Gendered Experiences and Perceptions of Taboo Language among Tshivenḓa Speakers: A Sociolinguistic Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6697/22553Keywords:
taboo language, gender, sociolinguistics, Tshivenḓa, language attitudes, social normsAbstract
Taboo language is a socially and culturally regulated form of communication that reflects community values, social norms, and power relations. Although previous studies have examined linguistic taboos across cultural contexts, limited attention has been paid to the role of gender in shaping perceptions and experiences of taboo language within Tshivenḓa-speaking communities. Guided by Sociolinguistic Theory, this article investigates how male and female Tshivenḓa speakers perceive, experience, and respond to taboo language. A qualitative approach was employed, and data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 20 purposively selected Tshivenḓa-speaking participants. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. The findings reveal that men and women experience taboo language differently, shaped by culturally defined gender roles and social expectations. Women were found to be subject to stricter linguistic norms and stronger social sanctions than men, reflecting broader expectations regarding respectability and appropriate behaviour. The findings further indicate that taboo language functions as a mechanism of social regulation, through which gender identities and cultural values are maintained. At the same time, younger generations are increasingly challenging traditional linguistic restrictions, contributing to evolving language practices. The article argues that taboo language extends beyond linguistic prohibition and operates as a sociocultural mechanism through which gendered identities and power relations are negotiated. The study contributes to sociolinguistic scholarship by demonstrating how linguistic taboos reinforce and simultaneously reflect changing gender relations within Tshivenḓa-speaking communities.
References
Allan, K., and Burridge, K. 2006. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881
Babane, M. T., and Mushwana, A. 2021. "An Ethnographic Study of the Functions of Xitsonga Taboos in the 21st Century." Southern African Journal for Folklore Studies 31(2): 1-12. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-sajfs-v31-n2-a4
Blommaert, J. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Malden: Harvard University Press.
Braun, V., and Clarke, V. 2022. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036232078.n9
Bryman, A. 2016. Social Research Methods. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chabata, E. 2012. Taboo Language and Euphemism in African Languages. Harare: University of Zimbabwe Press.
Coates, J. 2015. Women, Men and Language. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315645612
Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. 2018. Research Methods in Education. 8th ed. London: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Creswell, J.W., and Poth, C.N. 2018. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 4th ed. London: Sage.
Diko, M. 2024. "An Existential Phenomenological Approach to Folklore as South Africa's Wealth in Context." African Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies 6(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.51415/ajims.v6i1.1164
Eckert, P. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Hoboken: Blackwell.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., and Johnson, L. 2006. "How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability." Field Methods 18(1): 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Holmes, J. 2013. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. 4th ed. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833057
Hymes, D. 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Jay, T. 2009. "The Utility and Ubiquity of Taboo Words." Perspectives on Psychological Science 4(2): 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01115.x
Labov, W. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lakoff, R. 1975. Language and Women's Place. New York: Harper and Row.
Lincoln, Y.S., and Guba, E.G. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Maḓadzhe, R. N. 2010. "Linguistic Taboos in Tshivenḓa: Communicating across Epochs." South African Journal of African Languages 30(2): 180-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2010.10587345
Mahwasane, M.M. 2020. "Language Flux: The Decline in the Use of Taboos Regarding Pregnancy and Birth among Vhavenda from a Critical Language Awareness Perspective." Doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa.
Maree, K. (ed.). 2016. First Steps in Research. 2nd ed. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
Mbulaheni, M. 2025. "The Use of Taboo Language in Tshivenḓa: Cultural Restrictions, Social Implications, and Changing Perspective." Journal of Intercultural Communication 25(3): 167-189. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v25i3.1148
Merriam, S.B., and Tisdell, E.J. 2016. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. 4th ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Meyerhoff, M. 2011. Introducing Sociolinguistics. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
Mudau, M.L. 2016. "Euphemism in Tshivenda: A Socio-pragmatic Analysis." Doctoral dissertation, University of Limpopo.
Omobola, T. 2013. "Taboo Language in African Societies." African Studies Review 56(1): 78-95. https://doi.org/10.1353/arw.2013.0014
Patton, M.Q. 2015. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Terre Blanche, M., and Durrheim, K. 2002. Research in Practice: Applied Methods for the Social Sciences. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press.
Trudgill, P. 2000. Sociolinguistics: An Introduction to Language and Society. 4th ed. London: Penguin Books.
Wardhaugh, R., and Fuller, J.M. 2021. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. 8th ed. Hoboken: Wiley.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright will be vested in Unisa Press. However, as long as you do not use the article in ways which would directly conflict with the publisher's business interests, you retain the right to use your own article (provided you acknowledge the published version of the article) as follows:
- to make further copies of all or part of the published article for your use in classroom teaching;
- to make copies of the final accepted version of the article for internal distribution within your institution, or to place it on your own or your institution's website or repository, or on a site that does not charge for access to the article, but you must arrange not to make the final accepted version of the article available to the public until 18 months after the date of acceptance;
- to reuse all or part of this material in a compilation of your own works or in a textbook of which you are the author, or as the basis for a conference presentation.
Accepted 2026-07-28
Published 2026-09-15