The Content and Function of Cosmopolitanism in a Selection of International Criminal Law Tribunals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/2521-2583/13457Keywords:
international criminal law argumentation, cosmopolitanism, Nuremberg and Tokyo International Military Tribunals, ICTY, ICTR, functions of philosophy in legal argumentAbstract
Reasoning and justifications before the international criminal tribunals and courts (ICTs) have not always strictly kept to legal rules and/or legal standards. At times, philosophical structures were used directly in argument. Consequently, this article is, in particular, concerned with cosmopolitanism in arguments and judgments from a selection of counsel and judges emanating from the Nuremberg and Tokyo International Military Tribunals as well as the ad hoc International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). It aims to provide an analysis of how the different generations of ICT and the different role-players therein used cosmopolitanism in their arguments. While not a treatise on cosmopolitanism as such, the article will identify and consider several broad cosmopolitan strands relevant to the selected arguments. The ensuing analysis will propose a taxonomy of specific arguments from the selected role-players addressing (1) the existence of a homogeneous civilisation and/or common morality as a descriptive truth or falsity, (2) the progressive realisation of the international society as a normative aspiration and (3) the relationship of the duty to the international community versus that owed to the domestic community of birth. Thereafter, the article will discuss plausible functions, in addition to persuasion, served by these arguments (including winning the case, undermining or supporting the legitimacy of the ICL proceedings in their entirety and/or controlling the subsequent historical narrative). Finally, the article will situate these investigations within the broader study of philosophy at the selected ICTs.
References
Augustine A, The City of God against the Pagans (RW Dyson tr, Cambridge University Press 2007).
Aurelius M, ‘Meditations’ in Irwin Edman (ed), Marcus Aurelius and His Times (Walter J Black 1945).
Austin J, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (John Murray 1832).
Boister N and Cryer R, The Tokyo International Military Tribunal: A Reappraisal (OUP 2008). <https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278527.001.0001> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278527.001.0001
Brown E, ‘Hellenistic Cosmopolitanism’, in Mary Louise Gill and Pierre Pellegrin (eds), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy (Blackwell Publishing 2012). <https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305845.ch28> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444305845.ch28
Cicero MT, ‘De Officiis’ in MT Griffin and EM Atkins (eds), Cicero on Duties (CUP 2009).
Cohen D and Totani Y, The Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal: Law, History, and Jurisprudence (CUP 2018) <https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316348659> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316348659
Cryer R, Hervey T, Sokhi-Bulley B and Bohm A, Research Methodologies in EU and International Law (Hart Publishing 2011).
Cryer R and Nell A, ‘The Philosophy of International Criminal Law’ in Alexander Orakhelashvili (ed), Research Handbook on the Theory and History of International Law (2nd edn, Edward Elgar 2020) <https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788116718.00016> DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788116718.00016
Cryer R, ‘International Criminal Tribunals and the Sources of International Law Antonio Cassese’s Contribution to the Canon’ (2012) 10 Journal of International Criminal Justice <https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqs075> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqs075
Donne J, ‘No Man is an Island’ in J Sparrow (ed), Devotions upon Emergent Occasions by John Donne (CUP 1923).
Dower N, The Ethics of War and Peace Cosmopolitan and Other Perspectives (Polity Press 2009).
Dugard J, Du Plessis M, Maluwa T and Tladi D, Dugard’s International Law a South African Perspective (5th edn, Juta 2018).
Dworkin R, Taking Rights Seriously (Harvard University Press 1977).
Etieyibo E, ‘Ubuntu, Cosmopolitanism, and Distribution of Natural Resources’ (2017) 46 Philosophical Papers <https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2017.1295616> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2017.1295616
Eze C, ‘Empathetic Cosmopolitanism: South Africa and the Quest for Global Citizenship’ (2021) 39 Strategic Review for Southern Africa <https://doi.org/10.35293/srsa.v39i1.329> DOI: https://doi.org/10.35293/srsa.v39i1.329
Fichtelberg A, ‘Liberal Values in International Criminal Law A Critique of Erdemović’ (2008) 6 Journal of International Criminal Justice <https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqm026> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqm026
Graness A, ‘Ubuntu and the Concept of Cosmopolitanism’ (2018) 28 Human Affairs <https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2018-0032> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2018-0032
Hierocles, ‘On Appropriate Acts’ in Ilaria Ramelli and David Konstan (trs), Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments, and Excerpts (Society of Biblical Literature 2009).
Kant I, Perpetual Peace A Philosophical Essay (MC Smith tr, George Allen and Unwin 1917).
Keenan JB and Brown BF, Crimes Against International Law (Public Affairs Press 1950).
Khan AH, ‘Inheriting a Tragic Ethos: Learning from Radhabinod Pal’ (2016) 110 AJIL Unbound <https://doi.org/10.1017/S2398772300002348> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2398772300002348
Kleingeld P and Brown E, ‘Cosmopolitanism’ in Edward Zalta (ed), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2019) <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/ cosmopolitanism/> accessed 27 September 2023.
Kopelman ES, ‘Ideology and International Law: The Dissent of the Indian Justice at the Tokyo War Crimes Trial’ (1991) 23 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics.
Laertius D, ‘Diogenes’ in Diogenes Hicks (tr), Diogenes Laertius Lives of Eminent Philosophers (Heinemann 1931).
Llewellyn K, ‘Some Realism About Realism’ (1931) 44 Harvard Law Review <https://doi.org/10.2307/1332182> DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1332182
McDonald GK, ‘The Eleventh Annual Waldemar A. Solf Lecture: The Changing Nature of the Laws of War’ (1998) 156 Military Law Review.
Nandy A, ‘The Other Within: The Strange Case of Radhabinod Pal’s Judgment on Culpability’ (1992) 23 New Literary History <https://doi.org/10.2307/469157> DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/469157
Nell A, ‘A Rhetorical Reading of Self–Other Polarities in Counsel Arguments Made Before the Trials of Major Criminals at Nuremberg and Tokyo’ (2022) 20 Journal of International Criminal Justice <https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqac016> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqac016
Ngcoya M, ‘Ubuntu: Toward an Emancipatory Cosmopolitanism?’ (2015) 9 International Political Sociology <https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12095> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12095
Nussbaum MC, ‘Kant and Stoic Cosmopolitanism’ (1997) 5 Journal of Political Philosophy 5. <https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00021> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00021
Plato, ‘The Republic’ in Francis M Cornford (tr), The Republic of Plato (OUP 1955).
Powderly J, ‘International Criminal Justice in an Age of Perpetual Crisis’ (2019) 32 Leiden Journal of International Law <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156518000675> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156518000675
Ramose MB, ‘Transcending Cosmopolitanism’ (2014) 59 Diogenes <https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192113493744>
Rinpoche S, The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying (Rider 2008).
Robinson D, ‘The Two Liberalisms of International Criminal Law’ in Carsten Stahn and Larissa van den Herik (eds), Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice (TMC Asser 2010) <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-495-0_7>
Röling BVA, International Law in an Expanded World (Djambatan 1960).
Röling BVA, The Tokyo Trial and Beyond Reflections of a Peacemonger (Antonio Cassese ed, Polity Press 1993).
Scharffs BG, ‘The Character of Legal Reasoning’ (2004) 61 Washington and Lee Law Review <https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2614136> DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2614136
Seneca LA, ‘De Otio’ in John Basore (tr), Seneca Moral Essays (Heinemann 1965).
Shahabuddeen M, International Criminal Justice at the Yugoslav Tribunal A Judge’s Recollection (OUP 2012) <https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199670826.001.0001> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199670826.001.0001
Stolk S, ‘“The Record on Which History Will Judge Us Tomorrow”: Auto- History in the Opening Statements of International Criminal Trials’ (2015) 28 Leiden Journal of International Law <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156515000552> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156515000552
Van Blerk AE, Jurisprudence an Introduction (Butterworths LexisNexis 1998).
Van Schaak B, ‘Crimen Sine Lege: Judicial Lawmaking at the Intersection of Law and Morals’ (2008) 97 Georgetown Law Journal.
Van Sliedregt E, ‘International Criminal Law: Over-Studied and Underachieving?’ (2016) Leiden Journal of International Law <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156515000618> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156515000618
Von Clausewitz C, On War (Penguin Books 1982).
Wacks R, Understanding Jurisprudence An Introduction to Legal Theory (3rd edn, OUP 2012) <https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199608263.001.0001> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199608263.001.0001
Cases
Prosecutor v Erdemović (Sentencing Judgment) IT-96-22-T (29 November 1996).
Prosecutor v Erdemović (Judgment) IT-96-22-A (7 October 1997) Joint Opinion of Judges McDonald and Vohrah.
Prosecutor v Kambanda (Judgment and Sentence) ICTR-97-23-S (4 September 1998).
Prosecutor v Krštić (Judgment) IT-98-33-A (19 April 2004).
Prosecutor v Kupreškić (Judgment) IT-95-16-T (14 January 2000).
Prosecutor v Ntakirutimana and Ntakirutimana (Judgment) ICTR-96-10-T & 96-17-T (21 February 2003).
Prosecutor v Plavšić (Sentencing Judgment) IT-00-39&40/1-S (27 February 2003).
Prosecutor v Tadić (Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction) IT-94-1 (2 October 1995).
Prosecutor v Tadić (Judgment) IT-94-1-A (15 July 1999). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316152416.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Accepted 2023-10-05
Published 2023-12-14
