The South African Constitutional Court Judgment Concerning the Suspension of SADC Tribunal: Critiquing the Critics of the Constitutional Court

Mkhululi Nyathi; Moses Retselitsitsoe Phooko

doi:10.25159/2522-3062/9506

Authors

Mkhululi Nyathi University of the Witwatersrand https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5608-6024
Moses Retselitsitsoe Phooko University of Johannesburg https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3929-8671

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-3062/9506

Keywords:

SADC Tribunal, SADC Summit, South African Constitutional Court, International Law, Access to Justice

Abstract

This article discusses the various scholarly critiques of the South African Constitutional Court judgment in Law Society of South Africa & Others v President of the Republic of South Africa & Others. While we discuss and analyse the articles by some of the scholars who have critiqued the decision, we pay more attention to the criticism by Tladi in particular. We point out that Tladi failed to properly locate the main basis of the Constitutional Court’s decision. We also disagree with Tladi’s assertion that the SADC Treaty and the 2000 Tribunal Protocol could be amended through any means other than the three-quarters majority of the SADC Summit as required by the SADC Treaty. Further, we disagree with Tladi’s view that the doctrine of subsequent practice is applicable in this case and that it was correctly applied in the adoption of the 2014 Tribunal Protocol.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bates S, ‘Law Society of South Africa & Others v President of the Republic of South Africa & Others 2019 (3) (CC) Constitutional Court of South Africa, December 11, 2018’ (2020) 114(2) American Journal of International Law <https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2020.20> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2020.20

Coutsoudis A and Du Plessis M, ‘We are All International Lawyers: Now What? Taking Seriously the Constitutional Injunction to Integrate International Law Obligations into South African Law’ (2020) 10 Constitutional Court Review <https://doi.org/10.2989/CCR.2020.0007> DOI: https://doi.org/10.2989/CCR.2020.0007

Coutsoudis A and Du Plessis, M, ‘We Are All International Lawyers Now: the Constitution’s International Law Trifecta Comes of Age’ (2010) 136(3) South African Law Journal.

Klabbers J, An Introduction to Institutional Law (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2009) <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801013>.

Nathan L, ‘The Disbanding of the SADC Tribunal: A Cautionary Tale’ (2013) 35(4) Human Rights Quarterly <https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2013.0059> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2013.0059

Nyathi M, The Southern African Development Community and Law (Palgrave Macmillan 2019) <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76511-2> DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76511-2

Nyathi M, ‘Supreme in Letter, Supreme in Spirit, Supreme in Deed: An Exposition of the SADC Summit’s Overarching Powers in the SADC Integration Project’ (2017) 31(2) Speculum Juris.

Osode P, ‘The Southern African Development Community in Legal Historical Perspective’ (2003) 28 (3) Journal for Juridical Science <https://doi.org/10.4314/jjs.v28i3.27147> DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/jjs.v28i3.27147

Phooko M, ‘Revisiting the Monism and Dualism Dichotomy: What does the South African Constitution of 1996 and the Practice by the Courts Tell Us About the Reception of SADC Community Law (Treaty law) in South Africa?’ (2021) 29(1) African Journal of International and Comparative Law <https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2021.0356> DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2021.0356

Phooko M, ‘A Call for Public Participation in the Treaty-making Process in South Africa: What can South Africa Learn from the Kingdom of Thailand?’ (2020) 53 (1) Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa <https://doi.org/10.25159/0010-4051/6029> DOI: https://doi.org/10.25159/0010-4051/6029

Phooko M, ‘Has the SADC Tribunal been Salvaged by the South African Constitutional Court and the Tanzanian High Court?’ (2020) 34(2) Speculum Juris.

Phooko M and Nyathi M, ‘The Revival of the SADC Tribunal by South African Courts: A Contextual Analysis of the Decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa’ (2019) 52(1) De Jure <https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2019/v52a21> DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2019/v52a21

Swanepoel N, ‘The “Warm Welcome by South Africa of the Stealthy Introduction of Impunified Disregard for and Violation of Fundamental Rights”: A Legal-Political Commentary on the SADC Tribunal Jurisprudence in South Africa’ (2020) 52(1) Acta Academica <https://doi.org/10.18820/24150479/aa52i1/4> DOI: https://doi.org/10.18820/24150479/aa52i1/4

Samtani S, ‘International Law, Access to Courts and Non-retrogression: Law Society v President of the Republic of South Africa’ (2020) 10 Constitutional Court Review <https://doi.org/10.2989/CCR.2020.0008> DOI: https://doi.org/10.2989/CCR.2020.0008

Tladi D, ‘The Constitutional Court’s Judgment in the SADC Tribunal Case: International Law Continues to Befuddle’ (2020) 10 Constitutional Court Review <https://doi.org/10.2989/CCR.2020.0006> DOI: https://doi.org/10.2989/CCR.2020.0006