THE DIALOGUE OF THE DEAF: EXPLORING TEXTUAL SILENCE IN STEPHEN CHIFUNYISE'S PLAY, INTIMATE AFFAIRS

Authors

  • Ephraim Vhutuza Department of Film and Theatre Arts Studies Midlands State University Gweru, Zimbabwe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/0256-6060/2172

Keywords:

domestic spaces, silence, intelligent reader, hegemonic actors, patriotic intellectual

Abstract

This article examines Stephen Chifunyise’s calculated focus on the domestic spaces – the family, personal relationships and the psycho-sexual dilemmas at the expense of the wider national socio-economic and political context during a period in Zimbabwe that has come to be known as the “decade of crisis”. Ignoring a plethora of social, economic and political challenges such as the collapse of a welfarist state, unprecedented inflation, political violence,sycophancy and corruption among others, the dramatist chooses to focus solely on the contradictions within the home and the family. The central question with which the article grapples is the ideological motivation behind this deliberate focus by the dramatist. Using Wall’s (1989) theory of the dialogue of the deaf in conjunction with Macherey’s (1978) theory of the “unsaid” in a text, the article argues that despite the author’s calculated omission or silence on the socio-economic and political realities, the average intelligent reader is not only able to read into the dramatist’s ideological position and motive but also the ugly reality that he is trying to cover up or hide from the reader.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Primary source

Chifunyise, S., 2008. Intimate affairs. Harare: Cybercard Trading PL.

Secondary sources

Barthes, R., 1975. The pleasure of the text. New York: Hill and Wang.

Baya, R. and Matsa, L., 2009. Super patriots and morons. Bulawayo: Homegrown Arts Productions.

Cohen, B., 1963. The press and foreign policy production. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Chinweizu, Onsucheka, J. and Madubuike, I., 1980. Toward the decolonisation of African literature. London: KPI.

Connell, B., 2002. Hegemonic masculinity. In: S. Jackson and S. Scott, eds. Gender: A sociological reader. London and New York: Routledge, 60–62.

Delgrado, M. and Svich, C., 2002. Theatre in crisis: Performance manifestos for a new century. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Eagleton, T., 1976. Marxism and literary criticism. London: Methuen.

Gramsci, A., 1971. Selections from the prison notebooks. Edited and translated by Q. Hoare and G. Nowell-Smith. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Grant, D. and Crossan, J., 2012. Freedom to fail: The unintended consequences of a prison drama. Performance Research, 17 (1), 97–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2012.651870

Hammar, A., Raftopoulos, B. and Jensen, S., 2003. Zimbabwe’s unfinished business: Rethinking land, state and nation in the context of crisis. Harare: Weaver Press.

Iser, W., 1974. The implied reader. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

McCombs, E.M., 1993. The evolution of agenda setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication, 43 (2), 58–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01262.x

McCombs, E.M. and Shaw, D., 1972. The agenda setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 176–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/267990

Moyo, M., 2009. Belonging. Harare: Weaver Press.

Muin, M., 2011. Agenda setting theory and the role of the media in shaping public opinion for the Iraq

War. Unpublished MA thesis. Warrensburg, MO: University of Central Missouri.

Ngugi, W., 1981. Decolonizing the mind: The politics of language in African literature. Harare: Zimbabwe Publishing House.

Page, B. and Shapiro, R., 1992. The rational public: Fifty years of trends in American policy preferences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226644806.001.0001

Raftopoulos, B. and Mlambo, A., 2009. The crisis in Zimbabwe, 1998–2008. In: B. Raftopoulos and A. Mlambo, ed. Becoming Zimbabwe: A history from the pre-colonial to 2008. Harare: Weaver Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvk3gmpr.15

Sachikonye, L.M., 2002. Whither Zimbabwe? Crisis or democratisation. Review of African Political Economy, 29 (91), 13–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03056240208704581

Sibenke, B., 1982. My Uncle Grey Bhonzo. Harare: Longman Zimbabwe.

Tendi, B.M., 2008. Patriotic history and public intellectuals critical of power. Journal of South African Studies, 34 (2), 379–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070802038041

Tsodzo, T.K., 1976. The talking calabash. In: T.O. Mcloughlin, ed. New writing in Rhodesia. Gwelo: Mambo Press, 21–35.

Velt-Wild, F., 1993. Teachers, preachers, non-believers: A social history of Zimbabwean literature. Harare: Baobab Books.

Wall, A., 1989. Silence as weapon of authoritarian discourse. In: M. Diaz-Diocaretz, ed. The Bakhtin Circle today. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 211–229.

White, H., 1981. The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. In: W.J. Mitchell, ed. On narrative. Chicago and London: University of Chicago, 1–23.

Zenenga, P., 2008. Censorship, surveillance and the Protest Theater in Zimbabwe. Theatre, 3, 6–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/01610775-2008-006

Zenenga, P., 2010. Hit-and-run theatre: The rise of a new dramatic form in Zimbabwe. Theatre History Studies, 30, 14–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ths.2010.0033

Zuckerman, B., 2008. State-society relations in Zimbabwe: Patterns of continuity and change.

Unpublished draft prepared for the Western Political Science Association Annual Meeting. San Diego, CA.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-17

How to Cite

Vhutuza, Ephraim. 2014. “THE DIALOGUE OF THE DEAF: EXPLORING TEXTUAL SILENCE IN STEPHEN CHIFUNYISE’S PLAY, INTIMATE AFFAIRS”. Latin American Report 30 (1):29-40. https://doi.org/10.25159/0256-6060/2172.

Issue

Section

Articles