STRATEGIES FOR MANAGING SCHOLARLY CONTENT AT UNIVERSITIES IN KENYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25159/0027-2639/639Keywords:
Scholarly communication, scholarly content management, institutional repositories, universities, research productivity, KenyaAbstract
This study investigated strategies employed by universities in Kenya for managing scholarly content. The study was underpinned by the Conversation Theory and the Knowledge Management Process Model and was based on the post-positivist paradigm. A survey was conducted within a multiple case study design. The population of the study consisted of academic staff, postgraduate students, university librarians and representatives of university research units from six universities in Kenya. Self-administered questionnaires were used to collect data from academic staff and postgraduate students while key informants were interviewed. The results revealed that while the respondents generated theses, journal articles and conference papers, the majority did not participate in knowledge generation in the period from 2010 to 2014. The results further revealed that most respondents documented research procedures, backed up information, and used printouts to preserve scholarly content; however, they hardly used digital archives and university servers. The results suggested heavy reliance on modern technology-enabled communication techniques and face-to-face interactions for communication amongst scholars, whereas institutional repositories (IRs) were hardly used. The results revealed inadequate institutional support for research and scholarly communication including funding, material and physical infrastructure, mentorship, and information and communications technology (ICT) facilities. The study concluded that strategies for managing scholarly content at universities in Kenya are weak, impacting negatively on the quality, quantity and visibility of scholarly content; and that a policy framework encompassing the different facets of managing scholarly content is necessary. The study recommended developing specific strategies and policies to enhance scholarly content management; institutionalising mentorship programmes; increasing funding to strengthen universities’ research capacity; and strengthening research niches.Metrics
References
Association of Research Libraries. 2014. Scholarly communication [Online]. Available: http://www.arl.org/focus-areas/scholarly-communication#.VHOrEPmSwmu (Accessed November 25, 2014).
Bagatin, E. and Gontijo, B. 2011. The expansion of a measure: what is a scientific journal impact factor and how important is it for academic Brazilian dermatologists. International Journal of Dermatology, 50, 1432-1434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2011.05092.x
Ball, R. 2011. The scholarly communication of the future: From book information to problem solving. Publishing Research Quarterly, 27, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-011-9202-y
Bernanke, B. S. 2011. Promoting research and development: The government's role [Online]. Available: http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20110516a.htm#f3 (Accessed November 26, 2014).
Borgman, C. L. 2012. The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 1059-1078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22634
Botha, A., Kourie, D. and Snyman, R. 2008. Coping with continuous change in the business environment: Knowledge management and knowledge management technology, Oxford: Chandos. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1533/9781780632056
Carey, J. 2011. Faculty of 1000 and VIVO: Invisible Colleges and Team Science. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, Spring 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1513
Corrado, E. M. 2005. The importance of open access, open source, and open standards for libraries [Online]. Available: http://www.istl.org/05-spring/article2.html (Accessed February 25, 2013). DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/istl2002
Creswell, J. W. 2003. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, California, Sage Publications.
Crow, R. 2002. The case for institutional repositories: A SPARC position paper [Online]. Available: http://works.bepress.com/ir_research/7 (Accessed February 24, 2013).
Cybermetrics Lab. 2013. Ranking web of universities [Online]. Available: http://www.webometrics.info/en/Africa/Kenya%20 (Accessed March 12, 2013).
Davis, P. M. and Connolly, M. J. L. 2007. Institutional Repositories: Evaluating the reasons for non-use of Cornell University's installation of DSpace. D-Lib Magazine, 13.
Deitering, A. M. 2011. Doing Research: Joining the scholarly conversation [Online]. Available: http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1957/20186/DeiteringEde_TAW_Ch06.pdf?sequence=1 (Accessed March 1, 2013).
Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Fuller, M. A. and Schneider, C. 2006. Research standards for promotion and tenure in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 30, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25148714
Edmonds, W. A. and Kennedy, T. D. 2013. An applied reference guide to research designs: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods, Los Angeles: Sage.
Europa.EU. n.d. Europe 2020 targets: Research and Development [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/themes/15_research__development.pdf (Accessed November 26, 2014).
Gabbidon, S. L., Higgins, G. E. and Martin, F. 2011. Moving through the faculty ranks: An exploratory study on the perceived importance of book publishing and publishing in peer-reviewed journals in criminology/criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22, 165-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2010.517767
Groenewald, R. and Breytenbach, A. 2011. The use of metadata and preservation methods for continuous access to digital data. Electronic Library, The, 29, 236-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471111125195
Hall, B. H., Mairesse, J. and Mohnen, P. 2009. Measuring the returns to RandD [Online]. Available: http://www.nber.org/papers/w15622.pdf (Accessed November 26, 2014). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w15622
Halpenny, D., Burke, J., Mcneill, G., Snow, A. and Torreggiani, W. C. 2010. Geographic origin of publications in radiological journals as a function of GDP and percentage of GDP spent on research. Acad Radiol, 17, 768-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2010.01.020
Harley, D., Acord, S. K., Earl-Novell, S., Lawrence, S. and King, C. J. 2010. Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines [Online]. Available: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/15x7385g (Accessed February 17, 2013).
Harvey, L. 2012-14. Social research glossary [Online]. Available: http://www.qualityresearchinternational.com/socialresearch/invisiblecollege.htm (Accessed November 28, 2014).
Jantz, R. C. and Wilson, M. C. 2008. Institutional repositories: Faculty deposits, marketing, and the reform of scholarly communication. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34, 186-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2008.03.014
Johnson, R. K. 2002. Institutional repositories: Partnering with faculty to enhance scholarly communication [Online]. Available: http://pdf.aminer.org/000/846/689/institutional_repositories_partnering_with_faculty_to_enhance_scholarly_communication.pdf (Accessed February 19, 2013).
Johnstone, M. J. 2007. Journal impact factors: implications for the nursing profession. International Nursing Review, 54, 35-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-7657.2007.00527.x
Kanyengo, C. W. 2009. Managing digital information resources in Africa: Preserving the integrity of scholarship. The International Information and Library Review, 41, 34-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2009.10762795
Klemm, W. R. 2002. Software issues for applying conversation theory for effective collaboration via the internet [Online]. Available: http://www.cvm.tamu.edu/wklemm/files/conversationtheory.pdf (Accessed February 28, 2013).
Krevit, L. and Crays, L. 2007. Herding cats: Designing DigitalCommons @ The Texas Medical Center, a multi-institutional repository. OCLC Systems and Services: International digital library perspectives, 23, 116-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/1065075071074844
Lankes, R. D., Silverstein, J. and Nicholson, S. 2007. Participatory networks: the library as conversation. Information Technology and Libraries 26, 17-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v26i4.3267
Library Of Congress. 2013. Perspectives on personal digital archiving [Online]. Available: http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/documents/ebookpdf_march18.pdf (Accessed December 1, 2014).
Lord, P., Macdonald, A., Lyon, L. and Giaretta, D. 2004. From data deluge to data curation [Online]. Available: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/e.j.lyon/150.pdf (Accessed March 1, 2013).
Manghi, P., Bolikowski, L., Manola, N., Schirrwagen, J. and Smith, T. 2012. OpenAIREplus: the European Scholarly Communication Data Infrastructure. D-Lib Magazine, 18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1045/september2012-manghi
Marshall, C. C., Bly, S. and Brun-Cottan, F. 2006. The long term fate of our digital belongings: Toward a service model for personal archives [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0704/0704.3653.pdf (Accessed April 23, 2013).
Mcgill, M. M. and Settle, A. 2012. Identifying effects of institutional resources and support on computing faculty research productivity, tenure, and promotion International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 167-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/1581
Meo, S., Al Masri, A., Usmani, A. and Halepoto, D. 2013. Impact of GDP, spending on RandD, the number of universities and scientific journals on research publications in environmental sciences in the Middle East. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 26, 702-709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13382-013-0147-6
Miller, A. N., Taylor, S. G. and Bedeian, A. G. 2011. Publish or perish: academic life as management faculty live it. Career Development International, 16, 422-445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431111167751
Mullan, F., Frehywot, S., Omaswa, F., Buch, E., Chen, C., Greysen, S. R., Wassermann, T., Abubakr, D. E. E., Awases, M., Boelen, C., Diomande, M. J.-M. I., Dovlo, D., Ferro, J., Haileamlak, A., Iputo, J., Jacobs, M., Koumaré, A. K., Mipando, M., Monekosso, G. L., Olapade-Olaopa, E. O., Rugarabamu, P., Sewankambo, N. K., Ross, H., Ayas, H., Chale, S. B., Cyprien, S., Cohen, J., Haile-Mariam, T., Hamburger, E., Jolley, L., Kolars, J. C., Kombe, G. and Neusy, A.J. 2011. Medical schools in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet, 377, 113-1121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61961-7
National Information Standards Organization (NISO). 2007. A framework of guidance for building good digital collections, Baltimore, Maryland: National Information Standards Organization.
Omekwu, C. 2003. Current issues in accessing documents published in developing countries. Interlending and Document Supply, 21, 130-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02641610310477206
Ondari-Okemwa, E. 2007. Scholarly publishing in sub-Saharan Africa in the twenty-first century: Challenges and opportunities. First Monday, 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v12i10.1966
OPENDOAR. 2014. Search or browse for repositories [Online]. Available: http://www.opendoar.org/find.php (Accessed November 25, 2014).
Pask, G. 1976. Conversation theory: Applications in education and epistemology, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ratanya, F. C. 2010. Electronic theses and dissertations (ETD) as unique open access materials: Case of the Kenya Information Preservation Society (KIPS). Library Hi Tech News, 27, 15-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/07419051011083190
Research Information Network. 2011. Access to scholarly content: Gaps and barriers [Online]. Available: http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/gaps_final_report_low_res.pdf (Accessed February 15, 2013).
Rowlands, I. and Nicholas, D. 2005. New journal publishing models: An international survey of senior researchers [Online]. Available: http://www.homepages.ucl.ac.uk/~uczciro/pa_stm_final_report.pdf (Accessed March 15, 2013).
Royster, P. 2007. Publishing original content in an institutional repository. Serials Review, 34, 27-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2008.10765148
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. 2012. Research methods for business students, England: Pearson Education.
Sawyerr, A. 2004. African universities and the challenge of research capacity development. JHEA/RESA 2, 211–240.
Schmiede, R. 2009. Upgrading academic scholarship: Challenges and chances of the digital age. Library Hi Tech 27, 624-633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830911007727
Schneider, D., Immendor, M. C., Johll, G. M. and Linfield, L. 2009. Scholarship in UW-Extension-Cooperative Extension: The Role of Academic Staff [Online]. Available: http://www.med.wisc.edu/files/smph/docs/education/community_service/scholarship-in-uw-extension-final-ic.pdf (Accessed November 24, 2014).
Scott, B. 2001. Gordon Pask's Conversation Theory: A Domain Independent Constructivist Model of Human Knowing. Foundations of Science, 6, 343-360.
Seipel, M. M. O. 2003. Assessing publication for tenure. Journal of Social Work Education, 39, 79-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2003.10779120
Shamir, L. 2010. The effect of conference proceedings on the scholarly communication in Computer Science and Engineering. Scholarly and Research Communication, 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2010v1n2a25
Shaw, V. N. 2009. Scholarly publishing: Reforms for user friendliness and system efï¬ciency. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 40, 241-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.40.3.241
Stylianou, N. 2012. Standing on the shoulders of giants. The Journal of Global Health [Online]. Available: http://www.ghjournal.org/jgh-online/standing-on-the-shoulders-of-giants/ [Accessed July 19, 2013].
Suber, P. 2003. Removing the barriers to research: An introduction to open access for librarians [Online]. Available: http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/writing/acrl.htm#Footnote_2 (Accessed February 26, 2013). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.64.2.92
Teferra, D. 2004. Striving at the periphery, craving for the centre: The realm of African scholarly communication in the digital age. Journal of Scholarly Publishing 35, 159-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.35.3.159
Tenopir, C., King, D. W., Boyce, P., Grayson, M. and Paulson, K.-L. 2005. Relying on electronic journals: Reading patterns of astronomers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56, 786-802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20167
Thorin, S. E. 2003. Global changes in scholarly communication [Online]. Available: http://surface.syr.edu/sul/17 (Accessed February 19, 2013).
Ubogu, F. N. 2001. Spreading the ETD gospel: A Southern Africa perspective. International Information and Library Review, 33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2001.10762552
Ubogu, F. N. 2009. IR and OA initiatives in Africa. 1st International Conference on African Digital Libraries and Archives. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 1st -3rd July
Warden, R. 2010. The Internet and science communication: blurring the boundaries. Ecancermedicalscience, 4, 1-8.
Western Libraries. 2013. What is scholarly communication? [Online]. Available: http://www.lib.uwo.ca/scholarship/scholarlycommunication.html (Accessed February 18, 2013).
Worldmapper. 2006. Science research [Online]. Available: http://www.worldmapper.org/display.php?selected=205 (Accessed February 19, 2013).
Wu, M. M. 2005. Why Print and Electronic Resources Are Essential to the Academic Law Library. Law Library Journal, 97, 233-256.
Yiotis, K. 2005. The Open Access Initiative: A New Paradigm for Scholarly Communications. Information Technology and Libraries, 24, 157-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v24i4.3378
Zuniga, P. and Wunsch-Vincent, S. 2012. Harnessing the benefits of publicly-funded research [Online]. Available: http://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2012/03/article_0008.html (Accessed November 26, 2014).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Accepted 2016-03-20
Published 2016-07-16
