DECOLONISING INDIGENOUS INTELLECTUAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS IN HERITAGE INSTITUTIONS: A SURVEY OF POLICY AND PROTOCOL IN SOUTH AFRICA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/0027-2639/220Keywords:
culture, decolonising methodology, Delphi method, Digital Innovation South Africa, digitisation, indigenous knowledge, intellectual property rights, policyAbstract
This article analyses the protection of indigenous knowledge (IK) in South Africa, exploring if and how the rights of indigenous peoples are insulated from pillage by existing policy and protocol frameworks in cultural heritage institutions. The article examines how policy and protocol in these institutions, the socio-economic realities within indigenous communities and legislative bottlenecks bear on the digitisation enterprise in the country. The study used the Delphi method to collect and analyse data. The major finding of the study was that, in an attempt to safeguard indigenous intellectual and cultural rights, some cultural heritage institutions are seeking to bridge the gap between Western legal requirements and indigenous intellectual rights by the inclusion of specific policy measures which take on board indigenous interests and concerns. The major themes that emerged from the study have cultural, legislative and structural underpinnings. These themes outline the fundamental characteristics of the policies and protocols of digitisation initiatives in the country. The study recommends that heritage institutions in South Africa should recognise their influence as socio cultural agents and actively submit ‘decolonising’ recommendations for statutory development. It also urges these institutions to continue building consultation networks with various indigenous stakeholders in order to improve best practice.
Metrics
References
Adams, S. 2001. Projecting the next decade in safety management: a Delphi technique study. Professional safety 46(10): 26-29.
Agrawal, A. 1995. Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and change 26(3): 413-439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1995.tb00560.x
Anderson, J. 2005. Indigenous knowledge, intellectual property, libraries and archives: crises of access, control and future utility. In: Nakata, M. & Langton, M. (eds). Australian indigenous knowledge and libraries. Sydney: University of Technology Press, pp. 55-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2005.10721250
Andrzejewski, A. 2010. Traditional knowledge and patent protection: conflicting views on international patent standards. PER/PELJ 13(4): 94-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v13i4.65045
Brown, D. 2007. Te ahua hiko: digital cultural heritage and indigenous objects, people and environments. In: Cameron, F. & Kenderdine, S. (eds). Theorising digital cultural heritage: a critical discourse. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 77-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262033534.003.0005
Bowles, N. 1999. The Delphi technique. Nursing standard 13(45): 32-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/ns1999.07.13.45.32.c2650
Burrell, T. 1999. Burrell's South African patent and design law. 3rd ed. Durban: Butterworths.
Burtis, A. 2010. Managing indigenous knowledge and traditional cultural expression: is technology the solution? http://www.lib.org/ISc/Isssues/ISC29/articles/3-ManagingIndigenousKnowledge.pdf. Accessed on 19 March 2014.
Castells, M. 2007. Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International journal of communication 1(1): 238 – 266.
Creswell, J. 2003. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dalkey, N. 1969. An experimental study of group opinion. Futures 1(5): 408-426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(69)80025-X
Deloria, V. 1995. Red earth, white lies: native Americans and the myth of scientific fact. New York: Scribner.
Department of Arts Culture, Science and Technology. 2001. Annual general meeting of the International Federation of Reproduction Rights Organisations.
http://www.daxst.go.za/speeches/minister/oct2001/int_fed_rep.htm. Accessed 20 March 2014.
Derlon, B. & Mauze, M. [n.d]. “Sacred†or “sensitive†objects.
http://www.necep.net/papers/OS_Derlon-Mauze.pdf. Accessed 7 September 2014.
Digital Innovation South Africa. 2009. About us.
http://www.disa.ukzn.ac.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=44&Item
id=28. Accessed 6 September 2014.
Faulkner, J. & Lewincamp, B. 2003. A keyhole to the collection: the AIATSIS library digitisation pilot program. Australian library journal 52(3): 239-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2003.10721551
Gordon, T. 1994. The Delphi method. http://www.futurovenezuela.org/_curso/5-delphi.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2014.
Greyling, B. 2007. Preserving indigenous knowledge: a model for community participation in African libraries. Information studies 14(2): 71-84.
Hammersmith, J. 2008. Converging indigenous and western knowledge systems: implications for tertiary education. PhD thesis. University of South Africa. http://et.ac.za/ETD-db/theses/available/etd-09302008-134026/unrestricted/thesis.pdf Accessed 13 July 2014.
Hanafin, S. and Brooks, A. 2005. The Delphi technique: a methodology to support the development of a national set of child well being indicators. Dublin: New Oceans.
Hanlon, D. 1999. The chill of history: the experience, emotion and changing politics of archival research in the Pacific. Archives and manuscripts 27(2): 8-21.
Hasson, F., Keeney, S. & McKenna, H. 2000. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of advanced nursing 32(4): 1008-1015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x
Hoffman, B. 2006. Art and cultural heritage: law, policy, and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hsu, C. and Sandford, B. 2007. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical assessment research and evaluation 12(10): 28-41.
Janke, T. 1997. Issues of indigenous music and copyright. Paper presented at the 5th annual conference of the International Association for the study of Popular Music. Sydney, 21 July.
Janke, T. 2005. Managing indigenous knowledge and indigenous cultural and intellectual property. Australian Academic & research libraries 36(2): 99-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2005.10721251
Joyce, P. 1999. The politics of the liberal archive. History of the human sciences 12(2): 35-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09526959922120234
Kawooya, D. 2006. Copyright, indigenous knowledge and Africa’s university libraries. http://www.ifla.org/Vifla72/index.htm. Accessed 20 March 2007.
Lejano, R. 2006. Frameworks for policy analysis: merging text and context. New York: Routledge.
Lindeman, C. 1981. Priorities within the health care system: a Delphi survey. Kansas City, MO: American Nurses’ Association.
Linstone, H. and Turoff, M. (eds). 1975. The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
Martino, J. 1983. Technological forecasting for decision making. New York: North-Holland.
Nakata, M. 2002. Indigenous knowledge and the cultural interface: underlying issues at the intersection of knowledge and information systems. IFLA journal 28(5/60): 281-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/034003520202800513
Nakata, M., Byrne, A., & Nakata, V. 2005. Libraries, indigenous Australians and developing protocols strategy for the library and information sector. Australian academic and research libraries 36(2): 195-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2005.10721259
Nakata, M., Nakata, V., Gardiner, G., McKeough, J., Byrne, A. & Gibson, J. 2008. Indigenous digital collections: an early look at the organisation and culture interface. Australian academic and research libraries 39(4): 223-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2008.10721360
Nyumba, J. 2006. The role of the library in promoting the application of indigenous knowledge in development projects. Proceedings of the 72nd International Federation of Library Associations Conference, Seoul, 20-24 August 2006.
Reddy, S. 2006. Making heritage legible: who owns traditional medical knowledge? International journal of cultural property 13(2): 161-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739106060115
Russell, L. 2005. Indigenous knowledge and archives: accessing hidden history and understandings. Australian academic & research libraries 36(2): 169-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2005.10721256
Seadle, M. 2002. Whose rules?: intellectual property, culture, and indigenous communities. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march02/seadle/03seadle.html. Accessed on 20 March 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1045/march2002-seadle
Sithole, J. 2006. The challenges faced by African libraries and information centres in documenting and preserving indigenous knowledge. http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla72/index.htm. Accessed on 20 March 2014.
Skrydstrup, M. 2006. Towards intellectual property guidelines and best practices for recording and digitising intangible cultural heritage: a survey of codes, conduct and challenges in North America.
http://www.wipo.int/tk/en/folklore/culturalheritage/casestudies/skrydstrup_acronyms.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2014.
Smith, L. 1999. Decolonising methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. New York, N.Y.: St Martin’s Press.
Strauss, S. & Corbin, R. 1998. Basic qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Sullivan, R. 2002. Indigenous cultural and intellectual property rights: a digital library context. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may02/sullivan/05sullivan.html. Accessed 21 June 2014.
Sullivan, R. 2007. Waka rorohiko. AEN journal 2(1): 5.
Sunder, M. 2006. Toward a cultural analysis of intellectual property. Stanford law review 5(2): 33-41.
Szekely, C. & Weatherall, S. 1997. Maori collections in New Zealand libraries. Asian libraries 6(3/4): 215-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10176749710368398
Talakai, M. 2007. Intellectual property and safeguarding cultural heritage: a survey of practices and protocols in the South Pacific. http://www.wipo.int/tk/en//folklore/culturalheritage/casestudies/talakai_report.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2014.
Wareham, E. 2001. Our own identity, our own taonga, our own self coming back: indigenous voices in New Zealand record-keeping. Archivari, 52(Fall): 26-46.
Wa Thiong’o, N. 1986. Decolonising the mind: the politics of language in African literature. London: J. Currey.
World Bank. 1998. World development report. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO). 1998. Intellectual property reading material. http://www.wipo.int. Accessed 15 April 2014.
Wu, W. 2006. Managing IT outsourcing relationships to enhance outcomes: cases in a cross-cultural context. New South Wales: University of New South Wales.
Young, S. and Jamieson, L. 2001. Delivery methodology of the Delphi: a comparison of two approaches. Journal of park and recreation administration 19(1): 458.
Yunkaparta, T. 2006. Indigenous knowledge systems and community ownership Vs Western monoculturalism and intellectual property rights. http://www.aboriginalrights.suite101.com/article/intellectualproprty. Accessed 20 August 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Accepted 2015-11-19
Published 2016-02-08
