Toward New International Standards on Emergencies: Extreme Emergencies and the New Negation of Fundamental Rights

Gerard Kamdem Kamga

doi:10.25159/2521-2583/9722

Authors

Gerard Kamdem Kamga University of the Free State

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2521-2583/9722

Keywords:

State of Emergency, State of Exception, State of Siege, Martial Law, Emergency Powers, Human Rights, Terrorism, Democracy

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to discuss what could soon become the new international standards on emergencies. The terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001 in the United States paved the way for the legalisation of practices and facts that until then were the trademark of totalitarian societies. While traditional emergencies such as a state of exception and a state of emergency are the object of strict regulations under domestic and international law, especially in terms of human rights protection, extreme emergencies account for a situation where owing to terrorism threats (real or alleged) fundamental rights, including non-derogable rights can now be brought to a standstill. At the heart of my paper, lies an assessment of contemporary legal systems that have reacted to terrorist threats with emergency measures that differ in nature from more traditional emergency powers, with the latter being more ‘legalistic’ and respectful of human rights guarantees.

References

Agamben G, State of Exception (University of Chicago 2005) <https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226009261.001.0001> DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226009261.001.0001

Amnesty International UK, ‘Annual Report: Human Rights Threatened by “War on Terror” (Press releases, 28 May 2003) <https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/annual-report-human-rights-threatened-war-terror> accessed 29 May 2021.

Amnesty International, Security and Human Rights Counter-Terrorism And The United Nations (2008) <https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp content/uploads/2021/07/ior400192008en.pdf> accessed 23 May 2021.

Benjamin W, ‘Critique of Violence’ the Continental Ethics Reader (Routledge 2003).

Dicey A, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (10th edn, Macmillan Press 1959).

Dyzenhaus D, The Constitution of Law Legality in a Time of Emergency (Cambridge University Press 2006) <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618246> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618246

Ferejohn J and Pasquino P, ‘The Law of the Exception: A Typology of Emergency Powers’ (2004) International Journal of Constitutional Law <https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/2.2.210> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/2.2.210

Fitzpatrick J, Human Rights in Crisis: The International System for Protecting Rights During States of Emergency (University of Pennsylvania Press 1994) <https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512815924> DOI: https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512815924

Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining <https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/dw4sd/themes/freedom-of-association/lang--en/index.htm> accessed 27 February 2021.

Gearty C, Can Human Rights Survive (Cambridge University Press 2006) <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167369> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167369

Hartman J, ‘Derogations from Human Rights Treaties in Public Emergencies - A Critique of Implementation by the European Commission and Court of Human Rights and the Human Rights Committee of the United Nations’ (1981) 22(1) Harvard International Law Journal.

‘Israel Seeks to Circumvent Doctors Who Refuse to Force-feed Hunger Strikers’ The Jerusalem Post (6 May 2017) <http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Israel-seeks-to-circumvent-doctors-who-refuse-to-force-feed-hunger-strikers-489898> accessed 7 February 2021.

Kamdem Kamga GE, ‘Killing Two Birds With One Stone: Insights Into the Recent Counterterrorism Legislation in Cameroon’ (2020) 53(2) VRÜ Verfassung und Recht in Übersee <https://doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-2020-2-190> DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-2020-2-190

Kelsen H, Pure Theory of Law (University of California Press 1967) <https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520312296> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520312296

Lumina C, ‘Counter-terrorism Legislation and the Protection of Human Rights: A Survey of Selected International Practice’ (2007) African Human Rights Law Journal.

Paust J, Beyond the Law the Bush Administration’s Unlawful Responses in the “War” on Terror (Cambridge University Press 2007) <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611322> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611322

Rossiter C, Constitutional Dictatorship (Crisis Government in the Modern Democracies) (Princeton University Press 1948).

The Right of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No 87) <https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312232> accessed 27 Fberuary 2021.

Schmitt C, Political Theology Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (MIT Press 1985).

Stempel J, ‘US Judge Says NSA Phone Surveillance is Lawful’ <http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/12/27/uk-usa-security-aclu-idUKBRE9BQ0D920131227> accessed 27 January 2021.

Timm T, ‘Banning All Encryption Won't Make us Safer, No Matter what David Cameron Says’ <http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jan/13/banning-encryption-david-cameron-not-safer> accessed 30 January 2021.

UN Economic and Social Council Commission on Human Rights ‘Status of the International Covenants on Human Rights’ para 42 and 43 7 (41st Session, E/CN.4/1985/4, 28 September 1984).

UNGA Res/57/219 (18 December 2002) UN Document A/RES/57/219 <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8227(02)00143-2> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8227(02)00143-2

Williams G, ‘The Legal Legacy of the “War on Terror”’ Macquarie Law Journal (2013) 12 (3)

L Zedner, ‘Seeking Security by Eroding Rights: The Side-stepping of Due Process’ in Benjamin Goold and Liora Lazarus, eds, Security and Human Rights (Hart Publishing 2007).