THE PROPAGANDA MODEL AND THE MEDIATION OF THE LAND QUESTION IN ZIMBABWE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/0256-6060/1240Keywords:
propaganda model, mediation, Zimbabwe land reformAbstract
This article critiques the mediation of the Zimbabwean land reform programme in the period 2000–2010 by both the state-controlled and the privately-owned press. Its thrust is to establish the framing patterns that emerge and relate these to Herman and Chomsky’s Propaganda Model. The bold claim by Herman and Chomsky that the media, particularly in the West, pander to the whims of the powerful political and pro-capital elites is explored. Using a qualitative case study approach, data for this study were collected from four Zimbabwean Weeklies, namely The Sunday News and The Sunday Mail, which are stateowned, and The Independent and The Standard, which are privately-owned. News stories on the land reform programme drawn from these weeklies over the 10 year focus period are analysed with the view to ascertaining the tenability of the Propaganda Model. Using the tenets of the Propaganda Model and critical discourse analysis, the study exposes the polemical representations of the land issue by the press. The emerging polemics are attributed to the overbearing influence of ideology, ownership, corporate pro-capital interests and biased source selection. However, the tripartite alliance which the propaganda model claims as existing among government, capitalists and media owners comes unstuck in the Zimbabwean media-scape. There is evidently a fractious relationship between state media and private media in Zimbabwe. The political and economic contestation of power in the nation manifests in the press. It is quite clear from the findings of this study that there is still need for a model that comprehensively attempts to capture the role of the press and its place in Africa.
Metrics
References
Alexander, J. 2007. The Historiography of land in Zimbabwe: Strengths, silences, and questions. The Journal of South African and American Studies 8: 2, 183 – 198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17533170701370992
Butler, J. 2009. Frames of war. When is life grievable? New York: Verso.
Fairclough, N. 1995. Media discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Herman, E.S. and Chomsky, N. 1988. Manufacturing consent: a political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon Books.
Herman S. E. 2000 The Propaganda Model: a retrospective. Journalism Studies, 1: 1, 101 – 112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/146167000361195
Kanyenze, G et al. 2011. Beyond the enclave: towards a pro-poor and inclusive development strategy for Zimbabwe. Harare: Weaver Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvk3gmdw
Klaehn, J. 2003. Behind the invisible curtain of scholarly criticism: revisiting the propaganda model, Journalism Studies, 4:3, 359 – 369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700306487
Klaehn, J. 2009. The Propaganda Model: theoretical and methodological considerations. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 6: 2, 43 – 58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.123
Krieger, N. 1992. Zimbabwe’s guerrilla war: peasant voices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511895869
Lan, D. 1985. Guns and rain: guerrillas and spirit mediums in Zimbabwe. Harare: Zimbabwe Publishing House.
Marongwe, N. 2003. Farm occupations and occupiers in the new politics of land in Zimbabwe. In Zimbabwe’s unifinished business: rethinking land, state and nation in the context of crisis, ed. Hammar, A., Raftopoulos, B.,& Jensen, S. Harare: Weaver Press.
Martin, D. and Johnson, P. 1985. The struggle for Zimbabwe. Harare: Zimbabwe Publishing House.
McChesney, R. W. 2008. The Political Economy of Media: enduring issues, emerging dilemmas. Monthly Review Press. New York.
McQuail, D. 2010. McQuail’s mass communication theory, 6th ed. New Delhi: Sage Publications India.
Mosco, V. 1996. The political economy of communication: rethinking and renewal. London: Sage Publications.
Moyo, S. 2011. Land concentration and accumulation after redistributive reform in post-settler Zimbabwe. Review of African Political Economy 38: 128, 257 – 276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2011.582763
Mtisi, J., Nyakudya, M. and Barnes, T. 2009. War in Rhodesia, 1965-1980. In Becoming Zimbabwe: a history from the pre-colonial period to 2008 ed. Raftopoulos, B. & Mlambo, A. Harare: Weaver Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvk3gmpr.13
Mukasa, D. 2003. Press and Politics in Zimbabwe. African Studies Quartely 7: 2.
Murisa, T. 2011. ‘Lacuna in rural agency: the case of Zimbabwe’s agrarian reforms’. In Land struggles and civil society in Southern Africa ed. Helliker, K. & Murisa, T. Trenton: Africa World Press.
Nhema, A. and Zeleza P.T. 2008. The roots of African conflicts: the causes and costs. Chicago: Ohio University Press.
Thompson, C. B. 1985. Challenge to imperialism: the frontline states in the liberation of Zimbabwe. Harare: Zimbabwe Publishing House.
Reese, S. D. 2007. The Framing Project: a bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication Vol 57, 148-154, International Communication Association. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00334.x
Scoanes, I et al. 2010. Zimbabwe’s land reform: myths & realities. Oxford: James Currey.
Tomaselli K. G. 2003. ‘Media ownership and democratisation. In Media and democracy in Africa ed. G. Hyden, M. Leslie and F. F. Ogundimu. New Brunswick: Transaction Publications.
Rutherford, B. 2012. New Review: Zimbabwe’s Land Reform: myths and realities. Journal of
Contemporary African Studies 30:1 147 – 157.
Van Dijk, T. A. 2001. Critical discourse analysis. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis ed. D.Tannen, D. Schiffrin and H. Hamilton, 352 – 371. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wolmer, W. 2007. From wilderness vision to farm invasions: conservation & development in Zimbabwe’s Southeast Lowveld. Oxford: James Currey.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
