Distance Education Research in South Africa: A Longitudinal Study into the Research Levels of ODL Journal Articles

Jennifer  Roberts; Hugo Denton van der Walt

doi:10.25159/2663-659X/10198

Authors

Jennifer Roberts University of South Africa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7084-4036
Hugo Denton van der Walt University of South Africa https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8285-8876

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-659X/10198

Keywords:

Distance education, ODL, online learning, research trends, South Africa

Abstract

The measure of an academic field lies in the richness and depth of its published research, especially within the ever-developing field of distance education, which is relatively new. The University of South Africa is one of the oldest open distance learning (ODL) higher education institutes globally, which has given rise to its status internationally as a leader of distance education. It is prudent to analyse and reflect on the research outputs published by South African academics, particularly regarding the levels of research that are conducted. This article follows the research published by Roberts, which analysed South African distance learning research levels and sublevels from articles published between 2011 and 2015. This longitudinal study applied a thematic content analysis of the titles and abstracts of all ODL-related papers published by South African authors. The findings compare ODL trends for the five-year periods from 2010 to 2014 and 2015 to 2019. The data were obtained from the Scopus and SABINET databases, using the same search criteria employed by Roberts. The levels of research publications were analysed according to the open distance learning research framework of Zawacki-Richter presented through descriptive statistics. The results indicate that although the number of published open distance learning research articles has more than doubled, the research levels have not shown any significant change from the previous five years. The South African ODL publications should give attention to meso- and macro-level research to enhance the ODL development within Southern Africa and create local trends fit for purpose.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Jennifer Roberts, University of South Africa

Professor

College of Education

Institute for Open and Distance Learning

References

Altman, D.G. 1991. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman and Hall. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429258589

Bernard, R. M., P. C. Abrami, Y. Lou, E. Borokhovski, A. Wade, L. Wozney, P. A. Wallet, M. Fiset, and B. Huang. 2004. “How Does Distance Education Compare with Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature.” Review of Educational Research 74 (3): 379–439. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003379

Cohen, J. 1960. “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 (1): 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104

DHET (Department of Higher Education and Training). 2017. Report on the Evaluation of the 2015 Universities’ Research Output. Pretoria: DHET. Accessed June 23, 2022. http://www.dhet.gov.za/Policy%20and%20Development%20Support/Report-2015-Research-Outputs-final-version.pdf.

Elo, S., M. Kääriäinen, O. Kanste, T. Pölkki, K. Utriainen, and H. Kyngäs. 2014. “Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness.” SAGE Open 4: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633

Gauthier, R. F. 2018. World Development Report 2018: Learning to Realize Education’s Promise. Washington, DC: The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.4000/ries.6107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ries.6107

Krippendorff, K. 2013. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Lee, Y., M. P. Driscoll, and D. W. Nelson. 2006. “The Past, Present, and Future of Research in Distance Education: Results of a Content Analysis.” Journal of Library and Information Services in Distance Learning 2 (3): 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1300/J192v02n03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J192v02n03_05

Perraton, H. 2000. “Rethinking the Research Agenda.” International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 1 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v1i1.5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v1i1.5

Roberts, J. 2016. “The State of Distance Education in South Africa: An Analysis of Trends, Research Areas and Publication Vehicles.” In Forging New Pathways of Research and Innovation in Open and Distance Learning: Reaching from the Roots—9th EDEN Research Workshop Proceedings, edited by A. Volungeviciene, A. Szűcs, and I. Mázár, 245–63. Budapest: European Distance and E-Learning Network.

Sultana, M. A. 2019. “A Study of the Importance of Academic Research in Social Sciences and the Role of University Libraries in A. P.” Library Philosophy and Practice 2620. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2620.

Zawacki-Richter, O. 2009. “Research Areas in Distance Education—A Delphi Study.” International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 10 (3): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.674

Zawacki-Richter, O., E. M. Bäcker, and S. Vogt. 2009. “Review of Distance Education Research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of Research Areas, Methods, and Authorship Patterns.” International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 10 (6): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i6.741

Zawacki-Richter, O., and S. Naidu. 2016. “Mapping Research Trends from 35 Years of Publications in Distance Education.” Distance Education 37 (3): 245–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1185079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1185079