Factors Militating against the Efficacy of the Mutual Agreement Procedure: A Comparison between South Africa, Kenya, Uganda and Ghana

Nelson Kekana

doi:10.25159/2522-3062/13641

Authors

Nelson Kekana North-West University https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1925-9939

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-3062/13641

Keywords:

transfer pricing, revenue authorities, multinational enterprises, mutual agreement procedure, dispute resolution

Abstract

The effective resolution of transfer pricing disputes has been identified as one of the primary challenges to eliminate double taxation and/or double non-taxation as well as to enhance the free flow of trade and investment. This article investigates the unique challenges faced by selected African countries, including South Africa, Kenya, Uganda and Ghana, which militate against the use of the mutual agreement procedure (MAP) as a preferred Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) transfer pricing dispute resolution mechanism. The research used a qualitative legal review of existing literature in the selected regimes by comparing the domestic tax law framework in these countries. Transfer pricing manipulation is a significant source of illicit financial flows of capital as identified in the research by Global Financial Integrity on Africa, which drew from Ghana, Kenya and Uganda as case studies. South Africa and Kenya are considered as the gateways to Africa with many multinational enterprises (MNEs) taking residence in them before expanding to the rest of Africa. The article focuses specifically on a number of guidelines that should be in place for the effective use of the MAP in the resolution of tax treaty disputes. It also demonstrates how the absence of guidelines, or the lack of clarity thereof, discourages both taxpayers and revenue authorities from effectively using the MAP to resolve transfer pricing disputes. The absence of guidelines has resulted in many aggrieved taxpayers opting to approach the courts as opposed to using the MAP as a mechanism to resolve tax treaty disputes. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of how resolved transfer pricing disputes eliminates double taxation. The article recommends that the same benefits enjoyed under the domestic dispute resolution process be incorporated into the MAP. It also makes recommendations on how jurisdictions with a low tax treaty network can address this challenge to enable them to effectively use the MAP as a tax treaty dispute resolution.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

African Monitor, ‘Report 1, State of Illicit Financial Flows in South Africa – A Scoping Exercise’ accessed 1 July 2024.

Asante-Boadi Y, ‘Transfer Pricing – Ghana’ (News & Press: Tax Talk, 4 March 2011) <https://www.thesait.org.za/news/101872/Transfer-Pricing---Ghana.htm> accessed 18 January 2024.

Al-Rawashdeh B, ‘Mutual Agreement Procedure, Double Taxation Treaties and Protection of Taxpayers’ Rights in the BRICS Countries’ (The Lawyer Quarterly, 7 September 2020) <https://tlq.ilaw.cas.cz/index.php/tlq/article/view/413> accessed 18 January 2024.

Bokobo S, Govind S, Pimentel C, Roller N and Turcan l, with additional contributions from Dimitropoulou C, de Goede J, Owens J, Pasztor J, de la Rey J and Saksena P, ‘Tax Treaty Mechanisms to Resolve Cross Border Tax Disputes, Chapter 5: The Mutual Agreement Procedure’ (2018) <https://www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-content/uploads> accessed 1 November 2022.

Davis Tax Committee (DTC), ‘Second Interim Report on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) in South Africa. Summary of DTC Report on Action 14: Make Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective’ <https://www.taxcom.org.za/docs/New_Folder3/13%20BEPS%20Final%20Report%20-%20Action%2014.pdf> accessed 27 August 2022.

Els M, ‘Transfer Pricing Disputes on the Rise’ (Deloitte, 2017) <https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/za/Documents/tax/za_Transfer_Pricing_Disputes_on_the_Rise.pdf> accessed 17 September 2022.

Ernst & Young, ‘Global Tax Alert, News from Transfer Pricing, Ghana Commences Transfer Pricing Audits – Ghana Revenue Authority Reveals That over 250 Transfer Pricing Audits Have Been Initiated’ (16 February 2015) <https://www.ey.com/gl/en/services/tax/international-tax/alert--Ghana-commences-transfer-pricing-audits---ghana-revenue-authority-reveals-that-over-250-transfer-pricing-audits-have-been-initiated> accessed 30 January 2022.

Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA), ‘Double Taxation Agreements’

<https://gra.gov.gh/double-taxation-agreements/> accessed 10 June 2022.

Haase J, Grimm N and Versfeld E, International Commercial Law from a South African Perspective (Shaker 2003).

Harms L and Van der Zwan P, ‘Alternatives for the Treatment of Transfer Pricing Adjustments in South Africa’ (2016) 49(2) De Jure. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2016/v49n2a6

Hofbauer I, ‘Settlement of Tax Disputes in Austrian Tax Treaty Law’ in M Lang and M Zuger (eds), Settlement of Tax Disputes in Tax Treaty Law (Kluwer Law International 2003).

International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation (IBFD), ‘The Role and Importance of Transfer Pricing in International Tax Planning’ (n.d.) <https://www.ibfd.org/shop/training/role-and-importance-transfer-pricing-international-tax-planning> accessed 7 March 2024.

Internet Public Library, ‘Advantages and Disadvantages of Transfer Mispricing’ (n.d.) <https://www.ipl.org/essay/Advantages-And-Disadvantages-Of-Transfer-Mispricing-PCHFRXAWU> accessed 26 February 2022.

Johannes B, ‘Pay Now, Argue Later’ Principle: When Must You Pay SARS?’ (News & Press: Tax Talk, 2016) <https://www.thesait.org.za/news> accessed 3 September 2022.

Kakembo D, ‘EA Community Treaty in the Offing’ (The Observer, 2011) <https://www.observer.ug> accessed 1 November 2022.

Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA), ‘Treaties and International Policy’ (August 2021) <https://www.kra.go.ke/about-kra-footer/treaties-international-policy> accessed 25 September 2022.

Ladu I, ‘Tax Appeals Tribunal: Is It an Enabler or Barrier to Business’ (Monitor, 10 April 2018) <https://www.monitor.co.ug> accessed 16 June 2021.

Maina G and Ikiara M, ‘Tax Dispute Resolution in Kenya’ (Rödl & Partner, 27 March 2018) <https://www.roedl.com/insights/tax-dispute-resolution-kenya-kra> accessed 7 September 2019.

Mansori K and Weichenrieder A, ‘Tax Competition and Transfer Pricing Disputes’ (2001) 58(1) Public Finance Analysis <https://doi.org/10.1628/0015221022905759> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1628/0015221022905759

Markham M, ‘International Tax Treaty Arbitration – Fighting an Uphill Battle in the Global Arena’ (2017) 28 Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal.

Markham M, ‘New Developments in Dispute Resolution in International Tax’ (2017) 25(1) Revenue Law Journal <https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6753> DOI: https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6753

Nicolson G, ‘Fighting Africa’s Illicit Financial Flows: A 14-Step Guide Revealed’ (Daily Maverick, 9 January 2017) <https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2017-01-29-fighting-africas-illicit-financial-flows-a-14-step-guide-revealed> accessed 17 September 2022.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), ‘Manual on Effective Mutual Agreement Procedures (MEMAP)’ (n.d.) <https://www.oecd.org/tax/dispute/manualoneffectivemutualagreementproceduresmemap.htm> accessed 4 November 2022.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), ‘Commentary on Article 25 of the Model Tax Convention’ (2010) <https://www.oecd.org/berlin/publikationen/43324465.pdf> accessed 20 July 2022.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OCED), ‘Making Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective, Action 14: 2015 Final Report’ (2015) <https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/making-dispute-resolution-mechanisms-more-effective-action-14-2015-final-report-9789264241633-en.htm> accessed 22 September 2022.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), ‘Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, South Africa (Stage 2): Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 14’ (2022) <https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/bdae3e57-en.pdf?expires=1663859955&id=id&accname=oid044961&checksum=7157BC85E948920CEE7E8F818147240F> accessed 22 September 2022.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), ‘Making Dispute Resolution More Effective – MAP Peer Review Report, South Africa (Stage 2): Inclusive Framework on BEPS: Action 14’ (2021) <https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/bdae3e57en.pdf?expires=1663859955&id=id&accname=oid044961&checksum=7157BC85E948920CEE7E8F818147240F> accessed 22 September 2022.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), ‘Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital 2017’ (2017) <https://www.oecd.org/ctp/model-tax-convention-on-income-and-on-capital-full-version-9a5b369e-en.htm> accessed 7 March 2024.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), ‘Mutual Agreement Procedure Statistics per Jurisdiction for 2020’ (2020) <https://www.oecd.org/tax/dispute/2020-map-statistics-kenya.pdf> accessed 25 September 2022.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), ‘Mutual Agreement Procedure Statistics’ (2020) <http://www.oecd.org/tax/dispute/mutual-agreement-procedure-statistics.htm> accessed 4 September 2022.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), ‘South Africa Dispute Resolution Profile’ (14 December 2021) <https://www.oecd.org/tax/dispute/south-africa-dispute-resolution-profile.pdf> accessed 23 September 2022.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), ‘Kenya Dispute Resolution Profile – Preventing Dispute’ (June 2022) <https://www.oecd.org/tax/dispute/Kenya-Dispute-Resolution-Profile.pdf> accessed 21 May 2023.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), ‘Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters’ (July 2022) <https://www.oecd.org/ctp/exchange-of-tax-information/convention-on-mutual-administrative-assistance-in-tax-matters.htm> accessed 2 November 2022.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), ‘Signatories and Parties to the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Status as of 21 February 2023’ (2023) <https://www.oecd.org/tax/treaties/beps-mli-signatories-and-parties.pdf> accessed 4 March 2023.

OECD/G20, ‘Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project’ (2013) OECD/G20, ‘Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project’ (2013) <https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/taxation/oecd-g20-base-erosion-and-profit-shifting-project_23132612> accessed 18 September 2022.

Oguttu AW, ‘Tax Disputes in Uganda’ in E Baistocchi (ed), A Global Analysis of Tax Treaty Disputes (Cambridge University Press 2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316528945.027

Pak S, Zanakis S and Zdanowicz J, ‘Detecting Abnormal Pricing in International Trade: The Greece-USA Case’ (2003) 33(2) Interfaces <https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.33.2.54.14473> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.33.2.54.14473

PWC, ‘Uganda, Individual – Tax Relief and Foreign Treaties’ (PWC, September 2022) <https://taxsummaries.pwc.com/Uganda/Individual/Foreign-tax-relief-and-tax-treaties> accessed 1 November 2022.

Rasmussen M, International Double Taxation (Kluwer Law International 2011).

Republic of Ghana, ‘Ghana’s Double Taxation Treaty Administration Manual (Draft)’ <https://qrfy.com/api/storage/gcs/pdf/qrfyprod/38155720-9510-49ed-84d3-9fa35f1ce0e5.pdf> accessed 4 March 2023.

Rhohatgi R, Basic International Taxation (2nd edn, Richmond 2005).

South African Revenue Service (SARS), ‘Guide on Mutual Agreement Procedures’, Issue 3 (March 2020) <https://www.sars.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/Ops/Guides/LAPD-IT-G24-Guide-on-Mutual-Agreement-Procedures> accessed 13 August 2022.

Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, ‘Tax Appeals Tribunal’ <https://www.finance.go.ug/mofped/tax-appeals-tribunal-tat> accessed 14 March 2024.

United Nations (UN), ‘Guide to the Mutual Agreement Procedure under Tax Treaties’ (2012) <https://www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ta-Guide_MAP.pdf> accessed 4 March 2023.

United Nations (UN), ‘UN Manual on Transfer Pricing, Managing the Transfer Pricing Function in a Multinational Enterprise’ (TP-G, 2017) <https://tpguidelines.com/a-4-managing-the-transfer-pricing-function-in-a-multinational-enterprise> accessed 17 September 2022.

United Nations. Economic Commission for Africa (UN.ECA), ‘Illicit Financial Flows: Report of the High Level Panel on Illicit Financial Flows from Africa’ (2015) <https://hdl.handle.net/10855/22695> accessed 4 March 2023.

Waris A, ‘How Kenya Has Implemented and Adjusted to the Changes in International Transfer Pricing Regulations: 1920–2016’, ICTD Working Paper 69 <https://www.ictd.ac/publication/how-kenya-has-implemented-and-adjusted-to-the-changes-in-international-transfer-pricing-regulations-1920-2016/> accessed 14 March 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3120551

Cases

Beiersdorf Ghana Limited v/s the Commissioner General of the Ghana Revenue Authority (CM/TAX/0001/2018).

Heritage Oil Plc, and Tullow Oil Plc [2013] 2175 (unreported).

Metcash Trading Ltd v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service 2000 62 SATC 84 at 85.

Unilever Kenya Ltd v Commissioner of Income Tax (2005) eKLR (Income Tax Appeal No 753 of 2003).

Legislation

Ghana

Income Tax Act 896 of 2015.

Kenya

Income Tax Act, CAP 40 Revised Edition 2022.

South Africa

Tax Administration Act 28 of 2011.

Uganda

Income Tax (Transfer Pricing) Regulations.

Double Tax Agreements

Agreement between the Republic of Singapore and the Republic of Ghana for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income <https://www.iras.gov.sg/media/docs/default-source/dtas/singapore-ghana-dta-(ratified)(12-apr-2019).pdf?sfvrsn=3adbaa8f_0> Entry into force 12 April 2019.

DTA between the Government of Kenya and the Government of the Republic of the United Kingdom of Great Britain <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7f9d8a40f0b6230269090e/uk-kenya-dta-consolidated_-_in_force.pdf> Entry into force 30 September 1977.

DTA between the Government of the Republic of Uganda and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and the Government of the Republic of Northern Ireland for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital Gains <https://www.ura.go.ug/Resources/webuploads/INLB/Double%20Taxation%20Agreement%20Uganda%20United%20Kindgdom%20Income%20Tax%20Treaty.pdf> accessed 5 July 2022. Entry into force 21 December 1993.

DTA between Ireland and the Republic of Ghana for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion <https://www.revenue.ie/en/tax-professionals/documents/double-taxation-treaties/g/ghana.pdf> Signed 7 February 2018.

DTA between the Kingdom of Denmark and the Republic of Ghana for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital Gains <https://gra.gov.gh/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Ghana_Denmark-DTA.pdf>

DTAs between South Africa and Uganda, Botswana, Namibia, Ghana and Kenya <https://www.sars.gov.za/Legal/International-Treaties-Agreements/DTA-Protocols/Pages/default.aspx> accessed 8 May 2022. Signed 20 March 2014.