Examining the Requirement of Habitability under the South African Landlord-Tenant Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-9515/17654Keywords:
Constitutional obligations, habitability, landlord-tenant, National Housing Code, Rental Housing Act, Social Housing ActAbstract
There are three rental housing sectors in South Africa, namely the private, the public, and the social sector. The private sector comprises the landlord–tenant relationship between purely private parties. The public sector comprises a rental relationship between low-income tenants and the state as public landlord, and the social sector comprises a rental relationship between lower-income tenants and state-subsidised landlords. Private residential housing is regulated by the Rental Housing Act 50 of 1999 (RHA) and the common law. In terms of the common law, a landlord is obliged to place and maintain the property in a condition that is reasonably fit for the purpose for which it was rented. The RHA is pending an amendment, which will expressly alter the common law and include the requirement of habitability in the landlord-tenant framework. In terms of the Rental Housing Amendment Act 35 of 2014 (RHAA), private-sector landlords will be required to provide tenants with a habitable dwelling and maintain the existing structure of such a dwelling in a habitable condition for the duration of the lease. “Habitability” in the RHAA refers to a dwelling that is safe and suitable to live in and has adequate space, protection from the elements and other threats to health, ensures the physical safety of the tenant, the tenant’s household and visitors, and is structurally sound. The RHAA defines “maintenance” as including such repairs and upkeep as may be required to ensure that a dwelling is in a habitable condition. Conversely, public residential housing does not fall under the ambit of the RHA, but it is regulated under a different framework, the National Housing Code of 2009 (NHC), while social rental housing is regulated under the Social Housing Act 16 of 2008 (SHA). The research problem is that the NHC and SHA are not currently housed under the ambit of the RHA. Accordingly, this article aims to investigate where the NHC and SHA fit into the South African landlord-tenant framework, as regards the requirement of habitability. It is important to explore the concept of habitability so as to paint a coherent, complete picture and delineate the scope of what constitutes habitability in respect of tenants’ rights in all three rental sectors.
References
Bradfield, G. and K. Lehmann. 2013. Principles of the Law of Sale and Lease. Cape Town: Juta.
Currie, I. and J. De Waal. 2013. The Bill of Rights Handbook. Cape Town: Juta.
De Vos, P., W. Freedman, Z. Boggenpoel, L. Draga, C. Gevers, K. Govender, P. Lenaghan, S. Mnisi-Weeks, C.S. Namakula, N. Ntlama, D. Mailula, K. Moyo, S. Sibanda and L. Stone. 2021. South African Constitutional Law in Context. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
Department of Human Settlement. 2009a. A Simplified Guide to the National Housing Code. Pretoria: DHS.
Department of Human Settlement. 2009b. National Housing Code: Community Residential Units Part 3 Vol 6. Pretoria: DHS.
Glover, G. 2014. Kerr’s Law of Sale and Lease. Durban: LexisNexis.
Hershkoff, H. 2008. “Transforming Legal Theory in the Light of Practice: The Judicial Application of Social and Economic Rights to Private Orderings.” In Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World, edited by V. Gauri and D.M. Brinks, 268–302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511240.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511511240.009
Lowenthal, T. 2020. “AB v Pridwin Preparatory School: Progress and Problems in Horizontal Human Rights Law.” South African Journal on Human Rights 36(2–3): 261–274.https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2020.1867484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2020.1867484
Liebenberg, S. 2008. “The Application of Socio-Economic Rights to Private Law.” Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg 2008(3): 464–480.
Liebenberg, S. and R. Kolabhai. 2022. “Private Power, Socio-Economic Transformation, and the Bill of Rights.” In Law, Justice and Transformation, edited by Z Boggenpoel, 245–283. Durban: LexisNexis.
Madlanga, M. 2018. “The Human Rights Duties of Companies and other Private Actors in South Africa.” Stellenbosch Law Review 29(3): 359–378.
Mohamed, SI. 2019. Landlord and Tenant – Rights and Obligations. Durban: LexisNexis.
Muller, G., R. Brits, J.M. Pienaar and Z. Boggenpoel. 2019. Silberberg and Schoeman’s The Law of Property. Durban: LexisNexis.
Muller, G. and S. Viljoen. 2021. Property in Housing. Cape Town: Juta.
Ngwenyama, L.R. 2021. “A Common Standard of Habitability? A Comparison Between Tenants, Usufructuaries and Occupiers in South African Law.” LLD dissertation, Stellenbosch University.
Pieterse, M. 2007. “Indirect Horizontal Application of the Right to Have Access to Health Care Services.” South African Journal on Human Rights 23(1): 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2007.11864913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2007.11864913
Rapelang, T. 2013. “An Evaluation of the Right to Access to Adequate Housing in Joe Morolong Local Municipality, South Africa.” LLM thesis, University of the Free State.
Social Housing Regulatory Authority and Department of Human Settlements. 2009. Norms and Standards for Social Housing. Pretoria: SHRA and DHS.
Sphere Association. 2018. The Sphere Handbook: Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response. London: Practical Action Publishing.
Stoop, P. 2014. “The Law of Lease.” Annual Survey of South African Law. 2014: 804–824.
Viljoen, S. 2016. The Law of Landlord and Tenant. Cape Town: Juta.
Wilson, S. 2021. Human Rights and the Transformation of Property. Cape Town: Juta.
Cases
AB v Pridwin Preparatory School 2020 (5) SA 327 (CC).
Daniels v Scribante 2017 (4) SA 341 (CC). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351179270-11
Fourie NO en ’n Ander v Potgietersrusse Stadsraad 1987 (2) SA 921 (A).
Frenkel & Co v Rand Mines Produce Supply Co 1909 TS 129.
Gateway Properties (Pty) Ltd v Bright Idea Projects 249 CC 2014 (3) All SA 577 (KZP).
Governing Body of the Juma Musjid Primary School v Essay NO (CCT 29/10) [2011] ZACC 13 (11 April 2011).
Government of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom 2001 (1) SA 46 (CC).
Harlin Properties (Pty) Ltd v Los Angeles Hotel (Pty) Ltd 1962 (3) SA 143 (A).
Hunter v Cumnor Investments 1952 (1) SA 735 (C).
Malan v City of Cape Town 2014 (6) SA 315 (CC).
Mpange v Sithole 2007 (6) SA 578 (W).
Pete’s Warehousing & Sales CC v Bowsink Investments CC 2000 (3) SA 833 (E).
Poynton v Cran 1910 AD 205.
Proud Investments (Pty) Ltd v Lanchem Inter (Pty) Ltd 1991 (3) SA 738 (A).
Sarkin v Koren (2) 1949 (3) SA 545 (C). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1949.tb37104.x
Legislation
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa of 1996.
House Act 107 of 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069889700760091
National Housing Code of 2009.
Rental Housing Act 50 of 1999.
Rental Housing Amendment Act 35 of 2014.
Social Housing Act 16 of 2008.
International Instruments
CESCR’s General Comment No 4 (sixth session, 1991) The Right to Adequate Housing (article 11(1) of the ICESCR), UN Doc E/1992/23.
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966 entry into force 3 January 1976, in accordance with article 27.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
