An Analysis of the Obligations of COMESA Public Procurement Regulations: The Case of Zimbabwe’s Public Procurement Regulatory Framework

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2521-2583/10902

Keywords:

public procurement, regional trade, integration, transparency, openness, cost-effective, competition, value for money, accountability, COMESA, Zimbabwe

Abstract

With the coming into force of the new Constitution in 2013, public procurement was given a constitutional status in Zimbabwe. The Constitution sets out vital principles that public procurement legislation must comply with. Moreover, it is a requirement of the Constitution that the governance of Zimbabwe must be pursued in accordance with Zimbabwe’s international law obligations. Zimbabwe is a founding member of the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA). To accelerate interstate trade, COMESA promulgated Public Procurement Regulations (PPR) for regional competitive bidding across member states. The viability of the regional trade agreements is hinged on mutual cooperation. Pursuant to the foregoing, member states are required to domesticate international agreements into their municipal laws. In 2017, the Zimbabwean legislature passed the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act 5 to give effect to the provisions of section 315(1) of the Constitution (Amendment No. 20), 2013. The public procurement reform agenda in Zimbabwe occurred close to a decade after the adoption of the public procurement regulations by COMESA in 2009. This article explores the obligations imposed on Zimbabwe pursuant to the public procurement regulations. This is done by identifying the public procurement principles enumerated in public procurement regulations, which are binding on member states. This article endeavours to answer the question: To what extent does the Zimbabwean legal framework conform to public procurement regulations? This article notes that the legal framework underlying public procurement in Zimbabwe, by and large, conforms to the bar set in the public procurement regulations. Nonetheless, it highlights Zimbabwe’s public procurement shortcomings. The article concludes by making possible legislative recommendations.

References

Anderson RD and Arrowsmith S, ‘The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Past, Present and Future’ in S Arrowsmith and RD Anderson (eds), The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Challenge and Reform (Cambridge University Press 2011) <https://doi.org/10.30875/50e883ea-en>

Appolloni A, ‘Public Procurement and Corruption in Africa: A Literature Review’ in F Decaloris and M Frey (eds), Public Procurement’s Place in the World: The Charge towards Sustainability and Innovation (Palgrave MacMillan 2014).

Arrowsmith S, Government Procurement in the WTO (Kluwer Law International The Hague 2003).

Arrowsmith S, The Law of Public and Utilities Procurement (2nd edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2005).

Arrowsmith S, Linarelli J and Wallace, D, Regulating Public Procurement: National and International Perspective (Kluwer Law International 2000).

Bolton P, ‘Government Procurement as a Policy Tool in South Africa’ (2006) 6 (3) Journal of Public Procurement <https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-06-03-2006-B001>

Bolton P, The Law of Government Procurement in South Africa (LexisNexis Butterworths 2007) <https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420054590.ch16>

Bovis CH, EU Public Procurement Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2007) <https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847205254.00011>

De la Harpe SPLR, ‘Public Procurement Law: A Comparative Analysis’ (PhD thesis, University of South Africa, 2009) <http://hdl.handle.net/10500/3848>

Freeman S, Justice and Social Contract Essays on Rawlsian Political Philosophy (Oxford University Press 2009).

Karangizi S, Regional Procurement Reform Initiative: COMESA Progress Report (World Trade Organization 2003) <https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/gproc_e/wkshop_tanz_jan03/karangizi1_e.doc> accessed 4 August 2021.

La Chimia A, ‘“Donors” Influence on Developing Countries’ Procurement Systems, Rules and Markets: A Critical Analysis’ in Arrowsmith S and Quinot G (eds), Public Procurement Regulation in Africa (Cambridge 2013) <https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847205254.00011>

Lysons K and Farrington B, Procurement and Supply Chain Management (Pearson Education Limited 2016).

OECD, Preventing Corruption in Public Procurement (2016) <https://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/Corruption-Public-Procurement-Brochure.pdf> accessed 23 July 2021.

OECD, Global Forum on Competition, Roundtable on Collusion and Corruption in Public Procurement (DAF/COMP/GF(2010)6, 15 October 2010) <https://www.oecd.org/competition/cartels/46235399.pdf> accessed 27 August 2021.

Ruswa C, ‘Why We Are We Refining Our Public Procurement System’ (SundayMail, 29 August 2021) <https://www.sundaymail.co.zw/why-we-are-refining-our-public-procurement-system> accessed 21 September 2021.

Quinot G and Arrowsmith S, ‘Introduction’ in G Quinot and S Arrowsmith (eds), Public Procurement Regulation in Africa (Cambridge University Press 2013) <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236058>

Quinot G, ‘An Institutional Legal Structure for Regulating Public Procurement in South Africa Final Report 2014: A Research Report on the Feasibility of Specific Legislation for National Treasury’s Newly Established Office of the Chief Procurement Officer’ (Funded by the Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of South Africa under Lot No. 11: Macro Economy, Statistics, and Public Finance Management, Request No. DCI-AFS/2013/330-767, March 2014) <http://africanprocurementlaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/OCPO-Final-Report-APPRRU-Web-Secure.pdf> accessed 4 September 2021.

Schick A, ‘Repairing the Budget Contract between Citizens and the State’ (2011) 11 (3) OECD Journal on Budgeting <https://doi.org/10.1787/16812336>

Trepte P, Regulating Procurement: Understanding the Ends and Means of Public Procurement Regulation (Oxford University Press 2004) <https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198267751.001.0001>

Walker H and Brammer S, ‘Sustainable Procurement in the United Kingdom Public Sector’ (2009) 14 (2) Supply Chain Management <https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540910941993>

Williams S and Quinot G, ‘Public Procurement and Corruption: The South African Response’ (2007) 124 (2) South African Law Journal <https://journals.co.za/doi/10.10520/EJC53750>

Legislation

Administrative Justice Act 12 of 2004.

Constitution of Zimbabwe (Amendment No. 20), 2013.

Public Entities Corporate Governance Act 4 of 2018.

Public Finance Management (General) Regulations, 2019.

Public Finance Management Act 11 of 2009.

Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets (General) Regulations, 2018.

Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act 5 of 2017.

Policy Documents

National Code on Corporate Governance Zimbabwe.

Cases

Road Accident Fund v Smith 2007 1 SA 172 (SCA).

International Legal Instruments and Conventions

COMESA Public Procurement Regulations.

COMESA Treaty.

Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council 2014 Official Journal of the European Union L 94/65.

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. Guide to Enactment of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Public Procurement; UNCITRAL Revised Model Law on Public Procurement of Goods and Services.

Published

2024-04-17

How to Cite

Panganayi, Freedom. “An Analysis of the Obligations of COMESA Public Procurement Regulations: The Case of Zimbabwe’s Public Procurement Regulatory Framework”. South African Yearbook of International Law, 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/2521-2583/10902.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2022-03-16
Accepted 2023-12-11
Published 2024-04-17