Does the Return/Refund and Retention of Lobolo Violate the Reproductive Rights of Women in South Africa?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-3062/10071Keywords:
Return and retention of lobolo, customary law, feminism, reproductive rightsAbstract
One of the main functions of lobolo is to create a marriage relationship between the bride’s kindred and the groom’s family. Lobolo, which must be practised subject to the Constitution, still plays a significant role in the lives of many South Africans today. However, we concede that there are some instances in which lobolo has been abused to infringe women’s reproductive rights. The apprehension that lobolo may be refunded puts unnecessary pressure on women, thereby infringing and violating their right to freely decide on reproductive issues free of discrimination and pressure. The practice of lobolo is evolving, but approaches to its return or refund are not homogenous. Some families may insist that lobolo be returned while others will not. In South Africa, the solemnisation, and the legal process for terminating a customary marriage is now regulated by the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 1998 (Recognition Act). Lobolo is not explicitly mentioned as a requirement for the validity of a customary marriage. Additionally, the Act does not contemplate refunding or retention of lobolo during the termination of a customary marriage through divorce. Section 8 of the Recognition Act makes it possible for a customary marriage to be terminated by a decree of divorce, approved by a competent court, thus making it possible to dissolve a customary marriage like its civil counterpart. In this article, we interrogate whether the claim for a lobolo refund violates the reproductive rights of South African women. We use feminism as the theoretical lens through which we view and answer the question and draw some modest lessons from Eswatini and Zimbabwe, and to some limited extent, Uganda.
Metrics
References
Anyogu F and Chineze SI, ‘A Comparative Exposition of Customary Law Marriage in Nigeria and South Africa’ (2020) 2(2) International Journal of Comparative Law and Legal Philosophy.
Barnett H, Introduction to Feminist Jurisprudence (Routledge 2013) <https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843142720> DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843142720
Bayi C and Hawthorne L, ‘Colonialisation of Lobolo’ (2018) 81 Tydskrif vir Hedendaagse Romeins-Hollandse Reg.
Bekker JC and Koyana D, ‘The Legislative Reconstruction of the Customary Law of Marriage’ (2014) 77 Journal of Contemorary Roman-Dutch Law.
Bekker JC and Maithufi IP, ‘The Dissolution of Customary Marriages in South Africa’ (2001) Obiter.
Bekker JC, Seymour’s Customary Law in Southern Africa (5th edn, Juta 1989).
Bennett TW, A Sourcebook of African Customary Law for Southern Africa (Juta 1991).
Biko S, I Write what I Like (Picador Africa 2004).
Brandel M, ‘Urban Lobolo Attitudes: A Preliminary Report’ (1958) 17 African Studies <https://doi.org/10.1080/00020185808707044> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00020185808707044
Cakata Z and Ramose MB, ‘When ukucelwa becomes Bride Price: Spiritual Meaning Lost in Transition’ (2021) African Identities <https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2021.1940091> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2021.1940091
Chanock M, ‘Culture and Human Rights: Orientalising, occidentalising and Authenticity’ in M Mamdani (ed), Beyond Rights Talk and Culture Talk (David Philip 2000).
Chigwedere A, Lobola: The Pros and Cons (Books of Africa 1982).
Chirwa DM and Mbazira C, ‘Constitutional Rights, Horizontality, and the Ugandan Constitution: An Example of Emerging Norms and Practices in Africa’ (2020) 19(4) International Journal of Constitutional Law <https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa081> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa081
Chireshe E and Chireshe R, ‘Lobola: The Perceptions of Great Zimbabwe University Students’ (2010) 3(9) Journal of Pan African Studies.
Curren E and Bonthuys E, ‘Customary lawand Domestic Violence in Rural South African Communities: Notes and Comments’ (2005) 21 South African Journal on Human Rights <https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2005.11865145> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2005.11865145
Delmar R, What Is Feminism?’ In Theorizing Feminism (Routledge 2018) <https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494277-2> DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494277-2
Dlamini CRM, ‘A Juridical Analysis and Critical Evaluation of Ilobolo in a Changing Zulu Society’ (unpublished LLD Thesis, University of Zululand 1983).
Dlamini CRM, ‘The Transformation of a Customary Marriage in Zulu Law’ (1983) Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa.
Dlamini CRM, ‘The Modern Legal Significance of Ilobolo in Zulu Society’ (1984) De Jure.
Eniola BO and Aremo J, ‘Bride Price and Sexual and Reproductive Rights of Women: A Case Study of South Africa and Nigeria’ (2020) 96 Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization.
Evans–Pritchard EE, ‘Bridewealth Among the Nuer’ (1947) 6 African Studies <https://doi.org/10.1080/00020184708706744> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00020184708706744
Gan O, ‘Contractual Duress and Relations of Power’ (2013) 36 Harvard Journal of Law and Gender.
Goldin B and Gelfand M, African Law and Custom in Rhodesia (Juta 1975).
Gouws A, ‘Multiculturalism in South Africa: Dislodging the Binary between Universal Human Rights and Culture/Tradition’ (2013) 40 (01) Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies <https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2013.765674> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2013.765674
Grassi S, ‘Feminist Utopias, Queerness and Paul Goodman’ (2020) 126(1) Feminist Review <https://doi.org/10.1177/0141778920944389> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0141778920944389
Hamlyn DW, The Psychology of Perception: A Philosophical Examination of Gestalt Theory and Derivative Theories of Perception (Routledge 2017) <https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315473291> DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315473291
Harries CL, The Laws and Customs of the Bapedi and Cognate Tribes of the Transvaal (Hortors 1929).
Himonga C, Nhlapho IP, Maithufi IP, Mnisi S, Mofokeng L and Ndima D, African Customary Law in South Africa: Post–Apartheid and Living Law Perspective (Oxford University Press 2014).
Knoetze E, ‘Value (X 2)+ Fine=Damages? Notes on the Imposition of Sanctions by the Courts of Chiefs (Senior Traditional Leaders) and Headmen’ (2014) 35 (3) Obiter.
Kovacks RJ, ‘Twelve Years Later: How the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act of 1998 is Failing Women in South Africa’ (2013) Acta Juridica.
Koyana DS, Customary lawin a Changing Society (Juta 1980).
Makama RE, ‘Constructions, Negotiations and Performances of Gender and Power in Lobolo: An African-Centred Feminist Perspective’ (PhD Thesis, University of South Africa 2020).
Mangena F, ‘Can Africana Women Truly Embrace Ecological Feminism?’ (2014) 3(2) Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions <https://doi.org/10.4314/ft.v3i2.8> DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/ft.v3i2.8
Mangena T and Ndlovu S, ‘Implications and Complications of Bride Price Payment among the Shona and Ndebele of Zimbabwe’ (2013) 3(2) International Journal of Asian Social Science.
Manthwa TA, ‘A Re-interpretation of the Families’ Participation in Customary Law of Marriage’ (2019) 82 Tydskrif vir Hedendaagse Romeins-Hollandse Reg.
Masuku CN, ‘Employed and Unemployed Women’s Perceptions of Lobolo: A Q-Methodological Approach’ (Master Dissertation, University of Witwatersrand 2020).
Mathewson E, ‘Impact of Urbanisation on Lobola’ (1959) 10 Journal of Racial Affairs.
May J, Zimbabwean Women in Customary and Colonial Law (Mambo Press 1983).
Mattar LD, ‘Legal Recognition of Sexual Rights: A Comparative Analysis with Reproductive Rights’ (2008) 5 Sur. Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos <https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-64452008000100004> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-64452008000100004
Mkhabela H, ‘The Effects and Human Rights Implications of the Dissolution of a Swazi Customary Law Marriage’ (LLM dissertation, University of Pretoria 2017).
Mofokeng L, ‘The Lobolo Agreement as the “Silent” Prerequisite for the Validity of a Customary Marriage in terms of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act’ (2005) 68 Tydskrif vir Hedendaagse Romeins–-Hollandse Reg.
Maxwell SZ, ‘A Theoretical Exposition of Feminism and Womanism in African Context’ (2017) 15(2) Gender and Behaviour.
Monning HO, The Pedi (Van Schaik 1967).
Montle ME, ‘Conceptualising Lobola as a Perpetuator of Gender-Based Violence in South Africa through Intsika’ (2020) 17(7) Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities.
Mubangizi JC, ‘An Assessment of the Constitutional, Legislative and Judicial Measures against Harmful Cultural Practices that Violate Sexual and Reproductive Rights of Women in South Africa’ (2015) 16(3) Journal of International Women’s Studies.
Mujuzi JD, ‘Reconciling Customary Law and Cultural Practices with Human Rights in Uganda’ (2020) Obiter <https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v41i2.9148> DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v41i2.9148
Mwambene L and Kruuse H, ‘Form Over Function? The Practical Application of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act in South Africa’ (2013) Acta Juridica.
Ncube W, Law, Culture, Tradition and Children’s Rights in Eastern and Southern Africa (Ashgate 1998).
Ncube W, ‘No Fault Divorce: Changing Divorce Laws in Zimbabwe’ (1988) 6 Zimbabwe Law Review.
Ngema NM, ‘Considering the Abolition of Ilobolo: Quo Vadis South Africa?’ (2012) 2 Speculum Juris.
Ngema NM, ‘The Enforcement of the Payment of Lobolo and Its impact on Children’s Rights in South Africa’ (2013) 16(1) Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal <https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v16i1.12> DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v16i1.12
Nhlapo RT, Marriage and Divorce in Swazi Law and Custom (Websters 1992).
Nkosi T, ‘The Ending of a Customary Marriage: What happens to the Ilobolo?’ (2013) 36 De Rebus.
Nkomo SN, ‘A Critical Analysis of Zimbabwe’s Legal Response to Traditional Cultural Practices and Gender-based Violence’ (LLM Mini-Dissertation, University of Cape Town 2014).
Nyberg Anja, ‘Achieving Reproductive Justice: Some Implications of Race for Abortion Activism in Northern Ireland’ (2020) 124(1) Feminist Review <http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0141778919894912> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0141778919894912
Jansen RM, ‘Multiple Marriages, Burial Rights and the Role of Lobolo at the Dissolution of the Marriage’ (2003) 28(1) Journal of Juridical Science <https://doi.org/10.4314/jjs.v28i1.27134> DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/jjs.v28i1.27134
Jeffrey MD, ‘Lobolo is Child–Price’ (1951) 10 African Studies <https://doi.org/10.1080/00020185108706853> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00020185108706853
Kuper H, The Swazi – A South African Kingdom (Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1963).
Olivier NJJ, Indigenous Law (Butterworths 1995).
Preston–Whyte E in WD Hammond–Tooke (ed), The Bantu–Speaking Peoples of Southern Africa (2nd edn, Routledge and Kagan Paul 1974).
Princewill CW, Tenzin W, Jegede AS, Riecher–Rössler A and Elgar BS, ‘Bride Price Payment and Women’s Autonomy: Findings from Qualitative Interviews from Nigeria’ (2019) 59(7) Women and Health <https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2018.1549645> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2018.1549645
Pruitt LR, ‘A Survey of Feminist Jurisprudence’ (1994) 16 University of Arkansas Little Rock Law Review.
Schapera I, A Handbook of Tswana Law and Custom (Frank Cass 1970).
Shenje–Peyton A, ‘Balancing Gender, Equality, and Cultural Identity: Marriage Payments in Post– Colonial Zimbabwe’ (1996) 9 Harvard Human Rights Journal.
South African Law Reform Commission, Project 90: The Harmonisation of the Common Law and the Indigenous Law (SALRC 1998).
United Nations, ‘Reproductive Rights are Human Rights’ (A Handbook for National Human Rights Institutions 2014).
Taylor D, ‘Converting Attitudes of Church, State and Courts to Lobolo, Polygyny, Succession and Labour in the 19th Century South Africa’ (2005) 11(2) Fundamina.
Van Tromp J, Xhosa Law of Persons: A Treatise on the Legal Principles of Family Relations among the Ama-Xhosa (Juta 1947).
Vengesayi P, ‘Lobola (Bride Price) Culture and the Equality of Women in Zimbabwe’ (2018) 12 Pretoria Student Law Review <https://doi.org/10.29053/pslr.v12i.1887> DOI: https://doi.org/10.29053/pslr.v12i.1887
Volpp L, ‘Feminism versus Multiculturalism’ (2001) 101(5) Columbia Law Review <https://doi.org/10.2307/1123774> DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1123774
Zungu EB, ‘Opacity, Commodification and Power Dynamics: A Narrative Analysis of “Uthando Nesithembu’ (2019) 18(1) Indilinga African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge. Systems.
International Human Rights Instruments
Convention on the Rights of the Child (adopted 20 November 1989, entered into force 2 September 1990).
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol (adopted 13 December 2006, entered into force 3 May 2008).
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 3 January 1976).
International Conference on Population Development (ICPD), Program of Action, UN Doc. A/Conf.171/13 1994.
Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa, 2003.
Legislation
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996.
Customary Marriages Act 6 of 1997.
Divorce Act 70 of 1979.
Marriage Act 18 of 1989.
Matrimonial Causes Amendment Act 11 of 1987.
Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998.
Case law
Attorney General and Kenneth Kakuru v Mifumi (U) Ltd. and others, Constitutional Appeal No. 02 of 2014 (unreported) (Uganda).
Ciliza v Ciliza 1956 NAC (N–E) 127.
Chewa v Bvuta 1928 SR 98.
Daniel v Teresa 1972 AAc 17.
Doni M and Another v Nkebese D 15 NAC (1943) 51 (Mount Ayliff).
Fadzai alb Kurevawabva v Nyamandi 1978 AAc 8.
Gweni v Mhlalo (1913) 3 NAC 179.
Jas v Mpunga 1946 NAC (C&0) 5.
Jokokonya v Diana and Machingura 1944 SRN 47.
Katekwe v Muchabaiwa 1984 (2) ZLR 117 (SC) 84 <https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00060a002>
Kuredzimwe v Musariri 1999 (2) ZLR 20 (HC).
Mangwende v Machodo (CIV A 386 of 2014) [2015] ZWHHC.
Manjezi v Sirunu 1950 NAC 252 (S).
Maseti v Meme 1 NAC (1894–1909) 119 (Willowvale).
Mayeki v Kwababa (1918) 4 NAC 193.
Mifumi (U) Ltd v Attorney General (Constitutional Appeal No. 02 of 2014) [2015] UGSC 13 (6 August 2015).
Mujawo v Chogugudza 1992 (2) LLR 32 (SC).
Mutaisi v Muzondo 1999 ZLR 435 (HC).
Ncose v Nandile 4 NAC 197 (1920).
Njokonya v Diana and Machingura 1944 SRN 47.
Nkuna v Kazamula 1941 NAC (N&T) 61.
Nondiwa Munwutimi 1952 SRN 29.
Ndatambi v Ntokaze 1 NAC 3 (1895).
Nyanzeka Didi v Thomas Maxwele 4 NAC (1918–22) 198 (Umtata).
Ochom v Okwap (Civil Appeal No. 11 of 2012) [2014] UGHCCD 66 (7 May 2014).
Samuel Myeni Mhlawe v Beatrice Tholakele Seyama and two others (56/2016) [2017] SZSC 41 (9 October 2017).
Shoniwa v Risi and Mubayiwa 1944 SR 275.
Siyekile v Qike 1 NAC 73 (1904). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.2245.73 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.2245.73
Thembisile and another v Thembisile and another 2002 (2) SA 209 TPD <https://doi.org/10.1126/stke.2002.117.tw49> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/stke.2002.117.tw49
Teresa and Gwabani v Akupusa 1958 SRN 549.
Tusi v Cekwaan and Another 1939 NAC (N&T) 63.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
© Published by the Department of Public, Constitutional and International Law, University of South Africa and Unisa Press.
Accepted 2023-02-15
Published 2023-06-08
