THE EFFECTS OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES ON INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES IN SOUTH AFRICA: A LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE PERSPECTIVE

Authors

  • Ken Chisa University of KwaZulu-Natal
  • Ruth Hoskins University of KwaZulu-Natal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/0027-2639/1676

Keywords:

indigenous communities, indigenous knowledge, information and communication technologies, digital divide, social empowerment

Abstract

When information and communication technologies (ICTs) are introduced in an indigenous environment, they bring along with them mass media, popular culture and global languages such as English. This may cause conflict with existing local traditions and may sometimes erode cultural stability. Paradoxically, these technologies can also empower the same community with new tools to create new economic, social and political opportunities besides preserving, promoting, and even safeguarding its indigenous cultural identity. This dichotomy begs the question: under which conditions can ICTs empower indigenous communities? This article investigates this question, focusing on the role of ICTs in promoting indigenous peoples’ livelihoods in South Africa. It analyses key factors under which information and knowledge can be instrumental for the empowerment of marginalised groups. The article argues that improved access to information coupled with ICT skills can enhance indigenous peoples’ capabilities to make strategic life choices and uplift their own livelihoods. Furthermore, the article develops an alternative evaluation framework for ICT interventions in indigenous communities based on Sen’s (1999) capability approach. In contrast to the dominant narrative around the ‘digital divide’, this framework places the human development of indigenous communities other than ICTs at the centre of the analysis. With examples and experiences from two case studiesfrom South Africa and Uganda, the article concludes that there is no direct causal link between ICTs and the social development of indigenous communities, but that in fact this relationship is shaped by a dynamic, multi-dimensional interrelationship between technology and the social context.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Africa Media Online. 2011. Digital heritage body of knowledge: creating and managing digital resources in South Africa’s heritage sector. Unpublished document.

Alkire, S. 2002. Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199245797.001.0001

Avgerou, C & Walsham, G. 2001. Introduction: IT in developing countries, in Information technology in context: studies from the perspective of developing countries, ed. C Avgerou & G Walsham. London: Ashgate.

Bebbington, A. 1999. Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analysing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty in the Andes. World Development 27(12):2021–2044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00104-7

Ballantyne, P. 2002. Collecting and propagating local development content. INASP Newsletter 20(2–3).

Benjamin, P & Dahms, M. 1999. For educated people only: reflection on a visit to two multi-purpose telecentres in Uganda. http://www.idrc.ca/pan/telecentres.html (Accessed 22 May 2013).

Benjamin, P, Stavrou, A, Burton, P & McCarthy, C. 2000. Telecentre 2000: synthesis report. Johannesburg: DRA-Development and LINK Centre. http://www.idrc.ca/pan/telecentres. html (Accessed 22 May 2013).

Bertot, J, McClure, C, Thomas, S & Jaeger, T. 2008. The impacts of free public Internet access on public library patrons and communities. Library Quarterly 78(3):285–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/588445

Black, J. 1999. Information rich, information poor: bridging the digital divide. International Institute for Communication and Development. http://www.iicd.org (Accessed 20 November 2013).

Braga, C. 1998. Inclusion or exclusion: information for development. http://www.unesco.org/ courier/1998_12/uk/dossier/txt21.htm (Accessed 8 September 2013).

Burton, S. 2002. Development at any cost: ICTs and people’s participation in South Africa. Communication 28(2):45–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02500160208537941

Castells, M. 1997. The information age: economy, society and culture: the power of identity. Oxford: Blackwell.

Chisa, K. 2006. A comparative study of the role of donors in three telecentre projects in Africa. MIS thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg.

Cilliberti, P. 2004. Research methods. http://www.pcillibertLcom/methods htm (Accessed 25 April 2014).

Comim, F. 2001. Operationalizing Sen’s capabilities approach. Paper prepared for the Conference on Justice and Poverty: Examining Sen’s Capability Approach, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom, 5–7 June. http://www.uiamx/humanismocristiano/seminario_capability/pdf/7.pdf (Accessed 25 April 2014).

Dagron, A. 2001. Telecentres as the promised flame of knowledge. Journal of Development Communication 12(2):71–75.

Delgadillo, K, Gomez, R & Stoll, K. 2002. Community telecentres for development: lessons from community telecentres in Latin America and the Caribbean. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.

Deloitte & GSMA. 2012. Sub-Saharan Africa mobile observatory 2012. http://www.gsma.com/publicpolicy/wp.../SSA_FullReport_v6.1_clean.pdf (Accessed 9 May 2013).

Etta, F & Parvyn-Wamahiu, S (eds). 2003. Information and communication technologies for development in Africa: the experience with community telecentres. Vol. 2. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre and the Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa.

Gasper, D. 2000. Development as freedom: taking economics beyond commodities: the cautious boldness of Amartya Sen. Journal of International Development 12(7):989–1001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1328(200010)12:7<989::AID-JID724>3.0.CO;2-Q

Gumucio, D. 2001. Making waves: stories of participatory communication for social change. New York: Rockefeller Foundation. Unpublished document.

Heeks, R.1999. Information and communication technologies, poverty and development. Development Informatics working paper series no. 5. IDPM, University of Manchester. Unpublished document. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3477770

Heuertz, L, Gordon, A, Gordon, M & Moore, E. 2003. The impact of public access computing on rural and small town libraries. Rural Libraries 23(1):51–79.

Hewitt de Alcántara, C. 2001. The development divide in a digital age: technology, business and society programmes. Issue paper, no. 4. UNRISD, Geneva. Unpublished document.

Institute of African Development. 2012. South Africa – profile. http://www.inadev.org/profile_-_south_africa.htm (Accessed 3 May 2013).

Intermediate Technology Development Group. 2001. Enable people to make technologies work for them: ITDG’s response to the Human Development Report. http://www.org/html/advocacy/itdg_response_to_hdr_june2.pdf (Accessed 3 May 2013).

Internet World Stats. 2013. Internet usage statistics for Africa. http://www.Internetworldstats.com/stats1htm (Accessed 2 May 2013).

ITDG see Intermediate Technology Development Group.

Kabeer, N. 1999. Resources, agency, achievement: reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change 30(3):261–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125

Kamssu, J, Siekpe, S & Ellzy, A. 2004. Shortcomings to globalisation: using Internet technology and electronic commerce in developing countries. Journal of Developing Areas 38(1):151–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2005.0010

Kenny, C. 2003. Development’s false divide: giving Internet access to the world’s poorest will cost a lot and accomplish little. Foreign Policy (Jan–Feb):76–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3183524

Kuriyan, R & Toyama, K. 2007. Review of research on rural PC kiosks. http://research.microsoft. com/research/tem/kiosks/ (Accessed 2 February 2012).

Mansell, R. 1999. Information and communication technologies for development: assessing the potential and the risks. Telecommunications Policy 23:35–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961(98)00074-3

Mayanja, M. 1999. The Nakaseke multipurpose community telecentre in Uganda. http://www. col.org/telecentres/chapter%2010.pdf (Accessed 6 January 2013).

Nakata, M. 2002. Indigenous knowledge and the cultural interface: underlying issues at the intersection of knowledge and information systems. IFLA Journal 28(5/6):281–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/034003520202800513

Ngulube, P. 2002. Research procedures used by Master of Information Studies students at the University of Natal in the period 1982 to 2002 with special reference to their sampling techniques and survey response ratio: a methodological discourse. International Information and Library Review 37(2):127–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2005.10762673

Norris, P. 2001. Digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty and the Internet worldwide. http://www.col.org/telecentres/chapter%2010.pdf (Accessed 6 January 2013). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164887

Nussbaum, M. 2000. Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841286

Orlikowski, W. 2000. Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organizational Science 11(4):404–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600

Panos Institute. 1998. The Internet and poverty: Panos media briefing no. 28. Panos Institute, London. Unpublished document.

Pohjola, M. 2002. The new economy: facts, impacts and policies in information economics and policy. Unpublished document. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6245(01)00063-4

Robinson, S. 1998. Telecenters in Mexico: learning the hard way. Paper presented at the Partnerships and Participation in Telecommunications for Rural Development: Exploring what Works and Why Conference at the University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 26–27 October.

Schreiner, H. 1998. Rural women, development and telecommunications: a pilot programme in South Africa, in Gender and technology, ed. C Sweetman. Oxfordshire: Carfax: 64–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/741923125

Selwyn, N. 2003. ICT for all? Access and use of public ICT sites in the UK. Information, Communication & Society 6(3):350–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118032000155285

Sen, A. 1999. Development as freedom. New York: Knopf Press.

UNDP see United Nations Development Program.

United Nations Development Program. 2001. Human development report 2001: making new technologies work for human development. Oxford: UNDP.

Van Dijk, A. 2005. The deepening divide: inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229812

Wade, R. 2002. Bridging the digital divide: new route to development or new form of dependency? Global Governance 8(4):376–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-00804005

Walsham, G. 1998. Interpretative case studies in information systems research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems 4:74–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.1995.9

Wilson, E. 2004. The information revolution and developing countries. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

Women of Uganda Network. 2002. A CD-ROM for rural women in Africa: development of a new information tool. http://www.wougnet.org/News/cdupdate.html (Accessed 7 January 2013).

World Bank. 2001. Knowledge for development: world development report. New York: Oxford University Press.

World Bank. 2002. The networking revolution: opportunities and challenges for developing countries. New York: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-30

How to Cite

Chisa, Ken, and Ruth Hoskins. 2014. “THE EFFECTS OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES ON INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES IN SOUTH AFRICA: A LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE PERSPECTIVE”. Mousaion: South African Journal of Information Studies 32 (3):49-68. https://doi.org/10.25159/0027-2639/1676.

Issue

Section

Articles