“In This Place, at This Time”: Staging Female Bodies and Representing Reconciliation in Post-Apartheid South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/2412-8457/19201Keywords:
transmodal adaptation, performativity, rape, Truth and Reconciliation Commission, dialogismAbstract
- M. Coetzee, Craig Higginson, and Mike van Graan make use of transmodal interactions between the narrative mode of the novel and the theatrical idiom in several of their works, an interplay which inflects the representation of rape, as it foregrounds it, in the context of the enduring legacy of both apartheid and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). Using close reading to show how this interplay between literary modes (drama and narrative) highlights their respective characteristics in representing women’s bodies and giving voice to their stories, this article will argue that such transmodal writing further allows for a singular experience (Attridge) of the works, which better makes heard the singular voice of women, as they too often remain the victims of what Pumla Dineo Gqola has shown to be a national nightmare in South Africa. It shall be seen that these works call on an active and fully embodied engagement with the texts: Their use of theatricality as enmeshed with narration calls for a reflection on the processes and notions of confession and testimony, also at the heart of the TRC, to disentangle the truth from fiction or lies. Ultimately, the authors, in their own literary practices, might be said to ask readers and viewers to “do” something to end rape (Gqola).
References
Attridge, Derek. 2004a. J. M. Coetzee and the Ethics of Reading. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226818771.001.0001.
Attridge, Derek. 2004b. The Singularity of Literature. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203420447.
Attwell, David. 2001. “‘Coetzee and Post-Apartheid South Africa’, A Review of J. M. Coetzee’s Disgrace.” Journal of Southern African Studies 27 (4): 865–867.
Butler, Judith. 2003. Giving an Account of Oneself: A Critique of Ethical Violence. Assen: Van Gorcum.
Coetzee, J. M. 1992. Doubling the Point: Essays and Interviews. Edited by David Attwell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Coetzee, J. M. (1999) 2000. Disgrace. London: Vintage.
Effe, Alexandra. 2017. J. M. Coetzee and the Ethics of Narrative Transgression: A Reconsideration of Metalepsis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60101-4.
Fensham, Rachel. 2009. To Watch Theatre: Essays on Genre and Corporeality. New York: Peter Lang.
Forster, E. M. 1924. A Passage to India. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Foster, Don, Paul Haupt, and Marésa de Beer. 2005. The Theatre of Violence: Narratives of Protagonists in the South African Conflict. Cape Town: Institute for Justice and Reconciliation.
Genette, Gérard. 1972. Figures III. Paris: Seuil.
Genette, Gérard. 1982. Palimpsestes: L’écriture au second degré. Paris: Seuil.
Genette, Gérard, and Tzvetan Todorov. 1986. Théorie des genres. Paris: Seuil.
Gqola, Pumla Dineo. 2015. Rape: A South African Nightmare. Johannesburg: Jacana Media.
Graham, Lucy Valerie. 2012. State of Peril: Race and Rape in South African Literature. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199796373.001.0001.
Graham, Shane. 2009. South African Literature After the Truth Commission: Mapping Loss. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230620971.
Hénin, Emmanuelle. 2008. “Faut-il ensanglanter la scène ? Les enjeux d’une controverse classique.” Littératures classiques 67 (3): 13–32. https://doi.org/10.3917/licla.067.0013.
Heyns, Michiel. 2000. “The Whole Country’s Truth: Confession and Narrative in Recent White South African Writing.” Modern Fiction Studies 46 (1): 42–66. https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2000.0005.
Higginson, Craig. 2010. Dream of the Dog. London: Oberon.
Higginson, Craig. 2015. The Dream House. Johannesburg: Picador Africa.
Homann, Greg. 2020. “On Black and White: Staging South African Identities after Apartheid.” In Forays into Contemporary South African Theatre: Devising New Stage Idioms, edited by Marc Maufort and Jessica Maufort, 23–42. Leiden: Brill, Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004414464_003.
Kossew, Sue, and Melissa Harvey. 2019. Reading Coetzee’s Women. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19777-3.
Krog, Antjie. (1998) 1999. Country of My Skull. London: Vintage.
Meersman, Brent. 2015. “Mike van Graan.” In The Methuen Drama Guide to Contemporary South African Theatre, edited by Martin Middeke, Peter Paul Schneider, and Greg Homann, 209–225. London: Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781408176689.ch-012.
Oboe, Annalisa. 2007. “The TRC Women’s Hearings as Performance and Protest in the New South Africa.ˮ Research in African Literatures 28 (3): 60–76. https://doi.org/10.2979/RAL.2007.38.3.60.
Rogez, Mathilde. 2020. “From the Stage to the Page: Trauma, Reconciliation and Remembering in Craig Higginson’s Dream of the Dog and The Dream House.” In Forays into Contemporary South African Theatre: Devising New Stage Idioms, edited by Marc Maufort and Jessica Maufort, 121–141. Leiden: Brill, Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004414464_009.
Sanders, Mark. 2007. Ambiguities of Witnessing: Law and Literature in the Time of a Truth Commission. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Schwanecke, Christine. 2022. A Narratology of Drama: Dramatic Storytelling in Theory, History, and Culture from the Renaissance to the Twenty-First Century. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110724110.
Snyckers, Fiona. 2019. Lacuna. Johannesburg: Picador Africa.
TRC (Truth and Reconciliation Commission). 1998. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report. Cape Town: TRC. Accessed February 27, 2025. http://www.justice.gov.za/trc/report/.
Van Graan, Mike. (2004) 2010. Green Man Flashing. Cape Town: Junkets Publishing.
Watchel, Eleanor. 2001. “The Sympathetic Imagination: A Conversation with J. M. Coetzee.” Brick 56: 37–47.
Winkler, Rafael. 2017. “Who Has Authority to Talk About Identity?” Mail & Guardian, February 7. Accessed February 27, 2025. https://mg.co.za/article/2017-02-07-00-who-has-authority-to-talk-about-identity/.