REMORSE AND REPENTANCE STRIPPED OF ITS VALIDITY. AMNESTY GRANTED BY THE TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH AFRICA

Authors

  • Eugene Baron University of South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2412-4265/110

Abstract

During the South African amnesty process perpetrators would get amnesty if they could prove that there was a political motive for committing their actions, their deeds were proportionate, that they happened during and between the years 1960 and 1994, and if they gave full disclosure. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the following: the fact that remorse and repentance were not required in order for perpetrators to get amnesty, left the reconciliation process in a vacuum. The inclusion of remorse and repentance as a requirement for amnesty, would have established a true (not a cheap) forgiveness and a ‘thick’ reconciliation process between perpetrators and victims. Remorse and repentance would have requested an admission and regret of wrongdoing, followed by an act of repentance underwritten by acts of contrition. 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Anderlini, SN, Conaway, CP & Kays, L. 2014. Transitional Justice and Reconciliation. Online Article. Accessed from http//www.huntalternatives.org. on 2009/08/15

Asmal & Asmal, K.L & Roberts, S 1996. Reconciliation through Truth. A Reckoning of Apartheid’s Criminal Governance. Cape Town: David Phillip Publishers.

Auger, S 2007. Healing the Wounds of a Nation: The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa. Online Article. Accessed from http//www.drake.edu.za. On 2009/08/15

Augsburger, DW 1996. Helping People Forgive. Louiseville, Kentucky: Westminster John Knox Press.

Borer, TA 2004. Reconciling South Africa or South Africans? Cautionary notes from the TRC. African studies Quaterly, Vol. 8(1) pp 19-36.

Botman, HR & Petersen, RM 1996. To Remember and to Heal. Cape Town: Human and Rousseau Publishers.

Cochrane, J & De Gruchy, J & Martin, S 1999. Facing the Truth. South African Faith Communities and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Cape Town: David Phillip Publishers.

Comfort, and Elwell WA (Eds) 2001. Tyndale Bible Dictionary. Philippines: Tyndale House Publishers.

Dorsman, R, Hartman, H & Noteboom-Kronemeijer, L 1999. Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa and the Netherlands. Netherlands: Netherlands Institute of Human Rights.

Gregorowski, C 2003. Understanding Forgiveness in the context of political violence: Five Case Studies from South Africa. Honours Research Project. Cape Town: Cape Town University

Grudem, W 1994. Systematic Theology. England: Inter Varsity Press.

Hayford, JW 1997. Van Cleave, Nathaniel: God’s way to wholeness: Divine Healing by the Power of the Holy Spirit. Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers.

James, W & Van De Vijver, L 2000. After the TRC: Reflections on Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa. Cape Town: David Phillip Publishers.

Krog, A 1998. Country of my skull. South Africa: Random House Publishers.

MacDonald & Farstad, A 1995. Believers Bible Commentary: Old and New Testaments. Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers.

Maluleke, TS 2001. Can Lions and Rabbits Reconcile? The South African TRC as an instrument for peace building. Ecumenical review, Vol. 53(1) pp. 190-201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-6623.2001.tb00095.x

Mounce, WD 2006. Mounce’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old & New Testament Words. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishers.

Olson, RP 1997. The Reconciled Life. A Critical Theory of Counseling. London: Westport, Connecticut Publishers.

Orr, J 1915. The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: 1915 Edition. Albany, OR: Ages Software Publishers.

Rush, C 1999. Repentance, Remorse, Judas and Peter. Online sermon. Accessed from www.christchurchsummit.org, 3-11-2009.

Sarkin, J 2004. Carrots and Sticks: The TRC and the South African Amnesty Process. Cape Town.

Schreiter, RJ 1998. The Ministry of Reconciliation. Spirituality and Strategies. New York: Orbis Publishers.

Torens (ed), JS 1999. Reconciliation cannot be achieved without forgiveness on the part of individual victims, as well repentance by the aggressors. America Newspaper.

TRC Report, 1998. Volume 1-6. Cape Town: CTP Book Printers.

Tutu, D 1999. No Future Without Forgiveness. New York: Doubleday Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5842.1999.tb00012.x

Verwoerd, WJ 1999. Toward the Truth about the TRC: A Response to key moral criticisms of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Religion and Theology Journal. Vol 3 (3). Pp. 303-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157430199X00209

Warrington, EL 1998. Dimensions of Forgiveness. Psychological Research & Theological Perspectives. London: Templeton Foundation Press.

Downloads

Published

2015-08-03

How to Cite

Baron, Eugene. 2015. “REMORSE AND REPENTANCE STRIPPED OF ITS VALIDITY. AMNESTY GRANTED BY THE TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH AFRICA”. Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae 41 (1):169-84. https://doi.org/10.25159/2412-4265/110.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2015-02-13
Accepted 2015-05-08
Published 2015-08-03