Foetal Burial Right Provisions in South African Law: Addressing Ambiguities Through a Comparative Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-3062/16682Keywords:
Births and Deaths Registration Act, pregnancy loss, foetal burial right, foetal remains, miscarriage, termination of pregnancyAbstract
The South African Births and Deaths Registration Act (BADRA) clearly accommodated the use of burial as a means of disposing of foetal remains emanating from stillbirths while denying parents who suffered from other forms of pregnancy loss the same right. However, the recent order by the South African Constitutional Court (CC) in the case of the Voice of the Unborn Baby NPC has revealed that BADRA does not stand in the way of bereaved parents who would elect burial as a means of disposing of the foetal remains of their lost pregnancies when the dead foetus has not attained the stipulated age of a stillborn. As a consequence, the CC judgment pointed out the fact that BADRA has been misinterpreted in practice. This study is conducted to investigate the provisions of some jurisdictions on the subject of foetal burial and compare them with those of South Africa, with the aim of addressing the ambiguity in the latter legislative document using a doctrinal legal approach. It is found that many of the selected jurisdictions not only have provisions relating to the disposal of foetal remains emanating from stillbirth but also spell out explicitly provisions on the disposal of dead foetuses arising from miscarriages and pregnancy terminations. The study concludes by recommending that the South African legislation be revised to accommodate the needs of all prospective parents who may suffer the loss of pregnancy.
References
Catholic Health Association of Canada, Health Ethics Guide (Catholic Health Association of Canada 2000).
Devenish G, The South African Constitution (3rd edn, LexisNexis Butterworths 2005).
Du Toit-Prinsloo L, Pickles C and Saayman G, ‘Managing the Remains of Foetuses and Abandoned Infants: A Call to Urgently Review South African Law and Medicolegal Practice’ (2016) 106(6) South African Medical Journal <https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i6.10598> DOI: https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i6.10598
Finn C, ‘Nine TDs Want Law to Ensure Aborted Foetuses Are Buried or Cremated’ (theJournal.ie, 21 November 2018) <https://www.thejournal.ie/abortion-law-burial-foetus-4319054-Nov2018/> accessed 21 May 2020.
Government of Western Australia, Department of Health, Guideline for the Release of a Human Foetus or Placenta (2020) accessed 13 October 2019.
Health Professions Council of South Africa, Guidelines for the Management of Health Care Waste, Booklet 16 (2008) <http://www.hpcsa.co.za> accessed 13 September 2021.
Key EK, ‘The Forced Choice of Dignified Disposal: Government Mandate of Internment or Cremation of Fetal Remains’ (2017) 51 UC Davis L Rev.
Kurtzleben D, ‘Planned Parenthood Investigations Find No Fetal Tissue Sale’ (NPR, 28 January 2016) <https://www.npr.org/2016/01/28/464594826/in-wake-of-videos-planned-parenthood-investigations-find-no-fetal-tissue-sales>
Layne LL, Motherhood Lost: A Feminist Account of Pregnancy Loss (Routledge 2003).
Law Library of Congress, ‘The Impact of Foreign Law on Domestic Judgement’ <https://www.loc.gov/law/help/domestic-judgment/impact-of-foreign-law.pdf> accessed 19 April 2020.
Lollini A, ‘Legal Argumentation Based on Foreign Law: An Example from Case Law of the South African Constitutional Court’ (2007) 3 Utrecht L Rev. <https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.37> DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.37
Marsh T, ‘Mandatory Funerals for Fetal Remains: “Politics and Dealing with Reality Are Two Different Things”’ (Funeral Law Blog, 2016) <https://funerallaw.typepad.com/blog/2016/10/mandatory-funerals-for-fetal-remains-politics-and-dealing-with-reality-are-two-different-things.html>
MedlinePlus, ‘Miscarriage’ (US National Library of Medicine) <https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/001488.htm> accessed 21 March 2021.
New South Wales Health, Maternity – Management of Early Pregnancy Complications (2002) s 5.
Ngubane S, ‘Death and Burial Practices in Contemporary Zulu Culture, South Africa’ in Seling H and Rakoff RM (eds), Death across cultures, Science across Cultures: The History of Non-Western Science (Springer, Cham 2019) 9. <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18826-9_8> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18826-9_8
Queensland Health, Queensland Clinical Guidelines: Early Pregnancy Loss (2017) <https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0033/139947/g-epl.pdf> accessed 2 April 2020.
Republic of South Africa, Environment Conservation Act 73 of 1989, Government Gazette (1989) <http://www.acts.co.za/environment-conservation-act-1989/> accessed 18 May 2021.
Slabbert M, ‘Pregnancy Loss: A Burial or Medical Waste’ (2017) 80 THRHR.
Taitz JT and Clow S, ‘Effect of the Legislative Definition of the Terms “Stillborn” and “Viable”’ (1988) 73(4) South African Medical Journal.
Venter HM, ‘The Difference Between a Stillborn Baby and a Medical Waste Foetus in Light of the Current South African Law’ (PhD thesis, University of Pretoria 2018).
Ville JR de, Constitutional and Statutory Interpretation (Interdoc Consultants Pty Ltd 2000).
Zavis A, ‘The Latest Battlefront in the Abortion Wars: Some States Want to Require Burial or Cremation for Fetuses’ LA Times (5 February 2017) <http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-aborted-fetus-burial-2017-story.html> accessed 5 August 2020.
Cases
S v Molefe 2012 (2) SACR 574 (GNP) 578.
S v Mshumpa 2008 1 SACR 126 (E).
S v Makwanyane and Another (CCT3/94) [1995] ZACC 3; 1995 (3) SA 391 (CC); 1995 (6) BCLR 665 (CC).
S v Williams and Others (CCT20/94) [1995] ZACC 6; 1995 (3) SA 632 (CC); 1995 (7) BCLR 861 (CC).
National Legislation
Births and Deaths Registration Act 51 of 1992.
Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 92 of 1996.
Constitution of the Republic of South African Constitution, 1996.
Environment Conservation Act 73 of 1989.
Gauteng Health Care Waste Management Regulations 2003.
National Health Act 61 of 2003: Regulations Relating to the Management of Human Remains (GN R363 in GG 36473 of 22 May 2013).
Regulations Relating to the Management of Human Remains (GN R363 in GG 36473 of 22 May 2013), issued under the National Health Act 61 of 2003.
South African National Standard Act 8 of 2008.
Foreign Legislation
Canada, Consolidation of Vital Statistics Act R.S.N.W.T. 1988, c.V-3 (2016).
Criminal Code Act (1916) Cap. (C38) Laws of the Federation of Nigeria (2004).
Florida Statutes S 383.33625 (2016).
Government of Western Australia, Department of Health, Guideline for the Release of a Human Foetus or Placenta (2020).
Human Tissue Authority, Guidance on the Disposal of Pregnancy Remains Following Pregnancy Loss or Termination (2004).
India, Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1969.
Indiana Code S. 16-34-3-4 (2016). <https://doi.org/10.5840/santayana201634344>
Kansas Statutes S. 65-67a10 (2014).
Michigan Compiled Laws S. 333.2854 (2014).
Minnesota Statutes S. 145.1621-1622 (2016). <https://doi.org/10.1007/s40278-016-21698-x>
Missouri Revised Statutes S. 194 (2012).
Nebraska Code S. 71-20,121 (2014). <https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2014.890435>
New South Wales Health, Maternity – Management of Early Pregnancy Complications (2002).
New Zealand, Human Tissue Act 2008.
Nigeria, Births, Deaths, etc. (Compulsory Registration) Act No 69 of 1992.
Nigeria, Penal Code Act 1959 (Laws of Northern Nigeria).
Ohio Revised Code S. 759.49 (2017)
Queensland Health, Queensland Clinical Guidelines on Early Pregnancy Loss (2022).
Republic of Ireland, Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy) Act 2018.
Sierra Leone, Births and Death Registration Act 1983.
South Australia, Burial and Cremation Act 2013.
South Dakota Codified Laws (2017).
Tasmania, Burial and Cremation Bill 2019.
Tennessee Code Annotated, S. 68-3-506 (2016).
The Bahamas, Births and Deaths Registration Act (Ch 188) (2006).
The Bahamas, Penal Code (Ch 84) (1924).
West Virginia Code, ch 16, Public Health (2005).
Zimbabwe, Burial and Cremation Act 1962.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
© Published by the Department of Public, Constitutional and International Law, University of South Africa and Unisa Press.
