F. S., M. C. Lilechi, and S. A. Nyanchoga. 2023. “Legacies of Slavery and Chieftaincy Succession Disputes among the Bakossi Community of Cameroon, 1960–2020.” Journal of African Interdisciplinary Studies 7 (6): 81–89.
Ntlama, N. 2020. “The Changing Identity on Succession to Chieftaincy in the Institution of Traditional Leadership: Mphephu v Mphephu- Ramabulana (948/17) [2019] ZASCA 58.” PER: Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 23: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2020/v23i0a6804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2020/v23i0a6804
Osman, F. 2019. “The Consequences of the Statutory Regulation of Customary Law: An Examination of the South African Customary Law of Succession and Marriage.” PER: Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 22 (1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a4337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a4337
Patton, M. Q. 2015. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Rakhadani, T., interviewed by by Veestyle Studios. 2021. “The Origin of Vhavenda Tribe Episode 2: Vhavenda ndi Vhonnyi?” YouTube video, 54:19, September 19, uploaded by Veestyle Studios. Accessed November 11, 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRqo3P9br4c&t=2846s.
Robinson, A. L. 2024. “Inventing Traditional Authority: Lhomwe Chiefs in Malawi.” Journal of Modern African Studies 62 (1): 25–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X23000447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X23000447
Ross, R., A. K. Mager, and B. Nasson, eds. 2010. The Cambridge History of South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521869836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521869836
Said, E. W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
Schwandt, T. A. 2007. The Sage Dictionary of Qualitative Inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412986281
Shingange, T. 2021. “African Pentecostal Mission and New Religious Movements: A Critical Scrutiny of Threats and Opportunities to Evangelization in Dialogue with Allen Heaton Anderson.” Missionalia: Southern African Journal of Missiology 49 (1): 21–41. https://doi.org/10.7832/49-0-411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7832/49-0-411
Sibisi, S. 2025. “A Critical Discussion of the Law Regarding the Recognition of Traditional Leaders and the Role of the Royal Families in South Africa.” PER: Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 28: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2025/v28i0a16683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2025/v28i0a16683
Tseer, T., and M. Sulemana. 2022. “Collaboration between Traditional and Central Authorities in Chieftaincy Succession Conflicts Management in Ghana: Evidence from Bole Traditional Area.” Frontiers in Human Dynamics 4: 934652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2022.934652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2022.934652
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright will be vested in Unisa Press. However, as long as you do not use the article in ways which would directly conflict with the publisher's business interests, you retain the right to use your own article (provided you acknowledge the published version of the article) as follows:
- to make further copies of all or part of the published article for your use in classroom teaching;
- to make copies of the final accepted version of the article for internal distribution within your institution, or to place it on your own or your institution's website or repository, or on a site that does not charge for access to the article, but you must arrange not to make the final accepted version of the article available to the public until 18 months after the date of acceptance;
- to reuse all or part of this material in a compilation of your own works or in a textbook of which you are the author, or as the basis for a conference presentation.
Accepted 2026-03-04
Published 2026-05-04