THE ATTITUDE OF OHADA LAW COUNTRIES TOWARDS THE CISG

Authors

  • Aristide Kahindo Nguru

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-9515/1090

Keywords:

business law harmonisation, CISG, Commercial Uniform Act, OHADA law, uniform sales law

Abstract

Disparities in national laws are likely to result in uncertainty which, in turn, creates obstacles to international commerce. It is acknowledged that strong investment flows cannot be achieved without a secure legal and commercial environment. Mindful of such a need, states decided to harmonise sales law internationally. To this end, in 1980 they adopted the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods known as the Vienna Sales Convention or the CISG. The CISG has led a number of countries, including the Organisation for the Harmonisation of Business Law in Africa (OHADA) law states, to modernise their local sales law. However, only three of 17 countries that constitute the OHADA community have ratified the CISG. OHADA law countries give the impression of favouring a more regional approach to the unification of sales law rather than the CISG’s global approach by implementing a local Commercial Uniform Act. Their indifference towards the CISG is not without consequences for commerce in the OHADA region. This article seeks to demonstrate that the lack of ratification of a universal convention, as for example the CISG, poses a danger to commercial dealings. It also intends to show that the CISG is not hostile to regional uniform sales laws of the OHADA Commercial Uniform Act type. It concludes that OHADA countries do not need to be afraid of their acceptance of the CISG and recommends that it be ratified.

References

Bonell, MJ. 2010. The CISG, European contract law, and the development of a world contract law. Available at <http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/bonell4.html> (accessed 20 March 2014).

Brunner, C. 2013. Contrat de vente soumis à la CVIM. In S Marchand, C Chappuis & L Hirsch (eds) Recueil de Contrats Commerciaux: Modèles en Français et en Anglais Commentés Selon le Droit Suisse. Bâle: Helbing Lichtenhahn.

Butler, A. 2006. A Practical Guide to the CISG: Negotiations through Litigation. New York: ASPEN Publishers.

Castellani, LG. 2008. Ensuring harmonisation of contract law at regional and global level: The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods and the role of UNCITRAL. Revue de Droit Uniforme 13: 115–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/13.1-2.115

Castellani, LG. 2011. The contribution of UNCITRAL to the harmonization of international sale of goods law besides the CISG. Belgrade Law Review 3: 28–38.

Coetzee, J & De Gama, M. 2006. Harmonisation of sales law: An international and regional perspective. VJ 10: 15–26.

Diallo, M. 2007. La Vente Commerciale en Droit OHADA. Paris: ARNT.

Dickerson, CM. 2005. Harmonizing business laws in Africa: OHADA calls the tune. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 44: 17–73.

Eiselen, S. 1999. Electronic commerce and the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) 1980. EDI Law Review 6: 21–46.

Faria, JAE. 2009. Future directions of legal harmonisation and law reform: Stormy seas or prosperous voyage? Unif L Rev 5–34. Ferrari, F (ed). 2008. The CISG and its Impact on National Legal Systems. Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/14.1-2.5

Ferrari, F. 2012. CISG and OHADA sales law or the relationship between global and regional sales law. In U Magnus (ed) CISG vs Regional Sales Law Unification with Focus on the New Common European Sales Law. Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers.

Fieni, P. 2012. Droit commercial général dans l’espace OHADA: Etude comparative de l’ancien et du nouvel Acte Uniforme. Actualités Juridiques Edition Economique 3: 22–50.

Flechtner, HM (ed). 2009. Honnold’s Uniform Law for International Sales under 1980 United Nations Convention. Austin: Kluwer Law International.

Fontaine, M. 2008. Explanatory note to the preliminary draft OHADA Uniform Act on Contract Law. Unif L Rev 13: 633–662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/13.1-2.613

Hartkamp (ed). 1994. Towards a European Civil Code. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Kritzer, AH & Eiselen, S (eds). 2012. International Contract Manual Vols 4 and 5. West: Thomson Reuters.

Kröll, S, Mistelis, L & Viscasillas, PP (eds). 2011. UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG). München: CH Beck Hart Nomos.

Magnus, U (ed). 2012. CISG vs Regional Sales Law Unification with Focus on the New Common European Sales Law. Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers.

Martor, B, Pilkington, N, Sellers, DS & Thouvenot, S. 2002. Business Law in Africa: OHADA and the Harmonization Process. London: Eversheds.

Montero, E. 2004. La formation du contrat depuis le code civil de 1804: Un régime en mouvement sous une lettre figée. In P Wéry (ed) Le Droit des Obligations Contractuelles et Le Bicentenaire du Code Civil. Brussels: La Charte.

Morrissey, JF & Graves, JM. 2008. International Sales Law and Arbitration – Problems, Cases and Commentary. Austin, TX: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.

Mouloul, A. 2009. Understanding the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Laws in Africa (OHADA). Available at <http://www.ohada.com/fichiers/newsletters/ 1556/ Comprendre-l-Ohada-en.pdf> (accessed 19 March 2014).

OHADA Secretariat. 2011. Uniform Act relating to General Commecial Law. Published with the Collaboration of Feneon. Available at <http://www.jurisint.org/ohada/pres/pres.02. en.html#NA-NII> (accessed 25 March 2014).

Ott, Fr & Matthey, P. 2010. Le Commerce International des Marchandises. Brussels: Bruylant.

Owsia, P (ed). 1994. Formation of Contract – A Comparative Study under English, French, Islamic and Iranian Law. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Perovi, J. 2011. Selected critical issues regarding the sphere of application of the CISG. Belgrade Law Review 3: 181–195.

Quinot, G. 2006. Offer, acceptance and the moment of contract formation. In H MacQueen & R Zimmermann (eds) European Contract Law – Scots and South African Perspectives. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748624256.003.0003

Santos, AP & Toe, JY. 2002. Ohada – Droit Commercial General. Bruxelles: Bruylant.

Schlechtriem, P & Schwenzer, I. 2010. Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schwenzer, I & Hachem, P. 2010. The CISG – A story of worldwide success. Available at (accessed 20 March 2014).

Sollund, M. 2007. The UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods. Article 7(1) – The interpretation of the Convention and the Norwegian approach. Nordic Journal of Commercial Law 1: 1–40.

Tchunkam, JD. 2009. La distinction droit civil – droit commercial à l’épreuve de l’OHADA: Une prospective de droit matériel uniforme. Unif L Rev 14: 57–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/14.1-2.57

Tumnde, MS, Idris, MB, Matipé, JAP, Yakubu, JA & Dickerson, CM. 2009. Unified Business Laws for Africa: Common Law Perspectives on OHADA. London: GMB Publishing.

UNCITRAL. 2012. Digest of Case Law on the United Nations Convention on the International Sale of Goods. New York: United Nations Publications.

Wéry, P. 2012. Book II, ‘Contracts and Other Juridical Acts’, of the draft common frame of reference from a Belgian perspective. In V Sagaert, ME Storme & E Terry (eds) The Draft Common Frame of Reference: National and Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Intersentia.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-12

How to Cite

Nguru, Aristide Kahindo. 2016. “THE ATTITUDE OF OHADA LAW COUNTRIES TOWARDS THE CISG”. Journal of Law, Society and Development 3 (1):99-114. https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-9515/1090.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2016-05-11
Accepted 2016-05-11
Published 2016-09-12