Restrictions on Freedom of Religion in the Time of National Disaster—Lessons from Mohamed and Others v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2521-2583/14932

Keywords:

COVID-19, freedom of religion, freedom of movement, limitation of rights, fatwa, fiqh

Abstract

In late 2019, reports of a novel influenza-like virus emerged from China, whose Province of Wuhan was severely affected. It was not until February 2020 that the World Health Organisation was able to give this virus the name Covid-19. At that stage, the world was clearly dealing with a pandemic. Governments worldwide, including the South African government, responded by declaring a state of disaster and imposing restrictions on travelling and public assemblies. After declaring a state of disaster, the government promulgated the lockdown regulations, which prohibited, amongst others, congregating for religious purposes. A group of adherents of the Islamic faith felt aggrieved by these regulations, alleging that they were irrational and unreasonable, to the extent that they unfairly limited their freedom of movement and religion. They launched a constitutional challenge in the High Court in the case of Mohamed and Others v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others. In casu, the court had to deal with the novel issue of the limitation of rights in the context of a pandemic, as well as the rights of religious minorities.

References

Afshan Mohiuddin, Mehrunisha Seleman, Shoaib Rasheed and Aasim Padela, ‘When can Muslims Withdraw or Withhold Life Support? A Narrative Review of Islamic Juridical Rulings’ (2020) 31(1) Global Bioethics <https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2020.1736243> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2020.1736243

Amin Al-Astewani, ‘To Open or Close? Covid-19, Mosques and the Role of Religious Authority Within the British Muslim Community: A Socio-Legal Analysis’ (2021) 12 Religions. <https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12010011> DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12010011

Angelo Dube and Sibusiso Nhlabatsi, ‘The King Can Do No Wrong: The Impact of the Law Society of Swaziland V Simelane NO and Others on Constitutionalism’ (2016) 16(1) African Human Rights Law Journal <https://doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2016/v16n1a12> DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2016/v16n1a12

Arinda Truter, ‘Misinformation and Fake News on Covid-19 – Action Will Be Taken!’ (DML, 20 March 2020) <https://www.dmllaw.co.za/misinformation-and-fake-news-on-covid-19-action-will-be-taken/> accessed 4 October 2023.

Bradley Slade, ‘The “Law of General Application” Requirement in Expropriation Law and the Impact of the Expropriation Bill of 2015’ (2017) De Jure <https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2017/v50n2a8> DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2017/v50n2a8

Brazzeal Bradley, ‘Citations to Wikipedia in Chemistry Journals: A Preliminary Study’ (2011) Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship <https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1527> DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1527

Britannica, ‘History and Society – Shāfiʿī’ (Britannica, 11 July 2007) <https://www.britannica.com/topic/fiqh> accessed 5 November 2023.

David Morens, Gregory Folkers and Anthony Fauci, ‘What is a Pandemic’ (2009) 200 Journal for Infectious Diseases <https://doi.org/10.1086/644537> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/644537

Dara Grennan, ‘What is a Pandemic’ (2019) 321(9) JAMA Network <https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.0700> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.0700

Discovery, ‘Covid-19: What does it Mean to Flatten the Curve?’ (Discovery, 31 August 2020) <https://www.discovery.co.za/corporate/covid19-flatten-curve> accessed 4 October 2023.

Dylan Bould, Emily S Hladkowicz, Ashlee-Ann E Pigford, Lee-Anne Ufholz, Tatyana Postonogova, Eunkyung Shin and Sylvain Boet, ‘References that Anyone Can Edit: Review of Wikipedia Citations in Peer Reviewed Health Science Literature’ (2014) 348 British Medical Journal <https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1585> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1585

Evren Sünnetçı ̇oğlu, ‘Attendance at the Five Daily Congregational Prayers, Imams and Their Communities in the Jurisprudential Debates during the Ottoman Age of Sunnization’ (2020) Academia.

Gabriel Weimann, ‘Cyber-Fatwas and Terrorism’ (2011) 34(10) Studies in Conflict and Terrorism <https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2011.604831> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2011.604831

Human Rights Watch, ‘Part 1: Saudi Law’ (Human Rights Watch, March 2008) <https://www.hrw.org/reports/2008/saudijustice0308/5.htm> accessed 6 October 2023.

Jenifer Sills, ‘Academics can Help Shape Wikipedia’ (2017) 357(6351) Science <https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0462> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0462

Jessica Two and Martin Curtice, ‘The Islamic Faith and Best Interests’ (2019) 43 BJPsych Bulletin <https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2019.4> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2019.4

John Esposito, Islam: The Straight Path (3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2005).

Jonathan Brown, ‘Hadith’ (Oxford Bibliographies, 10 May 2017) <https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780195390155/obo-9780195390155-0030.xml> accessed 6 October 2023.

Mun’im Sirry, ‘Fatwas and Their Controversy: The Case of the Council of Indonesian Ulama (MUI)’ (2013) 44(1) Journal of Southeast Asian Studies <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463412000641> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463412000641

Nodar Karimov, ‘A Contested Muslim Identity in Kazakhstan: Between Liberal Islam and the Hanafi Project’ (2018) 6(5) Cultural and Religious Studies <https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2177/2018.05.004> DOI: https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2177/2018.05.004

Omar Awass, ‘Fatwa, Discursivity, and The art of Ethical Embedding’ (2019) 87(3) Journal of the American Academy of Religion <https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfz031> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfz031

Salman Muthalib, Tarmizi Jakfar, Muhammad Maulana and Lukman Hakim, ‘Changes in Congressional Prayer Practices during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Aceh from Maqashid Al-Sharia Perspective’ (2021) 16(2) Al Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial <https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v16i2.5250> DOI: https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v16i2.5250

United Nations Human Rights Office, ‘Minority Rights: International Standards and Guidance for Implementation’ (2010).

US Department of State, ‘2021 Report on International Religious Freedom: South Africa’ (US Department of State, June 2022) <https://www.state.gov/reports/2021-report-on-international-religious-freedom/south-africa/> accessed 4 October 2023.

World Health Organisation, ‘Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) outbreak’ (World Health Organisation, 7 April 2020) <http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov> accessed 18 May 2020.

World Health Organisation, ‘Novel Corona Virus Disease named COVID-19’ (World Health Organisation, 11 February 2020) <https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/events-as-they-happen> accessed 18 May 2020.

World Health Organisation, ‘What is a Pandemic?’ (WHO, 2020) <https://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/frequently_asked_questions/pandemic/en/> accessed 18 May 2020.

Worldometer, ‘Reported Cases and Deaths by Country or Territory’ (Worldometer, 2022)

<https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries> accessed 4 October 2023.

Cases

De Lange v Smuts NO and Others [1998] ZACC 6.

Engelbrecht v RAF 2007 (6) SA 96 (CC).

Mohamed and Others v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others (21402/20) [2020] ZAGPPHC 120

National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality and Another v Minister of Justice and Others [1998] ZACC 15.

Legislation

Disaster Management Act 57 of 2002.

Disaster Management Act (57/2002): Regulations made in terms of Section 27(2) by the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, Government Gazette 43148 of 25 March 2020.

South African Constitution of 1996.

Published

2023-12-13

How to Cite

Dube, Angelo. 2023. “Restrictions on Freedom of Religion in the Time of National Disaster—Lessons from Mohamed and Others V President of the Republic of South Africa and Others”. South African Yearbook of International Law 48:18 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/2521-2583/14932.
Received 2023-10-06
Accepted 2023-10-11
Published 2023-12-13