Preparing for the New Phygital Generation as Potential Academic Library Users in South African Higher Education

Authors

  • Brenda Van Wyk The University of Pretoria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-659X/10130

Keywords:

phygital student generation, mobile technology, MLearning, MLIS, critical digital pedagogy, critical librarianship

Abstract

Context: Higher education and its academic support services, including academic library and information services (LIS), have continuously been challenged by new technological developments, as well as the quest for transformation toward more inclusive education. The rapid and disruptive technological changes imposed by the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) heralded a new entry-level student, coined the “phygital generation.” This new generation of library users is characterised by an ever-expanding digital imprint and a preference for using mobile technology to navigate all aspects of their daily lives, including how they approach their tertiary studies.

Focus: The study interrogates the readiness of information specialists to understand the nature of the phygital generation within a higher education group in South Africa. The changes in information-seeking behaviour are explored with due cognisance of the existing digital exclusions experienced by many South African students.

Methodology: Through the lens of the critical theory paradigm and guided by the conceptualisations of post-digital frameworks, critical digital approaches and metacognitive frameworks, qualitative data were collected during a focus group interview. The non-probability sample was purposively selected, consisting of information specialists of a school within a higher education institution. The transcribed data were coded and thematically analysed.

Key findings: Key findings show a shift in the information-seeking behaviour of new entry-level students. There is a propensity towards using mobile technology. It is evident that LIS staff in this study are not yet mobilised to accommodate this new trend by adapting existing services to be more open to accommodating mobile technology seamlessly. The participants reported that academic writing skills are affected by short messaging styles used in social media. Understanding the nature of the new phygital student and capitalising on the affordances of mobile learning will support student success.

Value: Mobile LIS urgently needs to be formalised and implemented strategically with the needs of the new generation in mind. The need for further institutional reform and innovation is evident. Further research is required on plagiarism trends, copyright infringement and privacy compliance that emerged from the findings of this study.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

ACRL. 2015. “Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education.” American Library Association, February 9, 2015.

ACRL. 2020. “Top 20 Trends Affecting Academic Libraries: A Review of the Trends and Issues Affecting Academic Libraries in Higher Education.” ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee 81 (6): 2020. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.81.6.270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.81.6.270

Akabani, O. M., and I. Fourie. 2021. “The Information Source Preferences and Information Monitoring Behaviour of Pregnant Women in Pretoria, South Africa.” IR Information Research 26 (2). https://doi.org/10.47989/irpaper902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47989/irpaper902

Anbu. J. K. P., and S. Kataria. 2017. “Mobile Application for Library Services: Case with Uniswa Library.” International Journal of Information Library and Society 6 (2): 33–42.

Bell, S. 2017. “Leading through VUCA Times.” Library Journal, September 28, 2017.

Bezuidenhout, R. M., C. Davis, and F. du Plooy-Cilliers. 2021. Research Matters. Claremont: Juta and Company.

Coker, H. 2020. “Why Does Digital Learning Matter? Digital Competencies, Social Justice, and Critical Pedagogy in Initial Teacher Education.” Journal of Teaching and Learning 14 (1): 133–141. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v14i1.6259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v14i1.6259

Dillon, J. D. 2019. “The Science behind Microlearning Effectiveness.” Training and Development (1839–8561) 46 (4): 14–16.

Fourie, I., and J. Julien. 2014. “Ending the Dance: A Research Agenda for Affect and Emotion in Studies of Information Behaviour IR Information Research.” Proceedings of ISIC Leeds The Information Behaviour Conference 2–5 September.

Fulkerson, D. M., S. A. Ariew, and T. E. Jacobson. 2017. “Revisiting Metacognition and Metaliteracy in the ACRL Framework.” Communications in Information Literacy 11 (1): 21–41. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.45

Gandotra, N. 2019. “Mobile Based Library Services.” International Journal of Applied Marketing and Management 4 (2): 18–21.

GMSA Mobile Connectivity Index. 2020.

Ikoja-Odongo, R., and J. B. Mostert. 2006. “Information Seeking Behaviour: A Conceptual Framework.” South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science 72 (3): 145–158. https://doi.org/10.7553/72-3-1112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7553/72-3-1112

Jacobson, T. E., and P. K. Mackey. 2016. Metaliteracy in Practice. Chicago: ALA Neal-Schuman.

Jandrić, P. 2020. “The Post-digital Challenge of Pandemic Education.” Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies 71 (137).

King, R. 2011. “Metacognition: Information Literacy and Web 2.0 as an Instructional Tool.” Currents in Teaching and Learning 3 (2): 22–32.

Knox, J. 2019. “What Does the ‘Post-digital’ Mean for Education? Three Critical Perspectives on the Digital, with Implications for Educational Research and Practice.” Postdigit Sci Educ 1: 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00045-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00045-y

Lui, Yan Quan, and S. Briggs. 2015. “A Library in the Palm of Your Hand: Mobile Services in Top 100 University Libraries.” Information Technology and Libraries 34 (2): 133–148. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v34i2.5650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v34i2.5650

Mack, L. 2010. “The Philosophical Underpinnings of Educational Research.” Poliglossia, vol. 19, October 2010.

Martin, A., and E. Felix. 2020. How Covid-19 is Creating Phygital Experiences with Technology as the Interface Between People and Space? https://www.lumsa.it/sites/default/files/link/Phygital-Transformation-LUMSA-2022-Call-for-Papers.pdf.

Mele, C., T. Russo-Spena, M. Tregua, and C. C. Amitrano. 2021 “The Millennial Customer Journey: A Phygital Mapping of Emotional, Behavioural, and Social Experiences.” Journal of Consumer Marketing 38 (4): 420–433. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-03-2020-3701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-03-2020-3701

Mikheev, A. A., A. Krasnov, A. Griffith, and M. Draganov. 2021. “The Interaction Model within Phygital Environment as an Implementation of the Open Innovation Concept.” Journal of Open Innovation 7 (2): 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020114

Morris, S. M., and J. Stommel. 2017. “Open Education as Resistance: MOOCs and Critical Digital Pedagogy.” MOOCs and their Afterlives: Experiments in Scale and Access in Higher Education, 177. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226469591.003.0012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226469591.003.0012

Noon, E. J. 2018. “Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis: An Appropriate Methodology for Educational Research?” Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice 6 (1): 75–83. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i1.304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i1.304

Ocholla, D., and L. Ocholla. 2020. “Readiness of Academic Libraries in South Africa to Research, Teaching and Learning Support in the Fourth Industrial Revolution.” Library Management 41 (6/7): 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-04-2020-0067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-04-2020-0067

Rapchak, M. 2021. “Introducing Critical Librarianship to Information Professionals: Using Critical Pedagogy and Critical Information Literacy in a LIS Graduate Course.” Communications in Information Literacy 15 (1): 140–157. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2021.15.1.8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2021.15.1.8

Vaismoradi, M., J. Jones, H. Turunen, and S. Snelgrove. 2016. “Theme Development in Qualitative Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis. Journal of Nursing Education and Training 6 (5): 100–110. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100

Waddell, M., and E. Clariza. 2018. “Critical Digital Pedagogy and Cultural Sensitivity in the Library Classroom: Infographics and Digital Storytelling.” College and Research Libraries News 79 (5): 228–232. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.79.5.228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.79.5.228

World Economic Forum (WEF). 2015. “What will Africa’s Future Libraries Look like?”

Published

2022-09-06

How to Cite

Van Wyk, Brenda. 2022. “Preparing for the New Phygital Generation As Potential Academic Library Users in South African Higher Education”. Mousaion: South African Journal of Information Studies 40 (2):14 pages. https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-659X/10130.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2021-09-27
Accepted 2022-03-24
Published 2022-09-06