Assessing the Effectiveness of Extradition and the Enforcement of Extra-territorial Jurisdiction in Addressing Trans-national Cybercrimes

Phenyo Sekati

doi:10.25159/2522-3062/10476

Authors

Phenyo Sekati University of Pretoria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6365-2415

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-3062/10476

Keywords:

Cybercrimes, trans-national, traditional crimes, international co-operation, extradition laws, mutual assistance

Abstract

Cyberspace operates on a geographically borderless platform, thus often rendering national laws ineffective in regulating the impact of cyber-related activities outside South African borders. Recognising this issue, South Africa adopted the Cybercrimes Act, which permits the exercise of extra-territorial jurisdiction over trans-national cyber-related offences. The enforcement and effectiveness of extra-territorial jurisdiction and extradition law have, however, proven to be challenging and controversial in the international sphere. Issues such as internet fragmentation, contrasting municipal laws, and uncoordinated regulatory actions across state boundaries have undermined existing provisions regulating trans-national cybercrimes. These issues are furthered by the increased recognition of human rights, such as the right to privacy, which has deterred international cooperation and collaboration as states are subsequently required to subject their own citizens and entities to increased interception and scrutiny. The main thesis of this investigation is aimed at reviewing the practical implications surrounding the enforcement of extra-territorial jurisdiction and extradition law over trans-national cybercrimes. To this end, states are implored to develop both domestic and multilateral cybercrime laws and to improve existing enforcement mechanisms outlined in extradition law and mutual assistance agreements.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ajayi EFG, ‘Challenges to Enforcement of Cyber-crimes Laws and Policy’ (2016) 6(1) Journal of Internet and Information Systems <https://doi.org/10.5897/JIIS2015.0089> DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/JIIS2015.0089

Akehurst A, ‘Jurisdiction in International Law’ (1974) 46 British Yearbook of International Law.

Bassiouni C, ‘Ideologically Motivated Offenses and the Political Offenses Exception in Extradition - A Proposed Juridical Standard for an Unruly Problem’ (1969) 19 DePaul Law Review.

Bassiouni C, ‘Universal Jurisdiction for International Crimes: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Practice’ (2001) 42 Virginia Journal of International Law.

Bhagattjee P, Govuza A & Sebanz S, ‘The Cybercrimes Act is One Step Away from Becoming Law’ (Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyer, 7 July 2020) <https://www.cliffedekkerhofmeyr.com/en/news/publications/2020/technology/tmt-alert-7-july-The-Cybercrimes-Act-is-one-step-away-from-becoming-law.htm> (accessed …

Blount PJ, Reprogramming the World: Cyberspace and the Geography of Global Order (E-International Relations, 2019).

Brenner SW and Koops BJ, ‘Approaches to Cybercrime Jurisdiction (2004) 4(1) Journal of High Technology Law.

Cafritz E and Tene O, ‘Article 113-7 of the French Penal Code: The Passive Personality Principle’ (2003) 41 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law.

Cantrell C, ‘The Political Offense Exemption in International Extradition: A Comparison of the United States, Great Britain and the Republic of Ireland’ (1977) 60 Marquette Law Review.

Council of Europe, ‘Chart of signatures and ratifications of Treaty 024’ Status as of 02 September 2021 <https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/webContent/en_GB/7752573?module=signatures-by-treaty&treatynum=024> (accessed

Cybercrime Convention Committee, ‘Rules on Obtaining Subscriber Information’ (Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, 3 December 2014) https://rm.coe.int/

Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, ‘Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Treaties’ <https://www.justice.gov.za/ilr/mla.html16802e7ad1>

Dlamini S, and Mbambo C, ‘Understanding Policing of Cyber-crime in South Africa: The Phenomena, Challenges and Effective Responses’ (2019) 5(1) Cogent Social Sciences <https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1675404> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1675404

D’Oliveria J, ‘International Co-operation in Criminal matters: The South African Contribution’ (2003) 16 South African Journal of Criminal Justice.

Dugard J, Du Plessis M, Maluwa T and, Tladi D, Dugard's International Law: A South African Perspective (Juta 2019).

Eisinger J, ‘Script Kiddies Beware: The Long Arm of U.S. Jurisdiction to Prescribe’ 59(4) Washington & Lee Law Review.

Ezeji C, Olutola A, and Bello P, ‘Cyber-Related Crime in South Africa: Extent and Perspectives of State’s Role-players’ (2018) 31 Southern African Journal of Criminology 93–110.

Farber DA, ‘Stretching the Margins: The Geographic Nexus in Environmental Law’ (1996) 48 Stanford Law Review <https://doi.org/10.2307/1229386> DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1229386

Ferreira A and others, ‘The Obligation to Extradite or Prosecute’ (2013) 1 UFRGS Model United Nations Journal.

Goby V, ‘Physical Space and Cyberspace: How Do They Interrelate? A Study of Offline and Online Social Interaction Choice in Singapore’ (2003) 6(6) CyberPsychology & Behavior. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/109493103322725414

Greenemeier L, ‘Seeking Address: Why Cyber Attacks Are So Difficult to Trace Back to Hackers’ (Scientific American, 11 June 2011) <https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/tracking-cyber-hackers/>

Hameed U, ‘AutDedereAutJudicare (Extradite or Prosecute) Obligation- Whether a Duty Rooted in Customary International Law?’ (2015) 5(9) International Journal of Humanities and Social Science.

Human Rights Watch, ‘Cybercrime is Dangerous, but a New UN Treaty could be Worse for Rights’ (13 August 2021) <https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/08/13/cybercrime-dangerous-new-un-treaty-could-be-worse-rights>

Jabbari C, ‘The Application of International Law in Cyberspace’ (United Nations, 25 October 2018) <https://www.un.org/disarmament/update/the-application-of-international-law-in-cyberspace-state-of-play/>

Johnson J, ‘Worldwide Digital Population as of October 2020’ (Statista, 27 January 2021) <https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/>

Kaspersky, ‘What is an IP Address - Definition and Explanation’ <https://www.kaspersky.com/resource-center/definitions/what-is-an-ip-address>

Keshetri N, ‘Cybercrime and Cybersecurity in South Africa’ (2019) 22(2) Journal of Global Information Technology Management <https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2019.1603527> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2019.1603527

Koigi B, ‘South Africa has third-highest number of cybercrime victims globally, report’ (Africa Tech, 4 June 2020) <https://africabusinesscommunities.com/tech/tech-news/south-africa-has-third-highest-number-of-cybercrime-victims-globally-report/>

Kyriakides E, ‘Critiquing DOJ’s Claim that the Budapest Convention Requires the Cloud Act’s Solution’ (Cross-Border Data Forum, 9 July 2019) <https://www.crossborderdataforum.org/critiquing-dojs-claim-that-the-budapest-convention-requires-the-cloud-acts-solution/>

Lehto M, ‘Cyberspace and Cyber Warfare’ (2018) 51 Information and Communication Security <https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcwt.2013070101>

Lehto M, ‘The Cyberspace Threats and Cyber Security Objectives in the Cyber Security Strategies’ (2013) 3(3) International Journal of Cyber Warfare and Terrorism. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcwt.2013070101

Lessig, L ‘The Zones of Cyberspace’ (1996) 48 Stanford Law Review <https://doi.org/10.2307/1229391> DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1229391

Maillart J, ‘The limits of subjective territorial jurisdiction in the context of cybercrime’ (2019) 19 ERA Forum <https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-018-0527-2> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-018-0527-2

Mbanaso UN, and Dandaura ES, ‘The Cyberspace: Redefining A New World’ (2015) 17 IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering.

Menthe DC, ‘Jurisdiction in Cyberspace: A Theory of International Spaces’ (1998) 4 Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review.

Michalsons, ‘Guide to ECT Act in South Africa’ (25 September 2008) <https://www.michalsons.com/blog/guide-to-the-ect-act/81>

Miller S, ‘Revisiting Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: A Territorial Justification for Extraterritorial Jurisdiction under the European Convention’ 20(4) The European Journal of International Law <https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chp078> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chp078

Mitchell C, Aut Dedere Aut Judicare: The Extradite or Prosecution Clause in International Law (Graduate Institute Publications, 2009) <https://doi.org/10.4000/books.iheid.249> DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.iheid.249

Musoni M, ‘Is Cyber Search and Seizure under the Cybercrimes and Cybersecurity Act Consistent with the Protection of the Protection of Personal Information Act?’ (2016) Obiter.

Oraegbunam I, ‘Towards Containing the Jurisdictional Problems in Prosecuting Cybercrimes: Case Reviews and Responses’ (2016) 7 Nnamdi Azikiwe University Journal of International Law and Jurisprudence.

Parliamentary Monitoring Group, ‘Cybercrimes Act (B6-2017) Act History’ <https://pmg.org.za/Act/684/>

Peters A, and Jordan A, ‘Countering the Cyber Enforcement Gap: Strengthening Global Capacity on Cybercrime’ (2020) 10(3) Journal of National Security Law and Policy.

Shaw MN, International Law (Cambridge University Press 2008).

Sofaer AD, ‘The Political Offense Exception and Terrorism’ (2020) 15(1) Denver Journal of International Law and Policy.

Taylor H, ‘What Are Cyber Threats and What to Do About Them’ (Prey Project, 22 January 2020) <https://preyproject.com/blog/en/what-are-cyber-threats-how-they-affect-you-what-to-do-about-them/>

Tunggal AT, ‘What is a Cyber Threat?’ (UpGuard, 25 November 2020) <https://www.upguard.com/blog/cyber-threat>

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, ‘Cybercrime Legislation Worldwide’ <https://unctad.org/page/cybercrime-legislation-worldwide>

Van Niekerk B, ‘An Analysis of Cyber Incidents in South Africa’ (2017) 20 The African Journal of Information and Communication.

Vagias M, ‘The Territorial Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court – A Jurisdictional Rule of Reason for the ICC’ (2012) 59 Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X12000034

Watney M, ‘A South African Perspective on Mutual Legal Assistance and Extradition in a Globalized World’ (2012) 15 Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal <https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v15i2.11> DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v15i2.11

Wise EM, ‘Some Problems of Extradition’ (1969) 15(2) Wayne Law Review.