PARENTAL REGULATION OF INTERNET USE: ISSUES OF CONTROL, CENSORSHIP AND CYBERBULLYING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/0027-2639/1006Keywords:
internet, adolescent, parenting, control, regulation, cyberbullying, censorshipAbstract
The attraction of the internet continues to grow, mobilising the attention of many users, and impressing especially adolescents globally. Whilst the internet has provided adolescents with many benefits, such as academic support; cross- cultural interactions; social support; and exposure to the world at large, there are serious risks associated with the internet. The parents’ role in this regard becomes pivotal in ensuring the safety of their children. The mechanisms used by parents in controlling their children’s use and access to the internet were the focus of this study. For this reason, the study aimed to determine the role parents play in regulating their adolescent children’s use of and access to the internet and how issues of control, censorship and cyberbullying are addressed. The study was based on Baumrind’s (in Grobman 2008) parenting styles which formed the theoretical framework. A quantitative approach was used to gauge the responses of parents who have adolescent children. Through convenience sampling, the respondents were selected to answer a questionnaire made up of closed-ended questions. The key findings that emerged from the study revealed that parents applied the permissive style of parenting when it came to male adolescents, whilst they applied the authoritative style of parenting to female adolescents.
Metrics
References
Anderson, E. 2015. Teenagers spend 27 hours a week online: How internet use has ballooned in the last decade. The Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/ mediatechnologyandtelecoms/digital-media/11597743/
Beard, K. W. and E. M. Wolf. 2001. Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for internet DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/109493101300210286
addiction. CyberPsychology and Behaviour 4(3): 377–383.
Bryman, A. and E. Bell. 2011. Research methodology: Business management contexts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chen J. V., C. C. Chen and H. H. Yang. 2008. An empirical evaluation of key factors contributing to internet abuse in the workplace. Industrial Management and Data Systems 108(1): 87– DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570810844106
Epslin, K. 2013. The Baumrind Theory of parenting styles. http://www.livestrong.com/
article/1001090-baumrind-theory-parenting-styles/ (accessed February 20, 2016).
EurekAlert. 2015. Is it cyberbullying? Parents’ views differ on how schools should respond. http:// www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2015-09/uomh-iic091615.php (accessed February 21, 2016).
Goldstein, S. E. 2015. Parental regulation of online behaviour and cyber aggression: Adolescents’ experiences and perspectives. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 9(4): Article 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-4-2
Goldstein, S. E., P. E. Davis-Kean and J. S. Eccles. 2005. Parents, peers and problem behaviour: A longitudinal investigation of the impact of relationship perceptions and characteristics on the development of adolescent problem behaviour. Developmental Psychology 41(2): 401–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.2.401
Grobman, K. H. 2008. Prototypical descriptions of 3 parenting styles. http://www.devpsy.org/
teaching/parent/baumrind_styles.html (accessed February 20, 2016).
Hinduja, S. and J. W. Patchin. 2009. Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hinduja, S. and J. W. Patchin. 2014. Cyberbullying fact sheet: Identification, prevention, and response. Cyberbullying Research Center. http://cyberbullying.org/Cyberbullying_ Identification_Prevention_Response.pdf (accessed February 15, 2016).
Kowalski, R. and S. Limber. 2007. Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t23421-000
Adolescent Health 41(6): S22–S30.
Larranaga, M. G., M. A. C. del Rio and G. Martinez. 2015. Parental mediation strategies in Spain: Predicting factors for different strategies. Zer 20(39): 13–27.
Lenhart, A. 2015. Teens, social media and technology overview. http://www.pewinternet. org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/ (accessed February 19, 2016).
Lenhart, A. and M. Madden. 2007. Social networking sites and teens: An overview. Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_SNS_Data_Memo_ Jan_2007.pdf (accessed February 18, 2016).
Lenhart, A., M. Madden and P. Hitlin. 2005. Teens and technology: Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Teens_Tech_ July2005web.pdf (accessed February 15, 2016).
Li, X., D. Li and J. Newman. 2013. Parental behavioral and psychological control and problematic internet use among Chinese adolescents: The mediating role of self-control. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 16(6): 442–447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0293
Liu, W. L., P. Kitchen and A. Moskovos. 2009. Cypriot parental perceptions of children’s internet usage. EuroMed Journal of Business 4(3): 304–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14502190910992710
Livingstone, S. and E. J. Helsper. 2008. Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396
Broadcasting and Electronic Media 52(4): 581–599.
McElhaney, K., J. Allen, J. Stephenson and A. Hare. 2009. Attachment and autonomy during adolescence. In Handbook of adolescent psychology: Vol. 1. Individual bases of adolescent development, ed. R. M. Lerner and L. Steinberg, 358–403. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy001012
Mishna, F., M. Khoury-Kassabri, T. Gadalla and J. Daciuk. 2012 Risk factors for involvement in cyberbullying: Victims, bullies and bully-victims. Child and Youth Services Review 34(1): DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.08.032
–70.
Moreno, M. A., K. G. Egan, K. Bare, H. N. Young and E. D. Cox. 2013. Internet safety education for youth: Stakeholder perspectives. Public Health 13(1): 543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-543
Murdoch, S. J. and H. Roberts. 2013. Introduction to: Internet censorship and control. http://ssrn. com/abstract=2268587 (accessed February 23, 2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2268587
Nieuwboer, C. C., R. G. Fukkink and J. M. A. Hermanns. 2013. Peer and professional parenting support on the internet: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 16(7): 518–528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0547
Patchin, J. and S. Hinduja. 2006. Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 4(2): 148–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006286288
Rice, E. L., R. Petering, H. Rhoades, H. Winetrobe, J. Goldbach, A. Plant, J. Montoya and T.
Kordic. 2015. Cyberbullying perpetration and victimisation among middle school students, research and practice; American Journal of Public Health 105(3): e66–e72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302393
Slonje, R. and P. Smith. 2008. Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00611.x
Journal of Psychology 49(2): 147–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1416081
Slovak, K., H. Crabbs and B. Stryffeler. 2015. Perceptions and experiences of cyberbullying at a faith-based university. Social Work & Christianity, Journal of the North American Association of Christians in Social Work 42(2): 149–164.
Smit, D. M. 2015. Cyberbullying in South African and American schools: A legal comparative study. South African Journal of Education 35(2): 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v35n2a1076
Subrahmanyam, K., R. E. Kraut, P. M. Greenfield and E. F.Gross. 2000. The impact of home
computer use on children’s activities and development. The Future of Children 10(2): 123– DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1602692
Tilton-Weaver, L. C., W. J. Burk, M. Kerr and H. Stattin. 2013. Can parental monitoring and peer management reduce the selection or influence of delinquent peers? Testing the question using a dynamic social network approach. Developmental Psychology 49(11): 2057–2070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031854
Tsitsika, A., M. Janikian, T. M. Schoenmakers, E. C. Tzavela, K. Olafsson, S. Wojcik, G. F. Macarie and C. Tzavara. 2014. Internet addictive behaviour in adolescence: A cross-sectional study in seven European countries. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour and Social Networking 17(8): 528–535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0382
Van den Eijnden, R. J. J. M., R. Spijkerman, A. Vermulst, T. J. van Rooij and R. C. M. E. Engels 2010. Compulsive internet use among adolescents: Bidirectional parent–child relationships. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9347-8
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 38(1): 77–89.
Van der Merwe, P. 2013. South Africa’s adolescents in a wired world. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 2: 348–361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2013.02.33
Williams, K. and N. Guerra. 2007. Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health 41(6): S14–S21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.018
Yang, S. C. and C. J. Tung. 2007. Comparison of internet addicts and non-addicts in Taiwanese high school. Computers in Human Behaviour 23(1): 79–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.037
Yao, M. Z., J. He, D. M. Ko and K. Pang. 2014. The influence of personality, parents behaviours, and self-esteem on internet addiction: A study of Chinese college students. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0710
CyberPyschology, Behaviour and Social Networking 17(2): 04–110.
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., W. Ducat and W. A. Collins. 2011. Autonomy development during adolescence. In Encyclopedia of adolescence, ed. B. B. Brown and M. Prinstein, 66–76. New York: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373951-3.00004-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Accepted 2016-09-30
Published 2016-10-26
