Clarifying Jus Cogens, Erga Omnes and the Place of Third-party Countermeasures in International Law

Simon Mateus

doi:10.25159/2522-3062/13329

Authors

Simon Mateus University of Pretoria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9169-2799

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-3062/13329

Keywords:

jus cogens, erga omnes, countermeasures

Abstract

There is substantial support in literature of the idea that all norms of jus cogens are erga omnes, in that they produce obligations applicable towards all states. However, not all obligations erga omnes invariably flow from a jus cogens characterisation. Indeed, although this is the case, there is no simple criterion by which one can determine the extent of the overlap between jus cogens and erga omnes. This relationship is further complicated by questions relating to the kind of measures that states may be permitted to take in order to protect or ensure compliance with obligations erga omnes, bringing to light, the debates surrounding the concept and the place of third-party countermeasures regarding state responsibility. Against this backdrop, this article will assess the concept of obligations erga omnes, its relationship with jus cogens as well as the legal position and the place of third-party countermeasures in relation to the protection of obligations erga omnes and/or as a way of invoking state responsibility by reacting to breaches of international law obligations with erga omnes status.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Simon Mateus, University of Pretoria

The author is a NRF SARChI grantholder, and acknowledges that this article originated from his doctoral research.

References

Alarcon MJ, ‘Consequences of Recognizing Environmental Protection as an Emerging Erga Omnes Obligation in the ISDS Context’ Kluwer Arbitration Blog (2021).

Alexander A, ‘Ulf Linderfalk: Understanding Jus International Law and Legal Discourse’ (2020) 41 Liverpool Law Review <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-020-09256-x> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-020-09256-x

Alexidze L, ‘Legal Nature of Jus Cogens in Contemporary International Law’ (1981) Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law.

Alland D, ‘Countermeasures of General Interest’ (2002) European Journal of International Law < https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/13.5.1221> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/13.5.1221

Alland D, Justice privée et ordre juridique international: étude théorique des contre- mesures en droit international public (1994).

Andenas M and others (eds), General Principles and the Coherence of International Law

(2019).

Annacker C, ‘The Legal Regime of Erga Omnes Obligations Under International Law’ (1994) 46 Austrian Journal of Public International Law.

Arnardottir OM, ‘Res Interpretata, Erga Omnes Effect and the Role of the Margin of Appreciation in Giving Domestic Effect to the Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law <https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chx045> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chx045

Bassiouni CM, ‘International Crimes: Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes’ (1996) 59 Law and Contemporary Problems <https://doi.org/10.2307/1192190> DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1192190

Bills A, ‘The Relationship Between Third-Party Countermeasures and the Security Council’s Chapter VII Powers: Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law’ (JURM02 graduate thesis, Lund University 2019) <https://doi.org/10.1163/15718107-bja10003>

Brownlie I, Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press 1990).

Byers M, ‘Conceptualising the Relationship between Jus Cogens and Erga Omnes Rules’ (1997) 66 Nordic Journal of International Law <https://doi.org/10.1163/15718109720295265> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718109720295265

Cannizzaro E, The Law of Treaties beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford University Press 2011) <https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588916.001.0001> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588916.001.0001

Cassese A, Self-Determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal (Cambridge University Press 1995).

Crawford J, ‘The ILC's Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts: A Retrospect’ (2002) 96(4) American Journal of International Law. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3070683

Crawford J, Brownli’s Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press 2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199699698.001.0001

Crawford J, The Creation of States in International Law (Oxford University Press 1979).

Crawford J and others (eds), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford University Press 2010) <https://doi.org/10.2307/3070683>

Dugard J, International Law: A South African Perspective (Juta 1994).

Christenson GA, ‘Jus Cogens: Guarding Interests Fundamental to International Society’ (1987) 28 Virginia Journal of International Law.

Christiani DW, ‘The “Modern” Concept of Erga Omnes to Establish the Obligation of Impunity Eradication: Towards the Primacy Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court’ (2018) 5(2) Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum <https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v5n2.a1> DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v5n2.a1

Contreras-Garduno D and I Alvarez-Rio D, ‘A Barren Effort? The Jurisprudence of the Inter- American Court of Human Rights on Jus Cogens’ (2013) Social Science Research Network.

D’amato A, ‘It’s a Bird, it’s a Plane, it’s Jus Cogens’ (1990) 6 Connecticut Journal of International Law.

Dawidowicz M, ‘Third-party ountermeasures: A Progressive Development of International Law?’ (2016) 29 Questions of International Law.

Dawidowicz M, Third-party Countermeasures in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2017) <https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139046602> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139046602

De Beer AC, Peremptory Norms of General international law (jus cogens) and the prohibition of terrorism (Brill 2019) <https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004391543> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004391543

De Hoogh A, ‘The Relationship Between Jus Cogens, Obligations Erga Omnes and International Crimes: Peremptory Norms in Perspective’ (1991) 42 Österreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht.

De Hoogh A, Obligations Erga Omnes and International Crimes: A Theoretical Inquiry into the Implementation and Enforcement of the International Responsibility of States (Martinus Nihoff Publishers 1996) <https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004638983> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004638983

De Wet E, ‘The International Constitutional Order’ (2006) 55 International and Comparative Law Quarterly <https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei067>

De Wet E, The International Constitutional Order (Cambridge University Press 2006) <https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei067> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei067

De Wet E, ‘Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes’ (2013) Oxford Handbook on Human Rights <https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei067> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199640133.003.0024

De Wet E, ‘Invoking Obligations Erga Omnes in the Twenty-First Century: Progressive Developments Since Barcelona Traction’ (2013)38 South African Yearbook of International Law.

De Wet E and J Vidmar J, Hierarchy in International Law: The Place of Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2013) <https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199647071.001.0001> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199647071.001.0001

Dixon M, Textbook on International Law (Oxford University Press 1996).

Eggett C and Thin S, ‘Clarification and Conflation: Obligations Erga Omnes in the Chagos Opinion’ European Journal of International Law (Blog 21 May 2019).

‘Erga Omnes Obligation in the ISDS Context’ Kluwer Arbitration (Blog (2021).

Frowein J, ‘Reactions by Not Directly Affected States to Breaches of Public International Law’ (1994) Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International.

Gowlland-Debbas V and others, United Nations Sanctions and International Law (Kluwer Law International 2001) <https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004502871> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004502871

Janis M, ‘The Nature of Jus Cogens’ (1988) Connecticut Journal of International Law.

.

Kadelbach S, ‘Genesis, Function and Identification of Jus Cogens Norms’ (2015) 46 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-114-2_6

Netherlands Yearbook of International Law <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-114-2_6>

Koskenniemi M, ‘Solidarity Measures: State Responsibility as a New International Order?’ (2001) 72 British Yearbook of International Law <https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/72.1.337> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/72.1.337

Krivenko EY, ‘The ICJ and Jus Cogens Through the Lens of Feminist Legal Methods’ (2017) 28 (3) European Journal of International Law <https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chx043> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chx043

Lauterpacht L, The Development of International Law by the International Court (Cambridge University Press 1958).

Linderfalk U, ‘The Emperor’s New Clothes – What If No Jus Cogens Claim Can Be Justified?’ (2020) 22 International Community Law Review <https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341425> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341425

Linderfalk U, Understanding Jus Cogens in International Law and International Legal Discourse (Edward Elgar Publishing 2020) <https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786439512> DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786439512

Memeti A and Nuhija B, ‘The Concept of Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law’ (2013) 14 New Balkan Politics.

Meron T, ‘On a Hierarchy of International Human Rights’ (1986) The American Journal of International Law <https://doi.org/10.2307/2202481> DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2202481

Ndiaye TM and Wolfrum R, Law of the Sea, Environmental Law and Settlement of Disputes: Liber Amicorum Judge Thomas A Mensah (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2007) <https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004161566.i-0> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004161566.i-0

Orakhelashvili A, ‘Audience and Authority – The Merit of the Doctrine of Jus Cogens’ (2015) Netherlands Yearbook of International Law. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-114-2_5

Noori SM and Louyeh SE, ‘When Environmental Obligations Collide with State Sovereignty: An International and Sharia Law Perspective’ (2020) Consensus.

Orakhelashvili O, Peremptory Norms in International Law (Oxford University Press 2006) <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-114-2_5>

Petsche M, ‘Jus Cogens as a Vision of the International Legal Order’ (2010) Penn State International Law Review.

Picone P, ‘La Distinzione tra Norme Internazionali di Jus Cogens e Norme che Producono Obligghi Erga Omnes’ (2008) 91 Rivista di Diritto Internazionale.

Pigrau A, ‘Reflections on the Effectiveness of Peremptory Norms and Erga omnes Obligations Before International Tribunals, Regarding the Request for an Advisory Opinion From the International Court of Justice on the Chagos Islands’ (2018) 55 Questions of International Law.

Pomerance M, Self-Determination in Law and Practice: The New Doctrine in the United Nations (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1982).

Proukaki EK, The Problem of Enforcement in International Law: Countermeasures, the Non-Injured State and the Idea of International Community (Routledge 2010).

Ragazzi M, The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes (Clarendon Press 1997).

Schachter O, ‘International Law in Theory and Practice: General Course in Public International Law’ (1982) 178 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International.

Schwelb E, ‘Some Aspects of International Jus Cogens as Formulated by the International Law Commission’ (1967) 61 American Journal of International Law <https://doi.org/10.2307/2197345> DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2197345

Scobbie I, ‘The Invocation of Responsibility for the Breach of “Obligations under Peremptory Norms of General International Law”’ (2002) 13(5) European Journal of International Law <https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/13.5.1201> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/13.5.1201

Sebutinde J, ‘Is the Right to Self-Determination Jus Cogens Reflections on the Chagos Advisory Opinion’ in D Tladi, Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens) (Brill 2021) <https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004464124_016> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004464124_016

Seiderman ID, Hierarchy in International Law. The Human Rights Dimension (Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 2001).

Shelton D, ‘Sherlock Holmes and the Mystery of Jus cogens’ (2015) 46 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-114-2_2> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-114-2_2

Sicilianos LA, ‘Les Réactions Décentralisées à l’Illicite: Des Contre-Mesures à la Légitime Défense’ (1990) Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence.

Tams CJ, Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2005) <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494116> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494116

Tladi D, Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens): Disquisitions and Disputations (Brill 2021) <https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004464124> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004464124

Tomuschat C and Thouvenin J-M (eds), The Fundamental Rules of the International Legal Order (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2005) <https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004149816.i-472> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004149816.i-472

Zemanek K, ‘New Trends in the Enforcement of Erga Omnes Obligations’ (2000) 4 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law <https://doi.org/10.1163/187574100X00016> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/187574100X00016

Cases and Advisory Opinions

Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports (2010).

Advisory Opinion concerning Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, ICJ Reports (1996).

Advisory Opinion concerning the Reservations to the Convention on Genocide, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports (1951).

Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company Ltd (Second Phase) ICJ Rep (1970).

Case Concerning East Timor (Portugal v Australia) Judgment, ICJ Reports (1995) para 29; see also Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v Senegal) Judgment, ICJ Reports (2012).

Case concerning the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia) Preliminary Objections, Judgment, ICJ Reports (2008).

Case concerning the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia) Judgment (3 February 2015).

Case concerning the Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v United States) (Merits) ICJ Reports 14 (1986).

Case concerning the Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France) Judgment, ICJ Reports (1974).

Case concerning the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro) Judgment, ICJ Reports (2007).

Fisheries Case (United Kingdom v. Norway) Judgment, ICJ Reports (1951).

Judgment, ICJ Reports (2012).

Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) Notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970) (Separate opinion of Vice-President Ammoun).

Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965 Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports (2019).

North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands) Judgment, ICJ Reports (1969).

Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v Senegal).

Treaties, Conventions and Legislations

Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts 2001, 2011.

Charter of the United Nations1945.

Lomé I Convention 1976.

Statute of the International Court of Justice 1946.

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969.

Documents, Instruments and Reports

EU Council, ‘Basic Principles on the Use of Restrictive Measures (Sanctions)’ (2004).

ICC, Report by Dire Tladi on ‘Jus cogens in the Report of the International Law Commission’ (66th Session’ A/69/10 Annex (2014).

ILC, Conclusions of the Work of the Study Group on the Fragmentation of International law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law ICL Report of the International Law Commission (58th Session, General Assembly Official Records, (A/cn.4/L 682 (2006).

ILC, Kingdom of the Netherlands Comments 73rd Session (2021) <>https://legal.un.org/ilc/sessions/73/pdfs/english/jc_netherlands.pdf>. accessed 17 August 2021.

ILC, ‘First Report on Jus Cogens’ by Special Rapporteur Dire Tladi UN Doc A/CN 4 693 (2016).

ILC, Second Report on the Law of Treaties, by Special Rapporteur Sir Humphrey Waldock Yearbook of the International Law Commission (1963).

ILC, Fourth Report on Peremptory Norms of General International Llaw (Jus Cogens) by Special Rapporteur Dire Tladi /74/10 (2019).

ILC, ‘Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens)’ Statement of the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, Mr. Aniruddha Rajput (26 July 2017).

ILC, Recommendation of the Working-Group on the long-term programme of work, UN Doc A/69/10 (2014).

ILC, ‘Report of the Study Group on Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law’ A/CN 4/L.682 (2006).

ILC, Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission on the Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law by Special Rapporteur M Koskenniemi UN Doc A/CN 4/L682 (2006).

UN, Fifth report on identification of customary international law by M Wood (2018) <https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N18/043/79/PDF/N1804379.pdf?OpenElement> accessed 16 March 2021.

UNGA, Draft Conclusions on Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens), Report of the International Law Commission (Seventy-First Session, General Assembly Official Records (A/74/10) (2019).