The Apocryphal Paul as Divided Martyr: The Rhetoric of Schism and Legitimacy in Early Christian North Africa

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2412-4265/8933

Keywords:

apostle Paul, martyrdom, Donatist Controversy, Tertullian, Augustine, Optatus, apocryphal acts, Cyprian

Abstract

Neither the epistles of Paul (authentic or disputed) nor the Acts of the Apostles address the death of the apostle, but this is a focus in the later apocryphal acts. This article examines the importance of this image of Paul as a martyr for the development of early Christianity in North Africa. Evidence from Tertullian, from texts describing the death of Cyprian of Carthage, and from the writings of Augustine, demonstrates that Paul was the model martyr for the African church. Paul’s status as such became a major point of contention in the competing claims to authority and legitimacy during the Donatist Controversy. The article analyses rhetorical claims to the Pauline legacy from the Caecilianist side (the writings of Optatus of Milev and Augustine) and the Donatist side (a mosaic from Uppenna and the Acts of the Abitinian Martyrs). Each side claimed that their martyrs were the true successors of Paul, and therefore they were the true Christians in Africa.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2021-06-02

How to Cite

Eastman, David L. 2021. “The Apocryphal Paul As Divided Martyr: The Rhetoric of Schism and Legitimacy in Early Christian North Africa”. Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae 47 (1):18 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/2412-4265/8933.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2021-01-08
Accepted 2021-05-05
Published 2021-06-02