NEXT-GENERATION CATALOGUES: HOW ARE THE ACADEMIC LIBRARIES IN KENYA FARING?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/0027-2639/1679Keywords:
Online Public Access Catalogue, next-generation library catalogue, discovery tools, academic libraries, Kenya, library management systems, features of library catalogueAbstract
The library catalogue has changed over the years from a card catalogue to its electronic successor, the Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC), to what is called the next-generation library catalogue, sometimes referred to as the library 2.0 catalogue or ‘the third-generation catalogue’. The purpose of this study was to investigate the current state of catalogues in academic libraries in Kenya and to evaluate whether these libraries have incorporated features of the next-generation catalogues in their OPACs. The study applied a checklist of features commonly identified as characteristics of the next-generation catalogue to examine whether the OPACs of university libraries in Kenya are comparable to the next-generation library catalogue. The findings of the study showed that libraries in Kenya have made some progress towards transforming their OPACs to the next-generation catalogue but have not reached the ideal. None of the OPACs has all the features evaluated. Progress has been made with features, such as enhanced content, simple keyword search and faceted navigation. However, none of the catalogues has federated searching capabilities. The study also found out that close to half of the libraries which have their OPACs available online are using Koha as their Library Management System (LMS). This article provides valuable information for library policy makers interested in modernising their catalogues or acquiring discovery tools for their institution. The article may also be a useful tool for evaluating OPACs modules of the integrated LMS, especially for libraries that are in the process of selecting a suitable LMS.
Metrics
References
Allison, DA. 2012. Discovery tools? You can compete with Google. http://www.slideshare net/ nebraskaccess/discovery-tools-you-can-compete-with-google (Accessed 13 May 2009).
Breeding, M. 2007. Next-generation library catalogues. Library Technology Reports 43(4):5–14.
Breeding, M. 2008. Making a business case for open source ILS. Computers in Libraries 28(3):36–39.
Breeding, M. 2010. State of the art in library discovery. Computers in Libraries 30(1):31–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0307472200016370
CCK see Communications Commission of Kenya.
Communications Commission of Kenya. 2013. ICT Sector quarterly statistical report. http:// www.cck.go.ke/resc/downloads/Q4_201213_STATISTICS_final_25th_oct_2013.pdf (Accessed 14 March 2014).
Center for History New Media. 2014. Zotero: the next-generation research tool. http://www. zotero.org/ (Accessed 13 May 2014).
Commission for University Education. 2014a. Introduction to accreditation. http://www.cue. or ke/services/accreditation/introduction-to-accreditation (Accessed 28 January 2014).
Commission for University Education. 2014b. Status of universities in Kenya. http://www.cue. or ke/services/accreditation/status-of-universities (Accessed 28 January 2014).
CUE see Commission for University Education.
De Jager, K. 2007. Opening the library catalogue up to the web: a view from South Africa. Information Development 23(1):48–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666907075634
Dorman, D. 2008. The potential of metasearching as an ‘open’ service. Library Hi Tech 26(1):58–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830810857807
EIFL. 2009. Faceted search. http://www.eifl.net/faceted-search (Accessed 28 January 2014).
Fagan, JC. 2010. Usability studies of faceted browsing: a literature review. Information Technology and Libraries 29(2):58–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v29i2.3144
Faiks, A, Radermacher, A & Sheehan, A. 2007. What about the book? Google-izing the catalogue with tables of contents. Library Philosophy and Practice. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/125 (Accessed 12 August 2012).
Hofmann, MA & Yang, SQ. 2012 Discovering what’s changed: a revisit of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries. Library Hi Tech 30(2):253–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831211239942
Houghton, V & Hu, X. 2010. Social cataloging: a golden opportunity for libraries to engage users. http://www.viviennehoughton.com/uploads/5/2/5/6/5256567/folksomy_socialcataloging_librarything.pdf (Accessed 15 August 2012).
iAGRI see Innovative Agricultural Research Initiative.
Innovative Agricultural Research Initiative. 2014. LibHub promotion and training. http://stories.iagri.org/blog/2014/4/libhub-promotion (Accessed 15 April 2013).
Jetty, S, Anbu, K, Paul, J, Jain, PK & Hopkinson, A. 2011. OPAC 2.0: towards the next generation of online library catalogues. http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/7964/1/OPAC_2.pdf (Accessed 15 August 2012).
Joint, N. 2009. Managing the implementation of a federated search tool in an academic library. Library Review 58(1):11–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00242530910928898
Keast, D. 2011. A survey of Koha in Australian special libraries: open source brings new opportunities to the outback. OCLC Systems & Services 27(1):23–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10650751111106537
Keene, C. 2011. Discovery services: next-generation of searching scholarly information. Serials Review 24(2):193–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/24193
Koha. 2014. Official website of Koha Library Software. http://koha-community.org/ (Accessed 15 August 2012).
Koha Kenya Community. 2014. http://kohakenya.wordpress.com/ (Accessed 28 January 2014).
La Barre, K. 2006. The use of faceted analytico-synthetic theory as revealed in the practice of website construction and design. PhD thesis, Indiana University, Indiana. http://leep.lis.uiuc.edu/publish/klabarre/dissBYsectionhtml (Accessed 30 August 2012).
Leah, P & Erway, R. 2011. Single search: the quest for the Holy Grail. http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2011/2011-17.pdf (Accessed 30 August 2012).
Lee, Y & Yang, S. 2012. Folksomies as subject access: a survey of tagging in library online catalogues and discovery layers. IFLA Satellite Post-Conference. Beyond Libraries: Subject Metadata in the Digital Environment and Semantic Web, 17–18 August, Tallinn, Estonia. http://www.slideshare.net/yanyilee/presentation-lee-8182012 (Accessed 30 August 2012).
Lindoström, H & Malmsten, M. 2008. User-centered design and the next-generation OPAC– a perfect match. http://library.wurnl/elag2008/presentations/Lindstrom_Malmsten.pdf (Accessed 2 August 2012).
Little, G. 2012. Managing technology: thinking about discovery layers. Journal of Academic Librarianship 38(6):346–347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.09.019
Macan, B, Fernandez, JV & Stojanovski, J. 2012. Open source solutions for libraries: ABCD vs Koha. Electronic Library and Information Systems 47(2):136–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00330331311313726
Marcin, S & Morris, P. 2008. OPAC: the next-generation placing an encore front end onto a SirsiDynix ILS. Computers in Libraries 28(5):6–9.
Marcum, DB. 2008. Response to the record: report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the future of bibliographic control. www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/news/ LCWGResponse-Marcum-Final-061008.pdf (Accessed 12 August 2012).
Moore, KB & Greene, C. 2012. The search for a new OPAC: selecting an open source discovery layer. Serials Review 38(1):24–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2012.10765415
Nyaigotti-Chacha, C. 2004. Reforming higher education in Kenya: challenges, lessons and opportunities. http://www.international.ac.uk/resources/Reforming_HE.pdf (Accessed 15 August 2012).
Rolla, PJ. 2009. User tags versus subject headings. Library Resources and Technical Services 53(3):174–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.53n3.174
Sempertool. 2014. LibHub. http://www.sempertool.dk/?func=loadTemplateHYPERLINK "http://www.sempertool.dk/?func=loadTemplate&template=libhub"&HYPERLINK "http:// www.sempertool.dk/?func=loadTemplate&template=libhub"template=libhub (Accessed 15 March 2014).
Shiundu, B. 2012. Open source library management systems. http://aitec.usp.net/AITEC%20 East%20Africa%20ICT%20Summit,%20Nariobi,%2024-25%20October%202012/ Bernard%20Shiundu%20Strathmore%20%20Open%20Source%20Library%20 Management%20Systems.pdf (Accessed 15 May 2014).
Singh, M & Sanaman, G. 2012. Open source integrated library management systems: comparative analysis of Koha and NewGenLib. Electronic Library 30(6):809–832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471211282127
Spiteri, L, Tarulli, L & Graybeal, A. 2010. The public library catalogue as a social space: transaction log analysis of user interaction with social discovery systems. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 47(1):1–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504701307
Tarulli, L. 2012. The library catalogue as social space: promoting patron driven collections, online communities, and enhanced reference and readers’ services. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
Trinoskey, J, Brahmi, FA & Gall, C. 2009. Zotero: a product review. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries 6(3):224–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15424060903167229
UbuntuNet Alliance. 2013. LibHub: a library search and discovery tool launched in Uganda. Newsletter for UbuntuNet Alliance 6(4). http://www.ubuntunet.net/august2013#libhub (Accessed 15 August 2012).
UoN see University of Nairobi.
University of Nairobi. 2014. Discovery interface for electronic resources. http://uonlibrary. uonbi.ac ke/node/916 (Accessed 15 August 2012).
Vander Wal, T. 2005. Folksonomy definition and Wikipedia. http://www.vanderwal.net/random/ entrysel.php?blog=1750 (Accessed 15 May 2014).
Westcott, J, Chappell, A & Lebel, C. 2009. Library thing for libraries at Claremont. Library Hi Tech 27(1):78–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830910942937
White, RW & Roth, RA. 2009. Exploratory search: beyond the query-response paradigm. San Rafael, CA: Morgan and Claypool. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02260-9
Williams, M. 2008. New Jack Librarian. www.newjackalmanac.ca/2008/03/ontarioscholars-portal-yours-tohtml (Accessed 7 April 2010).
Wilson, K. 2007. OPAC 2.0: next-generation online library catalogues ride the Web 2.0 wave! Online Currents 21(10):406.
Yang, SQ & Hofmann, MA. 2010. The next-generation library catalogue: a comparative study of OPACs of Koha, Evergreen, and Voyager. Information Technology & Libraries 29(3):141–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v29i3.3139
Yang, SQ & Hofmann, MA. 2011. Next-generation or current generation? A study of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries in the USA and Canada. Library Hi Tech 29(2):266–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831111138170
Yang, SQ & Wagner, K. 2010. Evaluating and comparing discovery tools: how close are we towards next-generation catalogue? Library Hi Tech 28(4):690–709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011096312
Zumer, M. 2007. Amazon: competition or complement to OPACs. http://www.che.or.ke/status.html (Accessed 30 September 2012).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
