The Rugged Trajectory of Africa’s Reparations Agenda: From Aspiration to Claim and Action
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/2521-2583/15034Keywords:
reparations, Africa’s agenda, African Union, Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, strategiesAbstract
The first advances of Africa’s reparations agenda are traceable to the First International Conference on Reparations held in Nigeria in 1990. The profile of the subject was promptly raised to that of a regional undertaking at the level of the Organisation of African Unity (OAU) in 1991. The continent is henceforth seen to stumble into institutional formulations that lack the support infrastructure and formidability to operate. The momentum for reparations set by the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action of 2001 faltered in Africa, primarily because the continent prioritised development assistance, investment and market reforms with the very powers responsible for reparations. More than two decades after this conference, it is increasingly evident that reparations are crucial for dismantling the structural impoverishment that undermines even the most well-intentioned reforms. The African Union (AU) is currently resuscitating the continent’s reparations agenda, amid some gains by Africa’s diaspora, protracted litigation and advances by certain African societies and the renewal of the UN International Decade for People of African Descent, which is based on the pillars of recognition, justice and development. A continent’s reparations agenda must be guided by clear and established principles of engagement, driven by a formidable and sustainable institution, with continental-wide representation and consensus. A holistic agenda must unify the continent, in its diversity, around the core objective. It should include strategies that exert influence over the nations owing reparations to fulfil their obligations and be supported by authoritative African-centred thought leadership rooted in an authentic African conscience. It is a multi-sectoral, multi-dimensional, multidisciplinary, multi-layered and resilient venture.
References
Chike C, ‘Racism and the Case for Reparations: A Response to Michael Banner’ (2022) 3(1) Studies in Christian Ethics <https://doi.org/10.1177/09539468211050888>
Curry TJ, ‘The Political Economy of Reparations: An Anti-Ethical Consideration of Atonement and Racial Reconciliation under Colonial Moralism’ (2011) 18(1–2) Race, Gender and Class.
Hourcade R, ‘The Politics of Apology: Official Repentance and the Strategic Management of Guilt in a Former Slave Trade Port (Liverpool)’ (2020) 50(1) Ethnologie Française <https://doi.org/10.3917/ethn.201.0019>
Howard-Hassmann RE, ‘Reparations to Africa and the Group of Eminent Persons’ (2004) 173–174 Cahiers d’ études africaines <https://doi.org/10.4000/etudesafricaines.4543>
Howard-Hassmann RE, ‘Should the USA Offer Reparations to Africa for the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade?’ (2022) 59 Society 339–348 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-022-00682-3>
Laremont RR, ‘Political versus Legal Strategies for the African Slavery Reparations Movement’ African Studies Quarterly.
Martin BG, ‘Arab Migrations to East Africa in Medieval Times’ (1974) 7(3) The International Journal of African Historical Studies <https://doi.org/10.2307/217250>
Martin G, Understanding Social Movements (Routledge 2015) <https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203837092>
Namakula CS, ‘Reparations without Reparation: A Critique of the Germany-Namibia Accord on Colonial Genocide’ (2021) African Yearbook on International Humanitarian Law <https://doi.org/10.47348/AYIH/2021/a2>
Nzongola-Ntalaja G, ‘Reversing a Bloody Legacy’ (Fall 2020) The Wilson Quarterly <https://wilsonquarterly.com> accessed 16 October 2023.
Prugh CL, ‘“We Shall Be Telling Our Own Stories”: Bernie Grant, the Africa Reparations Movement and the Restitution of the Benin Bronzes’ (2022) Politique Africaine 165/1 <https://doi.org/10.3917/polaf.165.0143>
Swart M, ‘When the State Fails: The Role of the Khulumani Support Group in Obtaining Reparations for Victims of Apartheid’ <https://unisapressjournals.co.za/index.php/SAPL/article/download/2929/1723/14748> accessed 26 June 2023.
Yamamoto EK, ‘International Reparations: What Justice Amends Can and Should There Be?’ (2023) Southwestern Law Review.
Instruments
African Diaspora Programme of Action, Assembly/AU/17 (XIX).
African Reparation Act of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 2004.
Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross
Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law, A/RES/60/147.
Decision on Building a United Front to Advance the Cause of Justice and the Payment of Reparations to Africans Assembly/AU/Dec.847(XXXVI) (2023).
Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity, GA Res 2391, 26 November 1968.
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, GA Res 260 A (III) 9 December 1948.
Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, 2001.
Joint Declaration by the Federal Republic of Germany and the Republic of Namibia.
Resolution on Africa’s Reparations Agenda and the Human Rights of Africans in the Diaspora and the People of African Descent Worldwide, ACHPR/Res.543 (LXXIII) 2022.
Resolution of Reparation for Exploitation and Slavery in Africa, CM/Res.1339 (LIV) (OAU).
Resolution on the Reparations of the Wrong Done to Africa through the Exploitation and Slave Trade, CM/Res.1391 (LVI) (OAU).
Statute of the International Court of Justice.
Treaty of Friendship, Partnership and Co-operation between the Italian Republic and the Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 30 August 2008.
Cases
Hereros v Deutsche Afrika-Linien GMBLT & Co, US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Case No 06-1684, Decision of 10 April 2007.
Khulumani v Barclay National Bank, 504 F. 3d 254 (2d Cir 2007) and in re South African Apartheid Litigation, 617 F. Supp. 2d 228 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
Ndiku Mutua & Others v The Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Case No: HQ09X02666 of 2012.
Stewart v Somerset (1772) 98 ER 499.