SAFEGUARDING SOUTH AFRICA’S PORTUGUESE COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANISATIONAL RECORDS: THE QUESTION OF CUSTODY

Authors

  • Tony Rodrigues Department of Information Science University of South Africa Pretoria, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25159/0027-2639/223

Keywords:

community archives, community-based organisations, community based records, custody of community records, provenance, records management, South African Portuguese community, under documented communities

Abstract

This research article made an effort to uncover the attitudes of South African Portuguese community-based organisations in Gauteng, South Africa, towards the custody of their potential archival records and where these organisations would prefer to house any archival records they may hold. The literature reviewed revealed that community records often present community organisations that hold these records with a dilemma regarding who might take custody of their potential records if they do decide to participate in an archival collecting effort of their community. The literature also showed that archival custody options come in different forms, ranging from traditional approaches to custody of physical and legal transfer of ownership to a mainstream archive, to alternative methods often referred to as the post-custodial and stewardship approaches. Utilising an interpretive qualitative research design, similarly the empirical findings from the interviews held with the Portuguese organisations in Gauteng also revealed that these organisations’ preferences towards custody were not uniform. The results showed that any proposed archival collecting effort of the Portuguese community will have to take all their divergent views into consideration if an archival collecting strategy that facilitates the contribution of the records from all their organisations is to be achieved. It also became evident that each organisation’s preference towards the custody of their records is often contentious and therefore needs to be respected if these community records are to be preserved in the long term.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

NARS see National Archives and Records Service of South Africa

Bastian, J.A. 2002. Taking custody, giving access: a post-custodial for a new century. Archivaria, 53:76-93.

Bastian, J.A. 2006. Reading colonial records through an archival lens: the provenance of place, space and creation. Archival Science, 6:267-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-006-9019-1

Church, L.T. 2008. Documenting African American community heritage. Unpublished dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.

Cook, T. 2007. Archival principles and cultural diversity. Comma, 3/4:37-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/comma.2007.3-4.4

Cook, T. 2013. Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms. Archival Science, 13(2-3):95-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7

Daniel, D. 2010. Documenting the immigrant and ethnic experience in American archives. The American Archivist, 73(1):84-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.73.1.k2837h27wv1201hv

Eales, K. 1998. Community archives: introduction. SA Archives Journal, 40:11-15.

Fernandez, N.M. & Paschild, C.N. 2013. Beyond a box of documents: the collaborative partnership behind the Oregon Chinese Disinterment Document Collection. Journal of Western Archives, 4(1):1-16.

Ferreira, O.J.O. & Le Roux, S.W. 2009. Sagres & suiderkruis: raakpunte tussen Portugal en Suid-Afrika deur vyf eeue. Jeffreysbaai & Pretoria: Adamastor.

Flinn, A. 2007. Community histories, community archives: some opportunities and challenges. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 28(2):151-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701611936

Flinn, A. 2010. Independent community archives and community generated content: writing, saving and sharing our histories. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 16(1):39-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856509347707

Flinn, A. 2011. Archival activism: independent and community-led archives, radical public history and the heritage professions. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 7(2):1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5070/D472000699

Flinn, A., Stevens, M. & Shepherd, E. 2009. Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and mainstream. Archival Science, 9:71-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9105-2

Glaser, C. 2010. Portuguese immigrant history in twentieth century South Africa: a preliminary overview. African Historical Review, 42(2):61-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17532523.2010.517398

Hamilton, C. 2013. Forged and continually refashioning in the crucible of ongoing social and political life: archives and custodial practices as subjects of enquiry. South African Historical Journal, 65(1):1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02582473.2013.763400

Harris, V. 2005. Archives, politics and justice. In, Proctor, M., Cook, M. & Williams, C. (eds). Political pressure and the archival record. Chicago: Society of American Archivists:173-182.

Harris, V. 2011. Jacques Derrida meets Nelson Mandela: archival ethic at the endgame. Archival Science, 11:113-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-010-9111-4

Hatang, S. 2004. Archives as an instrument of politics: case study: the TRC archive. Presentation: Monash University Workshop, Monash University, Johannesburg, October.

Jimerson, R.C. 2006. Embracing the power of archives. The American Archivist, 69 (Spring/Summer):19-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.69.1.r0p75n2084055418

Josias, A. 2011. Towards an understanding of archives as a feature of collective memory. Archival Science, 11:95-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9136-3

Jura Consultants. 2009. Community archives and the sustainable communities agenda. Museums. Midlothian: MLA-Museums, Libraries and Archives Council.

Karleback, T. 1996. Cultural heritage and the acquisition of private archives. Unpublished thesis, University of British Columbia, Victoria, BC.

Keough, B. 2002. Documenting diversity: developing special collections of underdocumented groups. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 26(3) (Autumn):241-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649055.2002.10765857

Leal, L. 1977. Breve historia dos Portugueses na Africa do Sul. Potchefstroom: Potchefstroomse Universteit vir CHO.

Lu, J.X. 1993. The potential for acquisition of ethnic archives. Unpublished thesis, Vancouver, University of British Columbia. Canada.

Manion, A. & Morgan, R. 2006. The Gay and Lesbian Archives. Empowering Women for Gender Equity, 67(2):29-35.

McDonald, A.S. 2008. Out of the Hollinger Box and into the streets: activists, archives and under-documented populations. Unpublished thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

McDuling, A.J. 1995. Language shift and maintenance in the Portuguese community of Johannesburg. Unpublished dissertation, University of South Africa, Pretoria.

Momryk, M. 2001. National significance: the evolution and development of acquisition strategies in the manuscript division, National Archives of Canada. Archivaria, 52:151-174.

Neal, K.M. 2002. Cultivating diversity: the donor connection. Collection Management, 27(2):33-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J105v27n02_04

Nesmith, T. 2006. The concept of societal provenance and records of the nineteenth-century Aboriginal-European relations in western Canada: implications for archival theory. Archival Science, 6:351-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-007-9043-9

Newman, J. 2011. Sustaining community archives. Comma: International Journal on Archives, 1:89-10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/comma.2011.1.08

Pereira, M.V. 2000. Religion, identity and community: the religious life of Portuguese women in Durban. Unpublished thesis, University of South Africa, Pretoria.

Pearce-Moses, R. 2005. A glossary of archival and records terminology. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.

Rodrigues, A. 2013. An archival collecting framework for the records generated by South Africa’s Portuguese community-based organisations in Gauteng. Unpublished dissertation, University of South Africa, Pretoria.

Rodrigues, A., van der Walt, T. & Ngulube, P. 2014. Towards an archival collecting plan for the records generated by the Portuguese community-based organizations in the Gauteng province of South Africa. Archives and Records, 35(2):93-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2014.938269

Singer, L. 1997. The value of community-based ethnic archives: a resource in development, Unpublished thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Stevens, M., Flinn, A. & Shepherd, E. 2010. New frameworks for community engagement in the archive sector: from handing over to handing on. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(1-2):59-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903441770

Tsuruta, S. 1996. Ethnic archives in Canada: a case study of seven Japanese communities. Unpublished thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.

Van Graan, R. 1988. Dias 88. Lantern: Journal of Knowledge and Culture, 37(1):19-94.

Wurl, J. 2005. Ethnicity as provenance: in search of values and principles for documenting the immigrant experience. Archival Issues, 29(1):65-76.

Downloads

Published

2016-02-08

How to Cite

Rodrigues, Tony. 2015. “SAFEGUARDING SOUTH AFRICA’S PORTUGUESE COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANISATIONAL RECORDS: THE QUESTION OF CUSTODY”. Mousaion: South African Journal of Information Studies 33 (3):73-94. https://doi.org/10.25159/0027-2639/223.

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2015-05-28
Accepted 2015-11-19
Published 2016-02-08